Beyond TME Origins

October 16, 2024 updated by: Imperial College London

Investigating the Origins of Pelvic Recurrence in Colorectal Cancer

All patients with recurrent colorectal cancer in the pelvis are eligible. The original primary tumour staging scans and resected surgical specimen needs to be available. Patients' recurrence will be staged using our proposed MRI classification. We will be assessing the original primary staging scans and histopathology to learn about risk factors for recurrence. We will record treatment for the recurrence, and patients will be followed up for three years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A prospective and retrospective cohort study to improve surgical and treatment planning using an imaging assessment proforma of advanced and recurrent colorectal cancers. This involves the implementation of imaging assessment proformas describing anatomic pelvic compartments and aetiology of disease recurrence for treatment planning.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
383

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Had a primary colorectal adenocarcinoma proven by biopsy taken as part of routine clinical practice
  2. Has a confirmed diagnosis of recurrent pelvic colorectal cancer
  3. Has previously completed surgical treatment of primary adenocarcinoma of the colon, sigmoid colon or rectum
  4. Are able to undergo high resolution MRI for staging prior to treatment decisions
  5. Have provided written informed consent to participate in the study
  6. Be aged 16 years or over

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have irresectable extra-pelvic metastatic disease
  2. Original baseline staging and preoperative restaging scans (MR for rectal and sigmoid cancers and/or CT for colon and sigmoid cancers) are unavailable
  3. Original preoperative, surgical and adjuvant treatment has not been documented or is unavailable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Patients with pelvic recurrence from primary colorectal cancer
Implementation of imaging assessment proformas describing anatomic pelvic compartments and aetiology of disease recurrence for treatment planning.
Procedure: New Radiological Staging Classification system for patients with advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer undergoing pelvic exenterative surgery
Currently there are no validated criteria or guidelines for judging whether advanced primary or recurrent colorectal cancer can be successfully removed and for selecting which patients should undergo this form of more radical surgery as is exenterative surgery. We are proposing that by validating the detailed evaluation of imaging of the tumour distribution within the pelvis using a new radiological staging classification, this will enable clear selection criteria to be established and will improve surgical planning.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To change R0 resection rates for locally recurrent rectal cancers with the use of the proposed staging system.
Time Frame: 3 years
An increase of 20% in R0 resection (from 55% to 75%) for locally recurrent rectal cancers with the use of the proposed staging system
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare baseline prognostic features against type of recurrence
Time Frame: 3 and 5 years
Correlation of baseline and post treatment prognostic factors on imaging and pathology against type of recurrence.
3 and 5 years
To compare the MRI type of recurrence against clinical outcomes
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Proportion of patients with survival >12mths according to type of recurrence as described on MRI
1, 3 and 5 years
To compare the MRI compartment(s) distribution of recurrence against clinical outcomes
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Proportion of patients with survival >12mths according to compartment(s) of recurrence as described on MRI
1, 3 and 5 years
To investigate the effect of surgical and non-surgical treatments for recurrence on Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3 and 5 years
Quality of life assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30
1, 2, 3 and 5 years
To compare radiology and histopathology compartments in patients undergoing beyond TME surgery for recurrence
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
The number of compartments predicted as involved on MRI against the number of compartments reported on the corresponding pathology specimens
Up to 2 years
To measure radiology inter-observer agreement for types of recurrence classification
Time Frame: 5 years
Kappa agreement between paired radiologists for type of recurrence
5 years
To investigate health economic costs of patients with pelvic recurrence against type
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Healthcare costs using NHS Reference Costs combined with health resource utilization and QoL data
Up to 3 years
To map original radiotherapy volumes (including integrated boosts) against types of recurrence
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Correlation of dose, type and distribution of radiotherapy against anatomic sites and aetiology of recurrence as seen on MRI
Up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Imperial College London

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pelican Cancer Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gina Dr Brown, MD, Imperial College London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 25, 2014

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DOCUMAS: 17HH4158

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings