Novel Cervical Retraction Device
Patient Discomfort With a Novel Suction Based Cervical Retractor Compared to the Traditional Cervical Tenaculum
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84106
- University of Utah, School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects presenting for IUD insertion or endometrial biopsy
- Able to consent for study in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria:
- Post-menopausal
- Current pregnancy
- Cervical abnormalities (cervical polyp, cervical lesion, or irregularity)
- Use of narcotics or Benzodiazepines prior to procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard Cervical Tenaculum
Single tooth tenaculum, pierces the tissue of the cervix to allow provider to stabilize and place traction on the cervical cal/uterus
|
|
|
Experimental: Bioceptive Cervical Retraction Device
Suction based method for stabilizing the cervix and uterus.
Achieves suction 360 degrees around cervical os creating a portal through which instruments can be passed into the cervical canal and uterus.
Provider can still place traction on uterus with this device just as with tenaculum.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity Measure 100 point visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Pain recorded by patient during the procedure and one day following via 100 point visual analogue scale.
(0 = none, 100 = worst imaginable)
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedural Satisfaction Patient records level of satisfaction with the procedure (Very Unsatisfied, Unsatisfied, Neutral, Satisfied, Very Satisfied)
Time Frame: < 1 hour
|
Patient records level of satisfaction with the procedure (Very Unsatisfied, Unsatisfied, Neutral, Satisfied, Very Satisfied)
|
< 1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Turok, MD, MPH, University of Utah, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AB001
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.