Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
- Duke University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All adult patients (≥18 years) who present for initial implantable port placement during the recruitment period will be eligible to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who cannot provide informed consent for the procedure will be excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Suture
Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture
|
Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture
|
|
Experimental: Octylcyanoacrylate
Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate
|
Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Complication of Wound Dehiscence
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To compare complication rates, including wound dehiscence and infection rates between implantable port incisions closed with topical skin adhesive versus absorbable subcuticular sutures.
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Complication of Infection
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To compare complication rates, including wound dehiscence and infection rates between implantable port incisions closed with topical skin adhesive versus absorbable subcuticular sutures.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Healing-incision Cosmesis Score by Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To compare resultant cosmesis with topic skin adhesive closure versus suture closure.
Scale is 1-10 with 1 as the best possible outcome and 10 is the worst possible outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Closure Time
Time Frame: Baseline
|
To compare closure time and associated costs between these two methods of skin closure.
|
Baseline
|
|
Closure Materials Cost
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Per unit cost for suture and octylcyanoacrylate
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Charles Kim, MD, Duke University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00056064
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.