Rapid Sequence Intubation at the Emergency Department
The C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Compared With Conventional Laryngoscopy for Rapid Sequence Intubation at the Emergency Department
All patients undergoing emergent endotracheal intubation (RSI) at the Emergency Department will be screened for inclusion in this clinical study. The indication of endotracheal intubation is an exclusively clinical decision and is not affected by this study protocol in any aspect.
If fulfilling the In- and exclusion criteria's, patient will be randomly assigned to one of two groups
- C-MAC Videolaryngoscope in appropriate size
- conventional endotracheal intubation using Macintosh Blade in appropriate size
Randomization (1:1) will be based on computer-generated codes maintained in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes that will be opened immediately before randomization.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zuerich, Switzerland, 8091
- University Hospital Zuerich, Dept of Anesthesiology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients requiring emergency Rapid Sequence Intubation at the emergency department
- Male and Female subjects 18 years to 99 years of age
- Written confirmation by a physician not involved in this study
- Written informed consent by the participant (obtained afterwards)
- Patient not showing remarkable rejection in participation in this study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Maxilla-Facial trauma
- Immobilized cervical spine
- Indication for fiberoptic guided intubation (known difficult airway)
- Ongoing Cardio-Pulmonary-Resuscitation (CPR)
- Involvement in any other clinical trial during the course of this trial, within a period of 30 days prior to its beginning or 30 days after its completion
- Severe or immediately life-treating injury requiring immediate medical treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: conventional endotracheal intubation
Patients assigned to this group will be intubated using conventional Macintosh blade in adequate size.
|
conventional endotracheal intubation
|
|
Active Comparator: C-MAC
Patients assigned to this group will be intubated using C-MAC videolaryngoscope in adequate size.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success Rate
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
defined as successful placement of endotracheal tube within the trachea and
|
10 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
time to intubation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
defined as time between insertion of the videolaryngoscope/ Macintosh blade into the mouth until detection of end-tidal CO2
|
10 minutes
|
|
Laryngoscopic view
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Cormack and Lehane Score
|
10 minutes
|
|
Number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
10 minutes
|
|
|
Unrecognized esophageal intubation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
10 minutes
|
|
|
Ease of intubation (1-5)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
o (1) very easy, (2) easy, (3) somewhat difficult, (4) difficult, (5) impossible
|
10 minutes
|
|
Violations of the teeth
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
number of patients; teeth will be inspected for potential damage and documented accordingly
|
10 minutes
|
|
Necessity of using further, alternative airway devices for successful intubation (if randomized airway device failed)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
number of patients, requiring alternate device
|
10 minutes
|
|
Maximum drop of saturation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Spo2 will be measured continuously and documented accordingly
|
10 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sulser S, Ubmann D, Brueesch M, Goliasch G, Seifert B, Spahn DR, Ruetzler K. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with conventional laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation at the emergency department: study protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Apr 24;23:38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0119-x.
- Sulser S, Ubmann D, Schlaepfer M, Brueesch M, Goliasch G, Seifert B, Spahn DR, Ruetzler K. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;33(12):943-948. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000525.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KEK Zurich 2014-0356
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.