App-guided Training in eFAST Ultrasound
Cost-effectiveness of Mobile App-guided Training in Extended Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (eFAST): A Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Capital Region
-
Copenhagen, Capital Region, Denmark, DK-2100
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- First year medical doctor
- Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior practical ultrasonography experience such as performing independent ultrasonography scans, or participation in any post-graduate ultrasonography courses.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control group
Self-guided training without app-based training (written hand-outs)
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Intervention group
Self-guided training with app-based training
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Video recording of ultrasound skills, rated by consultant radiologists.
Time Frame: Ratings are to be completed within three months of performance.
|
The video-recordings of the technical performances are merged with the ultrasonography screen-recordings to one anonymized video-clip.
These combined video-clips are rated with the OSAUS rating by two raters.
The OSAUS scale (Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills) is used for all performance assessments.
The raters are consultant radiologists.
|
Ratings are to be completed within three months of performance.
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of mobile app guided versus textbook guided training
Time Frame: September 2016
|
September 2016
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: On site via checklist, evaluated on average one day after performance.
|
Participants are given five videocases, to assess for eFAST verifiable pathology.
|
On site via checklist, evaluated on average one day after performance.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Philip M Nilsson, Copenhagen Academy of Medical Education and Simulation
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- H-3-2014-FSP17
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.