Effects of a Cognitive Rehabilitation Program: a Neurocognitive Study

July 25, 2014 updated by: Salvador Sarró, MD
Schizophrenia is known to be associated with cognitive dysfunction which increasing evidence suggests has consequences for functional adaptation and which cause difficulties in social re-integration after hospitalization. The investigators propose a large scale, multicentric study (7 centres from the Hermanas Hospitalarias del Sagrado Corazón de Jesús network) aimed at answering outstanding questions concerning the effectiveness of cognitive estimulation therapy for schizophrenic cognitive impairment. Specifically, the study will examine a) issues related to the size of the effect compared to treatment as usual and compared to a control intervention; b) generalizability of improvement to cognitive function and social cognition in daily life; and c) the durability of therapeutic gains after the end of treatment. 192 patients with chronic schizophrenia will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: a computer- assisted cognitive estimulation program (n=64), non-structured time on computer (n=64) and treatment as usual (n=64). A battery of neurocognitive tests of memory and executive function, including 'ecologically valid' measures, will be administered by blind evaluators at baseline, after 6 months of cognitive estimulation, and after 6 months follow-up. Symptoms, social functioning and self-esteem will be also be assessed at baseline, after the treatment and at follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
130

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder fulfilling the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria diagnosis
  • estimated premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ) in the normal range
  • chronic illness (i.e. duration ≥two years)
  • relative clinical stability (i.e. the patients had not experienced any recent exacerbation of symptoms).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of brain trauma
  • alcohol or substance abuse/dependence within the previous six months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Computer-assisted cognitive training
Patients in this arm of the trial carried out computerized online training drawn from the Feskits program (www.feskits.com), chosen to have attention, memory and executive function components. Specifically the sessions included the following exercises: sustained attention (4 minutes), attention/perception (5 minutes), working memory (8 minutes), auditory and visual memory (8 minutes), executive function (10 minutes), language (6 minutes), and games (4 minutes).
Behavioral: Computer-assisted cognitive training
Treatment lasted six months. The CRT and CC conditions consisted of biweekly sessions of 45 minutes. Patients in both conditions trained in groups of up to 8, supervised by a single person. The CRT and CC groups were scheduled at different times. The same personnel supervised both treatment conditions. All supervisors were trained by the coordinator of the study in the technical management of the two conditions.
Other Names:
  • Computer-assisted cognitive training (CRT)
Active Comparator: Computerized active condition
Patients allocated to this condition completed the same number of sessions as the cognitive training group but followed a computerized typing program (www.rapidtyping.com). This had similar design characteristics to the CRT condition, in that it was hierarchically organized with exercise level of difficulty being adjusted to the individual's level of performance and feedback being given at the end of each exercise. Additionally, patients in this condition played computerized games requiring typing (crosswords, word puzzles, etc) and were taught basic internet navigation by a supervisor. Exposure to the computer was of equivalent duration to the CRT condition.
Other: Computerized active condition
Treatment lasted six months. The CRT and CC conditions consisted of biweekly sessions of 45 minutes. Patients in both conditions trained in groups of up to 8, supervised by a single person. The CRT and CC groups were scheduled at different times. The same personnel supervised both treatment conditions. All supervisors were trained by the coordinator of the study in the technical management of the two conditions.
Other Names:
  • Computerized active condition (CC)
Placebo Comparator: Treatment as usual
Patients in this condition participated in their (individually variable) daily rehabilitative activities. Patients allocated to the other two conditions also participated in these activities
Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)
TAU: Patients in this condition participated in their (individually variable) daily rehabilitative activities. Patients allocated to the other two conditions also participated in these activities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Memory test battery
Time Frame: Six months
memory test battery Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT)(Wilson, 1985) a memory test battery and the executive test battery, the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS)(Wilson, 1996)
Six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Salvador Sarró, MD

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
Hermanas Hospitalarias del Sagrado Corazón de Jesús, Spain

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Peter J McKenna, MD, FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation
  • Principal Investigator: Jesus J Gomar, PhD, FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation
  • Study Chair: Edith Pomarol-Clotet, MD, PhD, FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 28, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PR-2009-15
  • PI09/90483 (Other Identifier: Instituto de Salud Carlos III)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Computer-assisted cognitive training

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings