Contact Lens Adaptation in Neophytes (CLAN)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- The Ohio State University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Has had a completed comprehensive eye exam within the past 6 months
- Able to wear spherical senofilcon A contact lenses
- Able to use Opti-Free PureMoist contact lens solution
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any prior contact lens use
- Topical eye drops within the last two hours of the study visit
- Known systemic health conditions known to alter tear film physiology
- History of severe ocular trauma
- Active ocular infection
- Active ocular inflammation
- Known hypersensitivity to diagnostic eye drops
- Pregnant or breast feeding
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Full-Time Senofilcon A Contact Lens Wear
This group will start wearing contact lenses 8 or more hours per day on the first day of wear
|
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Graduated Senofilcon A Contact Lens Wear
This group will start wearing contact lenses on a graduated schedule (day 1 = 2 hours, day 2 = 4 hours, day 3 = 6 hours, day 4 = 8 hours, day 5 = 8 or more hours).
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Between-Group Difference in Eye Comfort as Measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
This is an eye comfort survey.
The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability.
The index demonstrates sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between normal subjects and patients with dry eye disease.
The OSDI is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring dry eye disease (normal, mild to moderate, and severe) and effect on vision-related function.
|
2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Between-Group Difference in Visual Acuity as Measured With the Bailey-Lovie Chart
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The investigator will measure the subject's visual acuity with a Bailey-Lovie high-contrast paper (logMAR) chart.
logMAR is a method used to observe visual acuity.
Smaller numbers are better scores.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Between-Group Difference in Tear Stability as Measured by Non-Invasive Break Up Time (NIBUT)
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
Non-Invasive Break Up Time (NIBUT) is a measure of tear stability.
The range is 0 to 60 seconds with longer times being better tear stability.
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Between-Group Difference in Tear Volume as Measured by Tear Meniscus Height (TMH)
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
Tear Meniscus Height (TMH) was used at a measure of tear volume.
The range is 0.0 to 2.0 mm with higher values being more tear volume.
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Between-Group Difference in Bulbar Conjunctival Redness as Measured With the Keratograph 5M
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
Eye redness was measured via bulbar conjunctival redness as measured with the Keratograph 5M.
The range is 0 to 4 units with lower numbers being better.
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Between-Group Difference in Upper and Lower Eyelid Blepharitis
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
A slit-lamp biomicroscope was used to document eyelid blepharitis with a 0-3 scale by each eyelid with higher scores being worse blepharitis.
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Between-Group Difference in Corneal Sodium Fluorescein Staining
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
The Brien Holden Vision Institute grading scale was used to evaluate staining by observing the eye after applying sodium fluorescein.
Scores were given for the extent (0-20 units), depth (0-20 units), type (0-20 units) of staining.
Higher scores indicate worse staining.
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Between-Group Difference in Tear Volume as Measured by Schirmer's Test I
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
Tear volume was assessed with Schirmer's Test I test over 5 mins.
This test has a 0-35 mm range with higher values being better tear volume.
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Between-Group Difference in End of Day Contact Lens Comfort as Measured With a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
|
End of day contact lens comfort was measured with a visual analog scale (1-100 scale).
Higher scores indicate better comfort.
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Between-Group Difference in Contact Lens Dry Eye-8 Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Scores
Time Frame: 2-Weeks
|
Contact lens comfort was measured with a scale (1-37 scale).
Lower scores indicate better comfort.
|
2-Weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrew D Pucker, OD, MS, Ohio State University
- Principal Investigator: Jeffrey J Walline, OD, PhD, Ohio State University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sullivan BD, Whitmer D, Nichols KK, Tomlinson A, Foulks GN, Geerling G, Pepose JS, Kosheleff V, Porreco A, Lemp MA. An objective approach to dry eye disease severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6125-30. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5390. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
- Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Sonmez B, de la Paz MF, Comert E, Charoenrook V, de Araujo AL, Pepose JS, Berg MS, Kosheleff VP, Lemp MA. Clinical utility of objective tests for dry eye disease: variability over time and implications for clinical trials and disease management. Cornea. 2012 Sep;31(9):1000-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60.
- Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003 Oct;22(7):640-50. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008.
- Yang SN, Tai YC, Sheedy JE, Kinoshita B, Lampa M, Kern JR. Comparative effect of lens care solutions on blink rate, ocular discomfort and visual performance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Sep;32(5):412-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00922.x. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
- Dougherty BE, Nichols JJ, Nichols KK. Rasch analysis of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Nov 7;52(12):8630-5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8027.
- Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006 Mar;29(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2005.12.004. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
- Faber E, Golding TR, Lowe R, Brennan NA. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci. 1991 May;68(5):380-4. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199105000-00010.
- Efron N, Morgan PB, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001 Jan;21(1):17-29.
- Pucker AD, Steele K, Rueff E, Franklin QX, McClure K, Savla K, Walline JJ. Contact Lens Adaption in Neophytes. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Mar 1;98(3):266-271. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001662.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014H0074
- K08EY023264 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Contact Lens Comfort
-
NCT03454542CompletedVisual Acuity | Contact Lens Comfort
-
NCT06847230CompletedContact Lens Comfort and Successful Refitting
-
NCT06955403RecruitingContact Lens Comfort
-
NCT02537522CompletedContact Lens Base Curve (BC) Fit and Comfort
-
NCT01684033CompletedMyopia | Hyperopia | Contact Lens Comfort
-
NCT01684046CompletedMyopia | Hyperopia | Contact Lens Comfort
-
NCT03686878CompletedContact Lens Discomfort | Contact Lens | Contact Lens Dryness
-
NCT03305484CompletedContact Lens Complication | Contact Lens Acute Red Eye | Contact Lens Related Corneal Infiltrate (Disorder) | Contact Lens-Induced Corneal Fluorescein Staining
-
NCT06745375Enrolling by invitationContact Lens Wear | Healthy Participants Study | Contact Lens Fit
-
NCT00519948CompletedPatient Comfort | Lens Cleanliness
Clinical Trials on senofilcon A
-
NCT01990664CompletedLapsed Contact Lens Wear
-
NCT03475875CompletedCorrection of Refraction Error | Attenuation of Bright Light
-
NCT03556579Completed
-
NCT02982018Completed
-
NCT03581825Completed