Comparison of Intrapleural Urokinase and Video-Assisted Thorascopic Surgery in the Treatment of Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion in Children (UROVATS)
Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pleural Drainage by Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic With Pleural Drainage by Percutaneous Drain Associated With Urokinase in the Treatment of Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion in Children
Despite the improvement in the technology available for diagnosing and treating empyema, the management of empyema in children remains controversial.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two common technical approach used for pleural effusion drainage in the treatment of childhood empyema.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brussels, Belgium, 1020
- Recruiting
- Queen Fabiola University Children Hospital
-
Contact:
- Nicolas Lefevre, MD
- Email: nicolas.lefevre@huderf.be
-
Principal Investigator:
- Nicolas Lefevre, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients under the age of 17
- pleural fluid depth of at least 15mm, confirmed by ultrasound
at least one of the following severity criteria :
- fever continuing 48h after starting correct antibiotherapy
- respiratory distress
- mediastinal displacement on the chest X-ray
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous drainage by either Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic or pleural drainage by percutaneous drain associated with urokinase- congenital pulmonary disorders with lung function impairment
- congenital pulmonary disorders with lung function impairment
- chronic pulmonary disease associated with lung function impairment
- hemodynamic instability
- congenital immunodeficiency disease
- secondary immune deficiency induced
- hemostasis disorder (contraindication of thrombolytic therapy)
- pregnancy or breastfeeding patient
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Urokinase
insertion of a chest drain with urokinase instillation
|
Other interventions except drainage procedure are the same in both arms
|
|
Other: VATS
primary video-assisted thorascopic surgery Other interventions except drainage procedure are the same in both arms
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
duration of drainage
Time Frame: end of drainage defined per protocole as < 1ml/kg/24h with an expected average time of two days to seven days
|
end of drainage defined per protocole as < 1ml/kg/24h with an expected average time of two days to seven days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Hospital departure with an expected average time of two weeks to one month
|
Hospital departure with an expected average time of two weeks to one month
|
|
Duration of oxygen therapy
Time Frame: up to the end of patient hospitalisation with an expected average time of 48 hours to five days
|
up to the end of patient hospitalisation with an expected average time of 48 hours to five days
|
|
duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy
Time Frame: up to the last intravenous antibiotic injection, minimum of 48 hours for a simple pleural effusion and a minimum of 14 days for an empyema with a maximum of one month
|
up to the last intravenous antibiotic injection, minimum of 48 hours for a simple pleural effusion and a minimum of 14 days for an empyema with a maximum of one month
|
|
Duration of fever > 38.5°C
Time Frame: Up to fever resolution, with an average expected time of five days to 14 days
|
Up to fever resolution, with an average expected time of five days to 14 days
|
|
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to the end of the hospitalisation, until three months corresponding to the end of follow up period
|
Up to the end of the hospitalisation, until three months corresponding to the end of follow up period
|
|
Patient discomfort
Time Frame: Up to chest drain removal with an average expected time of 48 hours up to seven days
|
Up to chest drain removal with an average expected time of 48 hours up to seven days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- P2013/PE1
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.