Skin Traction Versus Position Splint in Patients With Hip Fracture
The Effects of Preoperative Skin Traction and Position Splint on Pain, Comfort and Satisfaction in Patients With Hip Fracture
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06018
- Gülhane Military Medical Academy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being inpatient who were planned the surgery due to the hip fracture (caput femur fracture, collum femur fracture, femur intertrochanteric fracture and subtrochanteric fracture) diagnosis in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic
- Being 50 years old or more
- Patients who speak and literate in Turkish
- Patients who gave informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any condition that emerges an obstacle for verbal and written interaction during data collection phase
- Unable to perform written or verbal communication in Turkish
- Withdrawal from the study due to medical reasons or death, at his/her will prior to preoperative data collection
- Urgent non-elective surgery
- Physician decision that do accept the method of immobilization assigned to the patient as appropriate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Skin traction
Prior to hip fracture surgery, affected limb was wrapped with a special elastic bandage and pulled from the sole of the foot with a weight of 5-10% of total body weight of the patient (min 2.3 kg, max 4.5 kg).
|
This group is the routine treatment (control) valid in the clinical practice.
|
|
Experimental: Position splint
Prior to hip fracture surgery, position splint was applied to the affected limb in order to keep the extremity in the proper positon without any weight lifting.
|
This group is the actual intervention group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain
Time Frame: up to 7 days
|
Pain was assessed by VAS score prior to intervention, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after intervention and daily from the next morning of intervention till the surgery.
|
up to 7 days
|
|
Comfort
Time Frame: up to 7 days
|
Comfort was assessed by VAS score prior to intervention, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after intervention and by Immobilization Comfort Questionnaire daily from the next morning of intervention till the surgery.
|
up to 7 days
|
|
Satisfaction from the treatment
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
|
Satisfaction from the treatment was assessed by VAS score from the next day after intervention till the surgery.
|
Up to 7 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complications
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
|
Complications (pressure ulcer, deep vein thrombosis, allergic skin reaction, pulmonary and urinary tract infection and constipation due to immobilization) were evaluated daily after intervention till the surgery.
|
Up to 7 days
|
|
Surgery duration
Time Frame: participants were followed for the duration of surgical procedure, an average of 2 hours
|
Time that the surgical procedure has taken was assessed.
|
participants were followed for the duration of surgical procedure, an average of 2 hours
|
|
Hospitalization duration
Time Frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeks
|
Time spent in the hospital till discharge was assessed.
|
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Betul Tosun, RN, PhD, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
- Study Chair: Ozlem Aslan, Assoc.Prof., Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Resch S, Bjarnetoft B, Thorngren KG. Preoperative skin traction or pillow nursing in hip fractures: a prospective, randomized study in 123 patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15;27(18-19):1191-5. doi: 10.1080/09638280500055800.
- Saygi B, Ozkan K, Eceviz E, Tetik C, Sen C. Skin traction and placebo effect in the preoperative pain control of patients with collum and intertrochanteric femur fractures. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010;68(1):15-7.
- Endo J, Yamaguchi S, Saito M, Itabashi T, Kita K, Koizumi W, Kawaguchi Y, Asaka T, Saegusa O. Efficacy of preoperative skin traction for hip fractures: a single-institution prospective randomized controlled trial of skin traction versus no traction. J Orthop Sci. 2013 Mar;18(2):250-5. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0338-1. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
- Rosen JE, Chen FS, Hiebert R, Koval KJ. Efficacy of preoperative skin traction in hip fracture patients: a prospective, randomized study. J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Feb;15(2):81-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200102000-00001.
- Koval KJ, Cooley MR. Clinical pathway after hip fracture. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15;27(18-19):1053-60. doi: 10.1080/09638280500056618.
- Hili S, Dawe EJ, Lindisfarne EA, Stott PM. Perioperative management of elderly patients suffering a hip fracture. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2014 Feb;75(2):78-82. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2014.75.2.78.
- Yip DK, Chan CF, Chiu PK, Wong JW, Kong JK. Why are we still using pre-operative skin traction for hip fractures? Int Orthop. 2002;26(6):361-4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-002-0387-8. Epub 2002 Jul 13.
- Anderson GH, Harper WM, Connolly CD, Badham J, Goodrich N, Gregg PJ. Preoperative skin traction for fractures of the proximal femur. A randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Sep;75(5):794-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376442.
- Handoll HH, Queally JM, Parker MJ. Pre-operative traction for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD000168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000168.pub3.
- Levi N. Is preoperative tibial traction responsible for peroneal nerve palsy in patients with a fractured hip? Acta Orthop Belg. 1998 Sep;64(3):273-6.
- Finsen V, Borset M, Buvik GE, Hauke I. Preoperative traction in patients with hip fractures. Injury. 1992;23(4):242-4. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(05)80007-5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- B.10.4.İSM.4.06.68.49/
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.