Clinical Effectiveness and Economical Impact of Medical Indoor Environment Counselors Visiting Homes of Asthma Patients (ECENVIR)
Clinical Effectiveness and Economical Impact of Medical Indoor Environment Counselors Visiting Homes of Asthma Patients (ECENVIR Study)
Asthma is one of the most prevalent chronic respiratory diseases, with potential lifethreatening impacts. Indeed, asthma is still responsible for about a thousand deceases per year in France, and constitutes a public health problem in our country as in many countries in the world. The economic burden of asthma is also very high, in terms of health care, and indirect costs including lost work and lost school days.
A few international and French studies have shown a positive clinical impact of Medical Indoor Environment Counselors (MIECs) visiting homes of asthma patients, mainly pediatrics. It has been proposed that MIECs could contribute to reduce patient exposure to many allergens and irritants, among them, house dust mite allergens, formaldehyde or molds. Most of the studies that show a significant decrease of hospitalization or visit in an emergency ward for asthma are monocentric and study the eviction of 1 such identified risk factor. By contrast, meta-analysis underline that additional studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in adults, in a multicentric and controlled manner, with both clinical, environmental and economical endpoints.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Methodology/Study schedule :
A prospective multicenter randomised, open label, controlled trial with blind evaluation of the primary evaluation criterion on three parallel groups of patients.
Procedures :
Home intervention of MIECs that comprise diagnostic of allergen/irritant exposure (after sampling), advices for allergen/irritant avoidance and follow up of advice compliance.
After randomisation and agreement of the patient and the family, the " intervention group " will benefit from a first home intervention of a MIEC during the 4 weeks following inclusion, then a final visit at the end of the study after 12 months.
Two comparative groups will be identified :
- the " control group " who will benefit from a first home intervention of a MIEC but without advices (only audit + sampling), then a final and a complete visit at the end of the study
- a " non intervention " group with no initial visit, but who will benefit from a complete home intervention of a MIEC at the end of the study.
Substantial modification of the 20th of June, 2016 : Modification of the design : change into a 2 parallel groups evaluation Justification: At its meeting of June 1, 2016, considering the inclusion difficulties, the Scientific Council decided to give up the "Control" group.
The study design is then : a prospective multicenter randomised, open label, controlled trial with blind evaluation of the primary evaluation criterion on three parallel groups of patients.
The objective is to recruit 50 to 70 patients by arm.
Expected findings and impact :
If our hypothesis that home intervention of MIECs are cost-effective on asthma control, then it is relevant to include such service in the medical care during the management of asthma patients with a reimbursement by the social security.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aix-en-Provence, France, 13616
- Aix-en-Provence Hospital
-
Bordeaux, France, 33076
- Bordeaux University Hospital
-
Caen, France, 14033
- Caen University hospital
-
Chalon-sur-Saone, France, 71100
- Chalon
-
Chauny, France
- Chauny Hospital
-
Dijon, France, 21079
- Dijon University Hospital
-
Grenoble, France, 38700
- Grenoble University Hospital
-
Lille, France
- Lille UH
-
Macon, France, 71018
- Macon Hospital
-
Marseille, France, 13915
- Marseille University Hospital
-
Marseille, France, 13003
- Marseille European Hospital
-
Nantes, France, 44093
- Nantes university hospital
-
Reims, France, 51100
- Reims University Hospital
-
Rouen, France, 76000
- Rouen University Hospital
-
Vire, France, 14504
- Vire Hospital
-
-
Alsace
-
Strasbourg, Alsace, France
- Strasbourg UH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age greater than or equal to 6 years and less than 45 (<45 years),
- patients with an eligible control level of asthma,
- sensitization to one or more allergens demonstrated during the last 36 months with prick tests (papules with a diameter > 3 mm compared to a negative control or > 50% of positive control) and/or specific IgE detection (> 0.10 U/mL),
- patients > 15 years presenting with a reversibility to ß2-agonists > 200 mL and/or > 12% compared to the initial FEV1 value (test performed at least once in life) or patients ≥ 6 years and ≤ 15 years presenting with a reversibility to ß2-agonists > 200 mL and/or > 12% compared to the initial FEV1 value (at least once in the life) and/or a positive metacholine challenge (at least once in the life),
- patients sleeping > 6 nights per week in the same house
- individuals affiliated to 1 of the 3 French social security (for matching data from French social security via SNIIRAM system),
- Only one patient per dwelling,
- Patient oral consent (written attestation by investigator)
Exclusion Criteria:
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),
- identified occupational asthma,
- Move within the 6 months before home intervention or predicted during the first year of inclusion,
- advices provided during the 2 years before inclusion during a home intervention of a MIEC
- active smokers or smoker who given up smoking less than 5 years ago, with a consumption of more than 10 years of 20 cigarettes/day, OR smoker who given up smoking more than 5 years ago, with a consumption of more than 20 years of 20 cigarettes/day,
- patients < 18 years for whom the parents (or legal guardian) are opposed to the inclusion in ECENVIR study,
- Major people being the object of a legal protection (protection(saving) of justice, guardianship, supervision(guardianship)) and private persons of freedom
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
After randomisation and agreement of the patient and the family, the " intervention group " will benefit from a first home intervention of a MIEC during the 4 weeks following inclusion, then a final visit at the end of the study after 12 months.
|
A first home intervention of a MIEC during the 4 weeks following inclusion, with sampling, audit and advices.
Final home visit at the end of the study after 12 months, with sampling and home audit. For the "intervention group", checking of the advice compliance. For the both comparative groups, delivery of advices. |
|
Active Comparator: Control group
The " control group " is one of the two comparative groups who will benefit from a first home intervention of a MIEC but without advices (only audit + sampling), then a final and a complete visit at the end of the study. This group has been suppressed with the last amendment. But data of the subjects included in this group will be analyzed. |
Final home visit at the end of the study after 12 months, with sampling and home audit. For the "intervention group", checking of the advice compliance. For the both comparative groups, delivery of advices.
A first home intervention of a MIEC during the 4 weeks following inclusion, with sampling, home audit but without any advice.
|
|
Other: Non intervention group
The " non intervention " group is the second comparative group with no initial visit, but will benefit from a complete home intervention of a MIEC at the end of the study.
|
Final home visit at the end of the study after 12 months, with sampling and home audit. For the "intervention group", checking of the advice compliance. For the both comparative groups, delivery of advices. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Therapeutic pressure versus asthma control
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of home interventions of MIECs on asthma control.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Drug consumption and medical care
Time Frame: 12 months
|
One of the secondary objectives is to compare the following after home interventions of MIECs, evolution of drug consumption and medical care needed by asthmatic patients.
|
12 months
|
|
Advices compliance
Time Frame: 12 months
|
One of the secondary objectives is to compare the following after home interventions of MIECs : compliance with advices of MIECs.
|
12 months
|
|
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
|
One of the secondary objectives is to compare the following after home interventions of MIECs : quality of life before and after home intervention.
|
12 months
|
|
Indoor pollutants concentrations
Time Frame: 12 months
|
One of the secondary objectives is to compare the following after home interventions of MIECs : evolution of exposure to indoor pollutants in the intervention group.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jean-Pierre Gangneux, MD, Rennes University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Le Cann P, Paulus H, Glorennec P, Le Bot B, Frain S, Gangneux JP. Home Environmental Interventions for the Prevention or Control of Allergic and Respiratory Diseases: What Really Works. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jan-Feb;5(1):66-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
- Gangneux JP, Bouvrais M, Frain S, Morel H, Deguen S, Chevrier S, Le Cann P. Asthma and Indoor Environment: Usefulness of a Global Allergen Avoidance Method on Asthma Control and Exposure to Molds. Mycopathologia. 2020 Apr;185(2):367-371. doi: 10.1007/s11046-019-00417-9. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 35RC12_9713_ECENVIR
- 2012-A01414-39 (Other Identifier: ID RCB)
- 12/42-875 (Other Identifier: CPP)
- 13.424 (Other Identifier: CCTIRS)
- 913428 (Other Identifier: CNIL)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.