Study of Tedizolid Phosphate in Adolescents With Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infection (cSSTI) (MK-1986-012)

July 12, 2019 updated by: Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC

Phase 3 Study of IV to Oral 6-Day Tedizolid Phosphate Compared With 10-day Comparator in Subjects 12 to < 18 Years With cSSTI.

The purpose of the study is to compare the safety of intravenous (IV) and/or oral 6-day 200 mg tedizolid phosphate with 10-day comparator in participants 12 to <18 years with cSSTI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A randomized, single-blind, multicenter, Phase 3 study of IV and/or oral tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once per day for 6 days compared with IV and/or oral comparator for 10 days for the treatment of cSSTI, also known as acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, in participants 12 to <18 years. cSSTI includes major cutaneous abscess, cellulitis/erysipelas, and wound infection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females 12 years to <18 years
  • Adequate venous access for IV administration of study drug for at least 24 hours (for participants receiving IV medication) and collection of protocol-specified blood samples
  • Local symptoms must have started within 7 days before Study Day -1
  • cSSTI meeting at least 1 of the clinical syndrome definitions.
  • Suspected or documented Gram-positive infection from baseline Gram stain or culture.
  • Parent/legally authorized representative (LAR) able to give informed consent and willing and able to comply with all required study procedures. Assent is also required of children who in the Investigator's judgment are capable of understanding the nature of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncomplicated minor skin and skin structure infections such as pustules, folliculitis, furuncles, minor abscesses (small volume of suppuration not surrounded by cellulitis/erysipelas), impetiginous lesions, superficial or limited cellulitis/erysipelas, and minor wound associated foreign body reactions (eg, stitch abscesses)
  • Known bacteremia, severe sepsis or septic shock
  • Recent history of opportunistic infections where the underlying cause of these infections is still active (eg, leukemia, transplant, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome)
  • Hypersensitivity to tedizolid phosphate or any component in the formulation
  • Hypersensitivity to all of the comparator drugs; hypersensitivity to a comparator drug does not preclude participation if an alternative comparator can be used
  • For participants with wound infections: history of hypersensitivity to ceftazidime, aztreonam, or any component of the aztreonam formulation, if aztreonam adjunctive therapy is required; history of hypersensitivity to metronidazole or any component of the formulation, if metronidazole adjunctive therapy is required
  • Needs oral administration of methotrexate, topotecan, irinotecan or rosuvastatin, during administration of oral study drug.
  • Uses monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, buspirone, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin 5 hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists (triptans) within 14 days prior to study drug administration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Tedizolid Phosphate
Tedizolid Phosphate IV and/or oral 200 mg once per day for 6 days. Participants with gram-negative wound infection may receive aztreonam (IV) and/or metronidazole (IV or oral).
Drug: Tedizolid Phophate
Tedizolid Phophate 200 mg, IV and/or oral for 6 days
Other Names:
  • SIVEXTRO®
  • MK-1986
  • TR701-122
Drug: Aztreonam
In countries and/or sites where aztreonam is available, adjunctive aztreonam (IV) may be initiated on Day 1 or during the first 3 days of treatment if the participant is determined or suspected to have an infection with gram-negative aerobic pathogens.
Other Names:
  • Azactam, Cayston
Drug: Metronidazole
Metronidazole (IV or oral) may be initiated on Day 1 or during the first 3 days of treatment if the participant is determined or suspected to have an infection with anaerobic pathogens.
Other Names:
  • Flagyl, Metro
Active Comparator: Antibiotic comparator drug
IV and/or oral antibiotic comparator drug for 10 days. Participants with gram-negative wound infection may receive aztreonam (IV) and/or metronidazole (IV or oral).
Drug: Aztreonam
In countries and/or sites where aztreonam is available, adjunctive aztreonam (IV) may be initiated on Day 1 or during the first 3 days of treatment if the participant is determined or suspected to have an infection with gram-negative aerobic pathogens.
Other Names:
  • Azactam, Cayston
Drug: Metronidazole
Metronidazole (IV or oral) may be initiated on Day 1 or during the first 3 days of treatment if the participant is determined or suspected to have an infection with anaerobic pathogens.
Other Names:
  • Flagyl, Metro
Drug: Antibiotic comparator
Antibiotic comparator drug, IV and/or orally for 10 days. Antibiotic comparator included the following: Vancomycin, Linezolid, Clindamycin, Flucloxacillin, Cefazolin, Cephalexin.
Other Names:
  • Vancomycin: Vancocin, Firvanq, Lyphocin; Linezolid: Zyvox; Clindamycin: Cleocin; Flucloxacillin: Floxapen, Flopen, Staphylex; Cefazolin: Ancef, Kefzol; Cephalexin: Keflex, Zartan, Panixine, Biocef

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events on Tedizolid Phosphate and Comparator Drugs
Time Frame: Up to 40 days (including 30-day follow-up)
An adverse event (AE) refers to a treatment-emergent adverse event (TE-AE). A TE-AE is any AE that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug.
Up to 40 days (including 30-day follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Investigator's Assessment Indicating Clinical Success at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit (Intent to Treat Analysis Set)
Time Frame: TOC Visit: 18-25 days after first drug infusion
Investigator's assessment of clinical success is defined as (1) resolution or near resolution of most disease-specific signs and symptoms, (2)absence or near resolution of regional or systemic signs of infection (lymphadenopathy, fever, >10% immature neutrophils, abnormal white blood cell count), if present at baseline, and (3) no new signs, symptoms, or complications attributable to the infection under study so no further antibiotic therapy is required for the treatment of the primary lesion.
TOC Visit: 18-25 days after first drug infusion
Number of Participants With Investigator's Assessment Indicating Clinical Success at TOC Visit (Clinically Evaluable-Test of Cure [CE-TOC] Analysis Set)
Time Frame: TOC Visit: 18-25 days after first drug infusion
Investigator's assessment of clinical success is defined as (1) resolution or near resolution of most disease-specific signs and symptoms, (2)absence or near resolution of regional or systemic signs of infection (lymphadenopathy, fever, >10% immature neutrophils, abnormal white blood cell count), if present at baseline, and (3) no new signs, symptoms, or complications attributable to the infection under study so no further antibiotic therapy is required for the treatment of the primary lesion.
TOC Visit: 18-25 days after first drug infusion
Number of Participants With Early Clinical Responses Measured by Lesion Reduction
Time Frame: 48-72 hr after first drug infusion
Early clinical response is defined as ≥20% reduction from baseline lesion area (defined as length multiplied by the width of the erythema, edema, and/or induration [EEI]) at the 48-72 hour (hr) visit.
48-72 hr after first drug infusion
Number of Participants With Investigator's Assessment Indicating Clinical Success at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit (Intent to Treat Analysis Set)
Time Frame: EOT Visit: up to 13 days after first drug infusion
Investigator's assessment of clinical success is defined as (1) resolution or near resolution of most disease-specific signs and symptoms, (2)absence or near resolution of regional or systemic signs of infection (lymphadenopathy, fever, >10% immature neutrophils, abnormal white blood cell count), if present at baseline, and (3) no new signs, symptoms, or complications attributable to the infection under study so no further antibiotic therapy is required for the treatment of the primary lesion.
EOT Visit: up to 13 days after first drug infusion
Number of Participants With Investigator's Assessment Indicating Clinical Success at EOT Visit (Clinically Evaluable-End of Therapy [CE-EOT] Analysis Set)
Time Frame: EOT Visit: up to 13 days after first drug infusion
Investigator's assessment of clinical success is defined as (1) resolution or near resolution of most disease-specific signs and symptoms, (2) absence or near resolution of regional or systemic signs of infection (lymphadenopathy, fever, >10% immature neutrophils, abnormal white blood cell count), if present at baseline, and (3) no new signs, symptoms, or complications attributable to the infection under study so no further antibiotic therapy is required for the treatment of the primary lesion.
EOT Visit: up to 13 days after first drug infusion

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Lesion Size
Time Frame: Baseline and TOC visit (18 to 25 days after infusion)
Lesion size is the area in cm^2 of erythema, edema or induration. A negative number corresponds to a decrease in lesion size.
Baseline and TOC visit (18 to 25 days after infusion)
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tedizolid
Time Frame: Day 1 at 5-80 minutes (min) and 4-12 hrs post-infusion or 2 samples collected between 4-12 hrs after oral dose, at least 60 min apart; at 48-72 hrs: within 60 min prior to administration and 4-12 hrs after administration; and anytime between Day 7 and 9
The Cmax of tedizolid in plasma after the last dose was estimated based on population pharmacokinetic analysis of observed pharmacokinetic data. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis at specific time points.
Day 1 at 5-80 minutes (min) and 4-12 hrs post-infusion or 2 samples collected between 4-12 hrs after oral dose, at least 60 min apart; at 48-72 hrs: within 60 min prior to administration and 4-12 hrs after administration; and anytime between Day 7 and 9
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) of Tedizolid
Time Frame: Day 1 at 5-80 min and 4-12 hrs post-infusion or 2 samples collected between 4-12 hrs after oral dose, at least 60 min apart; at 48-72 hrs: within 60 min prior to administration and 4-12 hrs after administration; and anytime between Day 7 and 9
AUC0-24h is a measure of the total tedizolid exposure in the plasma from the dose to 24 hours after last dose. AUC0-24h was estimated based on population pharmacokinetic analysis of observed pharmacokinetic data. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis at specific time points.
Day 1 at 5-80 min and 4-12 hrs post-infusion or 2 samples collected between 4-12 hrs after oral dose, at least 60 min apart; at 48-72 hrs: within 60 min prior to administration and 4-12 hrs after administration; and anytime between Day 7 and 9

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 25, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 17, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 17, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 27, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1986-012
  • TR701-122 (Other Identifier: Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC Protocol Number)
  • 2014-004023-40 (EudraCT Number)
  • MK-1986-012 (Other Identifier: Merck)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings