Comparative Study, Safety and Efficacy, Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Device, Model M4 Model S2 in Neovascular Glaucoma
Comparative Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Drainage Device, Model M4 (High Density Porous Polyethylene) and the Model S2 (Polypropylene) in Patients With Neovascular Glaucoma
Objective: Prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Device, model M4 compared with the model S2.
Method: Mexican patients with Neovascular Glaucoma will be randomly included for each group (M4 and S2). They will be operated using conventional techniques and creating a sub-episcleral tunnel to place the valve's tube in the anterior chamber. They will be monitoring for one year and the results will be evaluated with respect to a postoperative reduction in pressure, changes in visual acuity, the need for drugs and complications, in addition to the demographic characteristics of each group.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with diagnosis of Neovascular glaucoma
- High IOP despite topical treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women
- Mental disorders
- Previous glaucoma surgery
- Patients older than 18 years
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: S2
Surgically Implant an Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Device Model S2 in Neovascular Glaucoma Patients and evaluate the IOP evolution, complications and need for medication to control IOP
|
Surgically Implant an Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Device Models S2 and M4, evaluare IOP evolution, complications and need for medication to control IOP
|
|
Active Comparator: M4
Surgically Implant an Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Device Model M4 in Neovascular Glaucoma Patients and evaluate the IOP evolution, complications and need for medication to control IOP
|
Surgically Implant an Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Device Models S2 and M4, evaluare IOP evolution, complications and need for medication to control IOP
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Number of participants with adverse effects
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Intraocular pressure
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Felix Gil-Carrasco, MD, 52 55 10841400
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- GL-12-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.