Product Validation Study of RightSpot Infant pH Indicator for Rapid Bedside Verification of Proper Nasogastric (NG) Tube Placement in Newborn Intensive Care (NICU) Patients

October 28, 2014 updated by: RightBio Metrics

Objectives:

  1. To validate the accuracy of pH measurements of gastric fluid by comparing the readings from the RightSpot Infant pH Indicator to a standard clinically approved pH monitor
  2. To determine what percentage of time the RightSpot Infant pH Indicator could have been used to determine the proper placement of the NG tube prior to feedings
  3. To establish normative pH values for neonates

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

RightBio Metrics has developed an indicator that rapidly checks gastric pH by aspirating gastric contents into the indicator through a nasogastric (NG) or orogastric (OG), causing a color change on the indicator. The color change represents various pH levels. Most Newborn Intensive Care Units require that NG/OG placement be confirmed after initial insertion and prior to any use. The purpose of this study is to validate the accuracy of pH measurement of gastric fluid by comparing the reading from the RightSpot Infant pH Indicator to a standard clinically approved pH monitor, and to determine what percentage of time the RightSpot Infant pH Indicator could have been used to determine the proper placement of the NG/OG tube prior to use. The gastric pH measurements will be analyzed to determine the normative pH values for neonates.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85014
        • Recruiting
        • Banner Good Samaritan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gregory Martin, MD, FAAP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 months to 9 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Infants in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit with an NG Tube

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit with an NG Tube

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with congenital or genetic abnormalities
  • Infants with gastroschesis
  • Infants with upper airway abnormalities
  • Infants receiving any supplement or medication know to alter pH gastric contents
  • Infants receiving Enfamil liquid human milk fortification
  • Infant who are NPO status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the gastric pH measurement obtained from the RightSpot Indicator to the gastric pH measurement obtained from an approved pH monitor to determine the agreement and accuracy of the two modes of measurements.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
To determine the percentage of samples obtained by the RightSpot pH Indicator that could have been used to assist in determining proper placement of the NG tube prior to use. (% of collected samples vs. uncollected)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
To determine the percentage of samples obtained by the RightSpot pH Indicator that could have been used in determining proper placement of the NG tube prior to use.(% of sample accuracy)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
The gastric pH measurements will be collected and analyzed to determine the normative pH values for neonates
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Gestation age at birth
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Adjusted gestational age at the time of testing
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Infants weight at the time of testing
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Time infant last ate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Residual amount (ml) at the time of testing
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
pH reading from gastric secretions
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Medications given which effect pH of gastric contents
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
RightBio Metrics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 31, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RBM-2014-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings