Psychosis and Affective Research Domains and Intermediate Phenotypes (PARDIP)

September 18, 2019 updated by: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
The objective of this multi-site research collaboration is to test the manifestation and distribution of biological markers for psychosis and affect dimensions across the schizophrenia/bipolar (SZ-BD) diagnostic boundary, and to examine heritability and genetic associations for these biological markers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The B-SNIP research consortium previously obtained dense phenotypes across the psychosis spectrum in an effort to observe features both (i) distinctive to and (ii) shared between DSM-type categorical diagnoses. Despite the broad range of extra-clinical phenotypes, we had limited success finding clinical SZ-BD diagnosis-specific features; instead, most phenotypes were distributed continuously across DSM diagnoses. To describe more biologically homogeneous groups, therefore, we combined all psychosis probands and implemented a multi-stage analysis procedure, beginning with identification of psychosis biomarkers (variables with the largest effect sizes for differentiating psychosis and healthy groups) including cognitive, electrophysiological, and oculo-motor measures ('classical' endophenotypes). We then estimated the number of subgroups that efficiently optimized variance among the biomarkers (n=3) and differentiated the individual psychosis cases into these subgroups. Subsequently, the subgroups were tested for biological uniqueness using meaningful external validators (structural and functional brain imaging, social functioning, and familial data). Given the neurobiological distinctiveness of these subgroups, we called them psychosis Biotypes. DSM diagnoses were distributed across all Biotypes. Compared to DSM diagnoses, Biotype membership enhanced group separations on biomarkers. These results indicate that groups of psychosis cases can be generated with homogeneous phenotypic characteristics independent of DSM diagnoses. The proposed study aims to further develop Biotype definitions and demonstrate that psychosis Biotypes constructed from a dense biomarker panel (i) are replicable, (ii) neurobiologically distinctive, and (iii) have unique genetic characteristics.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
113

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be comprised of individuals between the ages of 18-60 years old who meet DSM-IV criteria for Bipolar I disorder, read/speak/understand the English language, and are deemed capable of completing the study procedures by the research investigators.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must provide consent to participate after being fully informed about the study procedures and the information to be collected
  • Males and females
  • Ages 18-60 years old
  • All races and ethnicities
  • Probands: Must meet DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I disorder with or without lifetime history of psychosis; Healthy Controls: Must have no personal history of any psychotic or mood disorder, or a family history of psychotic or recurrent mood disorder among their first-degree relatives
  • Must be judged to be capable of completing the study procedures by study investigators
  • Must be able to read, speak, and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An estimated IQ<70
  • Major neurological or cognitive disorder (e.g., seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, cerebrovascular disease, pervasive developmental disorder)
  • Serious medical, neuro-ophthalmological, or neurological illness that could affect CNS functioning (e.g., decompensated cardiovascular disease, decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, late stages of diabetes, AIDS)
  • DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol or illicit substance abuse within 1 month, or alcohol or substance dependence within 3 months, or extensive history of past substance use
  • Women who are pregnant (due to unknown risks related to MRI exposure)
  • Presence of medical (e.g., artificial joints, brain aneurism clips, surgical pins, rods, wires, implants) or non-medical (e.g., metal piercing) irremovable metallic objects on/inside body (due to MRI-relevant risks)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Bipolar I disorder, with psychosis
Individuals diagnosed with Bipolar I disorder, with psychotic features
Bipolar I disorder, without psychosis
Individuals diagnosed with Bipolar I disorder, without psychotic features
Healthy Controls
Must have no personal history of any psychotic or mood disorder, or a family history of psychotic or recurrent mood disorder among their first-degree relatives

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Differences in those with Bipolar disorder with psychosis, without psychosis, and healthy controls on functional and structural brain imaging, neurocognitive assessments, and neurophysiological tests
Time Frame: One day
One day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in those with Bipolar disorder with psychosis, without psychosis, and healthy controls on clinical assessment questionnaires
Time Frame: One day
The investigators will assess clustering of probands and relatives across composite biomarkers independent of diagnostic status using multivariate taxometric procedures.
One day

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in those with Bipolar disorder with psychosis, without psychosis, and healthy controls in DNA and dermal biopsy sampling
Time Frame: One day
The investigators will collect DNA from all proband and relative subjects and collaboratively sequence the genetic material to associate genes with specific biomarkers and composite Biotype definitions. We will also collect plasma and cellular specimens to bank for analysis of additional molecular biomarkers unique to each Biotype.
One day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
University of Georgia
Hartford Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Carol A Tamminga, M.D., UT Southwestern Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 18, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MH077851
  • 1R01MH096913-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings