A Component Analysis of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
The Impact of Self as Context in the Treatment of Long-term Health Conditions With Acceptance and Commitment Therapy; a Feasibility Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
South Yorkshire
-
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, S10 3TH
- Primary Care Health and Medical Psychology Services
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults of working age (18-65)
- Patients with a primary positive diagnosis of a long-term health condition (The most common conditions referred to the service are Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD], Rheumatoid Arthritis and Epilepsy) where there is a verifiable medical diagnosis supported by the patients General Practitioner (GP) and/or secondary care physician
- Patients with concurrent mental health difficulties (defined as mild - moderate anxiety and/or depression, see table one).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a primary diagnosis of 'medically unexplained symptoms' (MUS) including somatoform disorders (e.g. pain disorder, conversion disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis) and functional somatic syndromes (e.g. irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, non-cardiac chest pain, non-epileptic seizures)
- Mental health diagnoses in addition to mild - moderate anxiety / depression (e.g. personality disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis etc.)
- Patients in receipt of secondary care mental health services
- Patients with severe and enduring mental health difficulties
- Significant risk issues, or current substance misuse
- Previous contact with mental health services (defined as two or more prior episodes of contact without significant change)
- Inpatient admission for mental health difficulties within the last five years
- History of overdoses or other self-injury
- Stated reluctance to engage in psychotherapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Full ACT
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
|
Half of the participants will receive an eight-session ACT intervention whereby each component of the psychological flexibility model will be covered.
Half of the participants will receive an eight-session act intervention whereby each component except self as context will be covered.
|
|
Other: Modified ACT
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
|
Half of the participants will receive an eight-session ACT intervention whereby each component of the psychological flexibility model will be covered.
Half of the participants will receive an eight-session act intervention whereby each component except self as context will be covered.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline psychological flexibility at end of 8-session psychological intervention (approximately 8 weeks) and at post-therapy eight week follow-up (using the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II)
Time Frame: Measure taken at first therapy appointment (baseline), taken again after 8-session intervention (approximately 8 weeks) and again at eight week post-therapy follow-up
|
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (Bond et al., 2011) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire measuring psychological flexibility on a 7-point likert scale
|
Measure taken at first therapy appointment (baseline), taken again after 8-session intervention (approximately 8 weeks) and again at eight week post-therapy follow-up
|
|
Change from baseline self-report 'quality of life' at end of 8-session psychological intervention (approximately 8 weeks) and at post-therapy eight week follow-up (using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale)
Time Frame: Measure taken at first therapy appointment (baseline), taken again after 8-session intervention (approximately 8 weeks) and again at eight week post-therapy follow-up
|
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (Mundt, Marks, Shear, & Greist, 2002) is a 5-item self-report questionnaire measuring functional impairment and disability attributable to the effects of a health condition using a 9-point likert scale
|
Measure taken at first therapy appointment (baseline), taken again after 8-session intervention (approximately 8 weeks) and again at eight week post-therapy follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel C Stockton, University of Sheffield
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 139593
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.