Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair. (PROSPERE4)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair: Functional and Anatomical Results at Four Years Follow-up
The primary objective of this study is to compare with PFDI-20 questionnaire the functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and vaginal mesh surgery in the treatment of symptomatic exteriorised cystocele up to 4 years after surgery.
The secondary objectives of this study are the following:
- to compare the two techniques for anatomical results based on the clinical evaluation of patients with POP-Q.
- to overall quality of life assessment and expectations of patients.
- to compare the two techniques for the long-term safety. The evaluation will focus on the adverse effects of long-term sexual and genital symptoms, urinary and digestive functional symptoms, and chronic pelvic pain.
- to compare the improvement of the functional outcome assessed by PFDI-20 questionnaire (matched-analysis before versus after).
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Annecy, France, 74374
- Sébatien BLANC
-
Clamart, France, 92140
- Hôpital Antoine Béclère
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
- CHU Estaing
-
Grande-Synthe, France, 59760
- GCS Flandre Maritime
-
La Rochelle, France, 17019
- CH La Rochelle Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique
-
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94275
- Hôpital BICETRE / Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique
-
Lille, France, 59037
- CHRU de Lille - Service de Gynécologie médico chirurgicale
-
Nîmes, France, 30029
- CHU de Nîmes
-
Paris, France, 75571
- Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix St-Simon
-
Poissy, France, 78303
- CHI Poissy-St-Germain / Service de gynécologie
-
Poitiers, France, 86000
- CHU De Poitiers
-
Strasbourg, France, 67000
- Hôpital de Hautepierre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All the patients included in the PROSPERE study will be included in the PROSPERE-4 study. The inclusion criterias for the PROSPERE study are:
- Written informed consent
- insured under the French social security system
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the requirements of this protocol, including the presence of any condition (physical, mental, or social) that is likely to affect the subject's ability to comply with the study protocol
- Participation in another trial
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
|
|
|
Other: vaginal mesh surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PFDI-20 score
Time Frame: 4 years
|
The patient-reported outcome of the intervention will be evaluated using the symptom score calculated using the PFDI-20.
It is a self-administered questionnaire on symptoms of prolapse
|
4 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jean-Philippe LUCOT, MD,, University Hospital, Lille
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lucot JP, Fritel X, Debodinance P, Bader G, Cosson M, Giraudet G, Collinet P, Rubod C, Fernandez H, Fournet S, Lesavre M, Deffieux X, Faivre E, Trichot C, Demoulin G, Jacquetin B, Savary D, Botchorichvili R, Campagne Loiseau S, Salet-Lizee D, Villet R, Gadonneix P, Delporte P, Ferry P, Aucouturier JS, Thirouard Y, de Tayrac R, Fatton B, Wagner L, Nadeau C, Wattiez A, Garbin O, Youssef Azer Akladios C, Thoma V, Baulon Thaveau E, Saussine C, Hermieu JF, Delmas V, Blanc S, Tardif D, Fauconnier A; GROG (groupe de recherche en gynecologie et obstetrique). [PROSPERE randomized controlled trial: laparoscopic sacropexy versus vaginal mesh for cystocele POP repair]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Jun;42(4):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 22. French.
- Lucot JP, Cosson M, Bader G, Debodinance P, Akladios C, Salet-Lizee D, Delporte P, Savary D, Ferry P, Deffieux X, Campagne-Loiseau S, de Tayrac R, Blanc S, Fournet S, Wattiez A, Villet R, Ravit M, Jacquetin B, Fritel X, Fauconnier A. Safety of Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Sacropexy for Cystocele Repair: Results of the Prosthetic Pelvic Floor Repair Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.044. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014_03
- 2014-A00258-39 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.