MR Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Lumbar Back Pain

February 20, 2020 updated by: Pejman Ghanouni, Stanford University

A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Initial Effectiveness of MR Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU) in the Treatment of Facetogenic Lumbar Back Pain

The primary purpose of this protocol is to assess the ExAblate 2100 MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound device as an intervention for treatment of facetogenic lower back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single group, single arm, open/nonblinded, non-randomized study. The primary outcomes are safety and preliminary efficacy. The InSightec ExAblate 2100 MRgHIFU system is a non-invasive thermal ablation device fully integrated with an MR imaging system and used for the ablation of soft tissue and bone.The study will reach primary completion 12 months from the time the study opens to accrual.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women > 21 years of age and who are skeletally mature
  2. Body mass index ≤ 30 kg/m2
  3. Patients who are able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document and able to attend all study visits
  4. Patients with at least 6 months of chronic lower back pain (LBP) localized to the midline or axial low back, with symptoms attributed to the facet joints on physical examination that have persisted despite conservative therapy. Conservative therapy is defined as systemic pain medications and anti-inflammatory medications, as well as physical therapy, such as massage, heating, hydrotherapy, and strengthening exercises.
  5. Patients with Numerical Rating Scale worst lumbar back pain score of at least 4 out of 10 over the 24 hours preceding the time of rating.
  6. Patients must have chronic LBP attributed to facet joints as demonstrated by MRI consistent with at least grade 2 facet joint arthritis, with corresponding abnormal activity at the facet joint on 18F-sodium fluoride PET-CT.
  7. Patients must have an analgesic response to either prior local anesthetic injection to the facet joint or to radiofrequency ablation of the facet joint, with relapse of pain.
  8. The targeted facet joint must be deeper than 10 mm from the skin

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with severe lumbar lordosis
  2. Patients with contraindication for MR imaging such as implanted metallic devices that are not MRI-safe, size limitations, claustrophobia. etc
  3. Patients with known intolerance or allergy to MR contrast agent (gadolinium chelates) including advanced kidney disease (GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or on dialysis
  4. Pregnant and nursing patients will be excluded from the study because of a contraindication to administering MRI contrast agents to these patients
  5. Patients with known intolerance or allergy to medications used for sedation (midazolam), analgesia (fentanyl), and local and regional anesthesia (lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine)
  6. Patients with evidence of lumbosacral radiculopathy on MRI or physical exam findings, including radicular leg pain, or any neurologic deficit at or below the segmental level of the highest facet to be treated, including subjects with impaired sphincter control

  7. Patients with pain at another location that

    1. cannot be distinguished from lumbar back pain
    2. does not rate at least 2 points less in worst pain score compared to lumbar back pain
    3. requires the use of analgesics
  8. Patients with gross spinal instability on imaging
  9. Patients who have lumbar spinal stabilization hardware in place

  10. Target is:

    • NOT visible by non-contrast MRI, OR
    • NOT accessible to ExAblate device
  11. Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (can be up to 5 hrs of total table time)
  12. Patients with acute medical condition (e.g. pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study

  13. Patients with unstable cardiac status including:

    1. Unstable angina pectoris on medication
    2. Patients with documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry
    3. Congestive heart failure requiring medication (other than diuretic)
    4. Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs
  14. Patients with severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
  15. Patients with severe hematologic, neurologic, or other uncontrolled disease (e.g. platelets < 50,000/microL, INR > 1.5)
  16. Patients who are taking anti-thrombotic medication
  17. Severe cerebrovascular disease (multiple CVAs or CVA within 6 months)
  18. Patients with inflammatory arthritides.
  19. Patients unable to communicate with the investigator and staff
  20. Patients seeking compensation for disability or work injury.
  21. Patients who are part of another trial testing other Investigational Agents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ExAblate 2100 Treatment
The ExAblate 2100 system will be used in the MRgHIFU treatment of lower back pain arising from facet joint arthritis.
Device: ExAblate 2100
The InSightec ExAblate 2100 MRgHIFU system is a non-invasive thermal ablation device fully integrated with an MR imaging system and used for the ablation of soft tissue and bone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device Related Complications as a Measure of Safety
Time Frame: 24 months
Safety will be determined by evaluating for the incidence and severity of any device related complication from the treatment day visit through 24 months after treatment.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Relief on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 24 months
Effectiveness will be determined by the level of pain relief, as measured by the NRS, and decrease in analgesic/opiate use.
24 months
Quality of Life Improvement
Time Frame: 24 months
Effectiveness will be determined by improved quality of life, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pejman Ghanouni, MD, PhD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 29163

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Facet Joint Pain

Clinical Trials on ExAblate 2100

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings