Comparative Study to Evaluate the Cosmetic Appearance of Two Brands (Coopervision (CVI) vs. Competitor) of Color Soft Contact Lenses.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mexico D.F., Mexico
- Optometry Clinic, National Autonomous University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive).
- Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years.
- Is an adapted wearer of spherical soft contact lenses.
- Has a contact lens spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 10.00 (inclusive).
- Has a spectacle cylinder up to 0.75 diopter (D) in each eye
- Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye.
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease.
- Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter.
- Is willing to wear his/hers spectacles over the study contact lenses.
- Is willing to comply with the wear schedule.
- Is willing to comply with the visit schedule.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has never worn contact lenses before.
- Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
- Has a history of not achieving comfortable contact lens wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
- Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -10.00D.
- Has a spectacle cylinder ≥1.00D of cylinder in either eye.
- Does not have a pair of corrective spectacles at the time of the visit.
- Cannot achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye.
- Presence of clinically significant (grade > 2.0, scale 0-4) anterior segment abnormalities.
- Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.
Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
- Pathological dry eye or associated findings
- Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
- Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
- Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
- Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
- Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
- History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
- Poor personal hygiene
- Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
- Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
- Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
- Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Group 1 - Verde (Competitor-control) vs. Green (CVI-test)
Each subject was randomized to wear the test and control lenses contralaterally.
|
contact lens
Other Names:
contact lens
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Group 2 - Cinza (Competitor-control) vs. Grey (CVI-test)
Each subject was randomized to wear the test and control lenses contralaterally.
|
contact lens
Other Names:
contact lens
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Group 3 - Esmeralda (Competitor-control) vs. Jade (CVI-test)
Each subject was randomized to wear the test and control lenses contralaterally.
|
contact lens
Other Names:
contact lens
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Group 4 - Azul (Competitor-control) vs. Blue (CVI-test)
Each subject was randomized to wear the test and control lenses contralaterally.
|
contact lens
Other Names:
contact lens
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cosmetic Appearance Preference
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
Participant's subjective preference for cosmetic appearance.
3 point Likert Scale.
1=prefer CVI-test lens 2=prefer Competitor-control lens, 3=no preference
|
20 minutes
|
|
Comfort
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant's subjective rating for comfort.
(Scale 0-10, 0=poor, 10=excellent).
|
Baseline
|
|
Comfort
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
Participant's subjective rating for comfort.
(Scale 0-10, 0=poor, 10=excellent).
|
20 minutes
|
|
Comfort Preference
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant's subjective preference for comfort on a 3 point Likert Scale.
1=prefer CVI-test lens, 2=prefer Competitor-control lens, 3=no preference
|
Baseline
|
|
Comfort Preference
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
Participant's subjective preference for comfort on a 3 point Likert Scale.
1=prefer CVI-test lens, 2=prefer Competitor-control lens, 3=no preference
|
20 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ruben Velazquez Guerrero, MSc FIACLE, School of Optometry, National Autonomous University (UNAM), Mexico
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- EX-MKTG-51
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.