High Fresh Gas Flow After Intubation

May 12, 2015 updated by: Erland Ostberg, Region Västmanland

High Fresh Gas Flow After Intubation - A Randomized Clinical Trial

Atelectasis is common during and after general anesthesia. Atelectasis develops early if preoxygenation with 100% oxygen is used and continuously used during induction until endotracheal intubation. The investigators hypothesize that a rapid anti-preoxygenation maneuver immediately after confirming a successful intubation, reduces the area of atelectasis as investigated by computed tomography compared to a standard procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
    • Västmanland
      • Köping, Västmanland, Sweden, 731 30
        • Landstinget Västmanland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy patients, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-II
  • Patients scheduled for orthopaedic day case surgery in general anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA class III or higher
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) 30 or higher
  • Arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) <94% breathing air
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Haemoglobin <100g/L
  • Known or anticipated difficult airway and/or intubation
  • Active smokers and ex-smokers with a history of more than 6 pack years
  • Need for interscalene or supraclavicular regional anaesthesia with risk of phrenic nerve paralysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control group, conventional ventilatory settings

Handling of the airway during induction and intubation is performed in a conventional manner.

Initial ventilatory settings are also done in a conventional manner.
Procedure: Control group, conventional ventilatory settings

Handling of the airway during induction and intubation is performed in a conventional manner.

Initial ventilatory settings are also done in a conventional manner. As soon as correct position of the endotracheal tube is confirmed, controlled ventilation is started with a tidal volume of 7 mL/kg ideal body weight, PEEP 6 or 8 cm H2O (8 if BMI >25) and a respiratory frequency of 10. The fresh gas flow is set to 1 Liter per minute with an oxygen mixture of 40%, aiming for an inspired FiO2 of 30-35%.

Unless the patient´s SpO2 falls below 90%, the FiO2 remains unchanged throughout the procedure.
Active Comparator: High fresh gas flow, high minute ventilation

Handling of the airway during induction and intubation is performed in a conventional manner.

Immediately after confirming a successful intubation the effect of preoxygenation is eliminated with an anti-preoxygenation maneuver.
Procedure: High fresh gas flow, high minute ventilation

Handling of the airway during induction and intubation is performed in a conventional manner.

Immediately after confirming a successful intubation, the effect of preoxygenation is eliminated with a fresh gas flow of 10 L/min of air, delivered with volume controlled ventilation consisting of tidal volumes of approximately 15 ml/kg ideal body weight, a positive expiratory pressure of 10 cm H20 and a respiratory frequency of 10. As soon as the end tidal O2 reaches 25%, the ventilator settings are adjusted to normal values (same as in the control group), i.e. tidal volume 7 mL/kg ideal body weight, PEEP 6 or 8 cm H2O (8 if BMI >25). The mixture of oxygen in the fresh gas is increased to 40% and the fresh gas flow is set to 1 Liter per minute, aiming for an inspired FiO2 of 30-35%.

Unless the patient´s SpO2 falls below 90%, the FiO2 remains unchanged throughout the procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Atelectasis
Time Frame: Within 1-2 hours, just before emergence from anesthesia
The area of atelectasis in the lungs is assessed by computed tomography (CT) 10 mm above the dome of the right diaphragm and expressed in cm2 and as % of the total lung area in the particular scan.
Within 1-2 hours, just before emergence from anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Arterial blood gases
Time Frame: Within 2-3 hours perioperatively
Within 2-3 hours perioperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Region Västmanland

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Mats Enlund, MD, PhD, Landstinget i Värmland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 1, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 12, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Dnr 2012/335

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings