SpyGlass Direct Visualization System Clinical Registry in China (SpyChina)

July 30, 2018 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

Clinical Registry of Cholangioscopy Using the SpyGlass™ Direct Visualization System Throughout China

To document indications for cholangioscopy and clinical utility of the SpyGlass Direct Visualization System in China when used per standard of practice.

Prospective, Post market, Multi-center, Non-randomized Study

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients who presenting with an indication for cholangioscopy or presenting with a possible indication for cholangioscopy to be determined during the ERCP procedure immediately preceding the SpyGlass procedure will join this study, totally 500 patients across 16 sites throughout China will participate in study. After SpyGlass operation, all patients will be followed for 72 hours to observe adverse events, and patients with indeterminate stricture or undefined filling defect indication with tissue sampling not yielding histopathology positive for malignancy and unresolved device and/or procedure related SAE at 72 Hours will continue to be followed up until 6 months. Finally, procedure success rate will be analyzed as primary endpoint, and SAEs and impact of patients management will be analyzed as secondary endpoint.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
197

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Changhai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All consecutive patients seen at an investigational site during the enrollment period

  • Presenting with an indication for cholangioscopy, or
  • Presenting with a possible indication for cholangioscopy to be determined during the ERCP procedure immediately preceding the SpyGlass procedure.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age above 18 and not above 85.
  2. Willing and able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
  3. Willing and able to comply with the study procedures.
  4. Indicated for ERCP and cholangioscopy or indicated for ERCP with suspected need for cholangioscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Endoscopic techniques are contraindicated.
  2. ERCP is contraindicated
  3. A medical condition that warrants the use of the device outside of the indication for use.
  4. Requirement for anticoagulation that cannot be safely stopped at least 7 days prior to the procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
SpyGlass Direct Visualization System
Any patient who has undergone SpyGlass Choledochoscopy procedures for diagnosis and/or treatment of biliary tract diseases.
Device: SpyGlass
The SpyGlass Direct Visualization System is an integrated product platform that is designed to provide a direct intraluminal view of the biliary duct system and direct therapeutic devices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural success rate
Time Frame: 72 hours
  1. For indeterminate strictures or undefined filling defects cases procedural success is defined as 1) ability to visualize stricture or defect, and 2) ability to provide visual impression of malignancy, and 3) when applicable, ability to obtain SpyBite biopsy adequate for histology
  2. For biliary stone cases procedural success is defined as 1) ability to visualize the stone(s), and 2) ability to successfully initiate stone fragmentation, and 3) ability to achieve stone clearance in one or more SpyGlass procedures.
  3. For other indications procedural success is defined as ability to establish diagnosis and /or complete therapy in the following categories: 1) pre-operative assessment of extent of peri-ampullary and biliary tumors, 2) selective guidewire placement, 3) assessment of unexplained hemobilia, 4) assessment of portal biliopathy, 5) assessment of intraductal biliary ablation therapy, 6) extraction of migrated stents, or 7) other.
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Endpoints
Time Frame: Post Procedure
Evaluation of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the SpyGlass devices and/or the SpyGlass procedure from enrollment through the 72 Hour Post Procedure Follow-up Visit.
Post Procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Scientific Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 28, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 20, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • E7101

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings