Prospective Double-blinded Randomised Comparison of Profix Mobile to Fixed Bearing Knee Replacements
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia, 2444
- Dr Dean Pepper, orthopaedic surgeon private rooms
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients presenting to a single orthopaedic surgeon with knee pathology, who were suitable candidates for total knee arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria:
- refusal to participate
- other simultaneous surgery
- post traumatic osteoarthritis
- prior open knee surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Randomised group 1
This study is looking at a group of patients with knee osteoarthritis or other pathology requiring total knee arthroplasty.
This group of patients were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing prosthesis or a fixed bearing prosthesis.
|
|
|
Experimental: Randomised group 2
This study is looking at a group of patients with knee osteoarthritis or other pathology requiring total knee arthroplasty.
This group of patients were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing prosthesis or a fixed bearing prosthesis.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual pain analogue score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Participants asked to rate their level of pain on a scale
|
6 weeks
|
|
Range of motion
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The range of motion of the joint was assessed in both flexion and extension
|
6 weeks
|
|
Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Questionnaire looking at how the intervention impacts of activities of daily living
|
6 weeks
|
|
X-ray analysis of joint alignment
Time Frame: 5-7 year
|
Using X-rays, the knee was assessed for mechanical and anatomical alignment
|
5-7 year
|
|
Visual pain analogue score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
visual pain analogue score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
|
visual analogue pain score
Time Frame: 5-7 years
|
5-7 years
|
|
|
range of motion
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
range of motion
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
|
range of motion
Time Frame: 5-7 years
|
5-7 years
|
|
|
activities of daily living
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
activities of daily living
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
|
activities of daily living
Time Frame: 5-7 years
|
5-7 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HC12098
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.