Improving Opioid Safety in Veterans Using Collaborative Care and Decision Support (OPTI)

June 29, 2017 updated by: Karen Seal, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center
The investigators propose to develop a novel intervention that targets the system (Collaborative Care), PCP (computerized decision support for opioid therapy) and veteran (CM-delivered MI) to reduce problematic prescription opioid use and encourage non-opioid pain management alternatives.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators will develop and test the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a Collaborative Care intervention in which one of two Care Managers delivering both interventions will assist primary care providers (PCPs) by using Motivational Interviewing to communicate computer-based ATHENA-OT (opioid therapy) decision support guidelines to veterans with chronic pain. Specifically, after honing the intervention, the investigators will conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of Collaborative Care/Motivational Interviewing in 100 veterans (ages 18 and older) with chronic pain in primary care who are prescribed opioid pain medications and exhibit at least one "high-risk" opioid use behavior (e.g. obtaining early opioid refills, etc.). Using ATHENA-OT decision support, PCPs will make guideline-concordant recommendations to all enrolled study patients and initiate a Pain Care Plan. Veterans randomized to Collaborative Care, will have one MI session with their assigned study Care Manager followed by 3 Care Manager-delivered telephone MI/monitoring sessions; patients randomized to the Attention Control arm will have one brief session with their assigned Care Manager, followed by 3 Care Manager-delivered neutral telephone sessions

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • San Francisco VA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current Male or Female patient at San Francisco VA Medical Center or affiliated VA clinics
  • Must be older than 18 years
  • Chronic musculoskeletal pain of at least 6 months duration and
  • Prescribed one or more opioid pain medication for more than three months and
  • Evidence of being a high-risk opioid user as determined by PI, electronic medical record, and study measures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speakers
  • Plans to relocate within 6 months; not able to come to San Francisco VA Medical Center for three in-person visits
  • Cancer or other terminal illness involving palliative care with opioid medications
  • Serious or untreated mental illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Attention Control
The neutral 10-15 minute visit with the Care Manager will consist of a brief review of ATHENA-OT safety education and the patient's Pain Care Plan. The CM will answer patient questions, but will avoid using Motivational Interviewing communication. The Care Manager will review upcoming telephone check-in and assessment sessions.
Behavioral: Attention Control
Experimental: Collaborative Care
Collaborative Care intervention in which one of two Care Managers delivering both interventions will assist primary care providers (PCPs) by using Motivational Interviewing to communicate computer-based ATHENA-OT (opioid therapy) decision support guidelines to veterans with chronic pain.
Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of augmenting ATHENA-OT decision support with a Collaborative Care intervention.
Time Frame: 20 weeks post baseline
  • PCPs and the CM in the Collaborative Care arm will report greater self-efficacy in communicating ATHENA-OT pain management recommendations and in developing a Pain Care Plan with chronic pain patients
  • The CM will conduct MI communication with high fidelity.
  • Veterans in the Collaborative Care arm will report greater satisfaction with pain-related care.
20 weeks post baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of ATHENA-OT decision support plus Collaborative Care (CC) to improve prescription opioid safety and adherence to non-opioid pain management alternatives among primary care patients.
Time Frame: 20 weeks post baseline

Compared to ATHENA-OT plus Attention Control:

H2.a. Veterans randomized to Collaborative Care (CC) will be more likely to achieve a decrease in opioid risk behavior that is sustained during an 8-week post-intervention period of no contact.

H2.b. Veterans randomized to CC are more likely to initiate and sustain ≥ 1 non-opioid strategies.

H2.c. Veterans randomized to CC are more likely to report sustained improvements in pain disability.

H2.d. Substance use disorders and treatment will moderate CC efficacy; Care Manager MI-consistent communication in the CC arm will correlate with reduced opioid risk behavior in veterans.
20 weeks post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Karen Seal, MD, MPH, SFVAMC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13-11892
  • R34AT008319-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings