ALPPS Versus PVE/PL (LIGRO)

August 12, 2014 updated by: Regionalt Cancercentrum Väst

Comparison of Two Different Models of Liver Growth Stimulation in Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastatic Disease, (LIGRO Trial) Enabling Liver Resection

Study Title Comparison of two different models of liver growth stimulation in advanced colorectal liver metastatic disease, (LIGRO Trial) enabling liver resection

Methodology Scandinavian Multiple Center Randomized Registry Based Clinical Trial

Study duration The planned duration of study participation for an individual subject from inclusion to follow-up are 3 years

Primary investigator:

Per Sandstrom (Linköping)

Number of subjects 100 patients randomized in a 1:1 randomization

Diagnosis and main inclusion criteria Patients with colorectal liver metastasis requiring liver resection, but are not resectable in one step because of a future liver remnant/standardized total liver volume of < 30 % extrahepatic metastatic disease is not an exclusion criteria if they can be addressed surgically in the future

Overall goal To evaluate if the ALPPS approach is superior to PVE in enabling patients, primarily unresectable due to inadequate FLR, to be resected and reach an R0 situation with an acceptable level of complications and perioperative mortality.

To evaluate if the ALPPS approach increases the growth rate of the liver compared to portal embolization or portal ligation leading to a shorter treatment period.

In addition the investigators aim to study if ALPPS may reach these goals without detectable or improved differences in tumor activity (PFS and OS), but with a shorter recovery and a higher proportion of patients reaching R0.

Hypothesis A higher proportion of patients can be resected with ALPPS counted as rate resected compared to the previously established methods with portal ligation or embolization.

This increased resection rate will not reduce the R0 rate, or increase the rate of Clavien grade 4 complication or higher (H0).

The ALPPS approach will increase the growth rate compared to portal embolization/ligation measured one week after the primary intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Departments of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Peter Noergard Larsen, PhD
  • Norway
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Recruiting
        • Rikshospitalet Oslo University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bard Rosok, MD, PhD
  • Sweden
      • Gothenburg, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Magnus Rizell
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Magnus Rizell, MD, PhD
      • Linkoping, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Per Sandstrom, PhD, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Per Sandstrom, MD, PhD
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Surgery, University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gert Lindell, MD, PhD
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Karolinska University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Bengt Isaksson, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bengt Isaksson, MD, PhD
      • Umea, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Norrland University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Bjarne Andnor, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bjarne Andnor, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. By liver tumor board found accepted for inclusion
  2. Patients with a tumor burden of colorectal liver metastasis
  3. Signed informed content
  4. Colorectal liver metastatic disease with an estimated FLR/sTLV of <30%
  5. Primary tumor and any extrahepatic disease possible to resect in patients with liver first approach or after resection of primary tumor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cirrhosis
  2. Significant comorbidity rendering subjects unsuitable for major surgery
  3. Progressive disease after preoperative oncological treatment
  4. Age<18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: In-situ split with portal vein ligature
In-situ liver split at time when portal vein ligature is performed
Procedure: In-situ split
The portal branches to the diseased side should be completely divided. The bile duct to the diseased side should not be divided. The parenchyma should be transected all the way through the transection plane and place a plastic sheet on the diseased transection surface.
Other Names:
  • ALPPS
Active Comparator: Portal embolization or ligation
Intervention: Preoperative portal embolization (+/-ablation) followed by liver resection, or local resections and/or ablations followed by lobectomy, two-stage hepatectomy
Procedure: Portal embolization or ligation
Portal vein embolization is performed according to the intervention used at the different sites.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical success rate, the rate of liver resection in each study arm
Time Frame: 8 weeks

For both the ALPPS and the portal vein embolization/ligation arm, resection is not allowed within the study if the patient is not reaching a future liver remnant of 30%.

For both groups carcinomatosis or more metastases making aiming radical resections impossible will be seen as failures.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Liver growth rate
Time Frame: At one week after primary intervention
Liver growth is measured with regard to the future liver remnant by measuring the kinetic growth rate by performing repeated CT or MRI at one week after portal vein embolization/ligation or after the first step of the ALPPS procedure.
At one week after primary intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radical resection rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Radical resection at resection line according to histopathology
8 weeks
Composite complication rate
Time Frame: 1 month after final surgery
Overall complications will be analysed as a composite endpoint (CEP) including: ascites, postresectional liver failure, bile leak, intra abdominal bleeding, intraabdominal abscess and mortality, all with a Clavien score of at least 3
1 month after final surgery
Treatment time
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Treatment time in days from PVE/PL or date of ALPPS op 1 until date of leaving hospital after final surgery.
8 weeks
Progression free survival
Time Frame: 24 months
Progression free survival according to randomization group.
24 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after last inclusion
Overall survival after inclusion
Up to 24 months after last inclusion
Quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months post final resection
Quality of life is measured by EORTC QLQ C-30 EQ5D ar 1,6,12,24 months.
24 months post final resection
Health economy
Time Frame: At 8 weeks
An analysis with regard to hospitalisation rate and number of days in-ward between randomization arm.
At 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Regionalt Cancercentrum Väst

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SweLiv 1-2014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings