Gait and Functional Improvement in Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Use of Verasense for Soft Tissue Balancing
PILOT STUDY: Gait and Functional Improvement in Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Use of Verasense for Soft Tissue Balancing: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
The primary objectives of this study are to understand the effects of soft-tissue balancing on Gait, function and rehabilitation potential after sensor-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty and correlate Intra-operative subjective feel with OrthoSensor Outputs
Secondary objectives are to quantify and observe:
- Pain medication use
- Swelling
- Muscle strength and girth
- Gait efficiency
- Patient satisfaction
- Activity levels, functional return (i.e., back to work, resume normal activities)
- Patient perception of a balanced knee
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Christopher R. Anderson, MS, MBA, CCRP
- Phone Number: (954) 372-2641
- Email: canderson@orthosensor.com
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21215-5271
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore - Rubin Institute of Advanced Orthopedics Center for Joint Preservation and Reconstruction
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject must be a candidate for a primary PCL retaining total knee arthroplasty
- Subject must be diagnosed with one or more of the following conditions: osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, rheumatoid or other inflammatory arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis
- Subject is between the age of 45 - 80 years
- Subject is likely to be available for all study visits
- Subject is able and willing to sign the informed consent and follow study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior total knee arthroplasty, ligament insufficiencies, prior surgeries such as ACL or PCL reconstructions, posterolateral reconstructions, osteotomies, tibia plateau fractures
- Range of Motion less than 90 degrees, flexion contracture of more than 20 degrees
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control - Without the use of Verasense
Total Knee Replacement without the use of intraoperative sensors
|
Patients in this cohort will undergo manual total knee replacement without the use of Verasense
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Sensor-assisted TKR (Verasense)
Total Knee Replacement with the use of intraoperative sensors
|
Verasense is a single use, disposable device embedded with microelectronics into a standard tibial trial to provide dynamic, intraoperative feedback regarding limb alignment, tibiofemoral position and quantitative pressure at peak contact points in the medial and lateral compartments during total knee replacement surgery.
Utilizing sensor-derived data, the surgeon can now evaluate intercompartmental loading throughout the range of motion, and correct for soft-tissue abnormalities while receiving real-time feedback regarding joint balance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Rehabilitation Potential
Time Frame: 6 Months
|
6 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Society Pain and Functional Scoring (KSS)
Time Frame: 6 month
|
The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, range of motion (ROM) and joint stability, and one for functional parameters.
Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points.
Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome.
|
6 month
|
|
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Time Frame: 6 month
|
The FJS is based on the patients' ability to forget about a joint as a result of the treatment.
The FJS assessment is scored on a 0-100 scale.
The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities.
|
6 month
|
|
3D Gait Analysis velocity
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
3D gait analysis relates to the range of motion of a joint and the movement velocity.
The mean gait speed analysis is considered higher than 1 m/s.
|
6 Month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ron Delanois, MD, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 101 (Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.