Frontal Cognitive Control Functions Before and After Percutaneous Catheter Procedures in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

April 9, 2024 updated by: Kati Järvelä, Tampere University Hospital

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrythmia. It is an independent risk factor for stroke. There for anticoagulation therapy is used for atrial fibrillation patients. Alternatively, left atrial appendix closure can be used, if the risk for bleeding complications is deemed greater than the possible antithrombotic benefit of anticoagulation medication. Up to 70% of ischemic complications can be prevented with anticoagulation therapy, and left atrial appendix closure seems to have comparable results. Also left atrial catherter ablation (LACA) is gaining popularity as a therapeutic intervention for atrial fibrillation.

However, the procedure is associated with 0,5-1% perioperative risk of clinically evident transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke. While the incidence of clinically evident ischemic complications remain relatively low, recent data suggest that 13%-20% of patients undergoing LACA are affected by post-operative neurocognitive dysfunction (POCD) 90 days after ablation.

The goal of the study is to improve detection of subtle brain dysfunction after cardiac interventions by employing an experimental executive reaction time (RT) test along with EEG recording in aims to improve objective detection of subtle brain dysfunction assumed to underlie persistent cognitive, somatic, and affective complaints reported by patients who have undergone atrial fibrillation ablation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Finland
      • Tampere, Finland, 33521
        • Tampere University Heart Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 80 patients will be drafted for the study. The subjects will be recruited from Tampere University Hospital Heart Hospital Co. Total of fifty patients, men and women between 50-70 years, undergoing left atrial catheter ablation (LACA) (30 patients) or percutaneous left atrial appendix closure procedure (20 patients) because of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, will be recruited for the study.

A control group of 15 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 15 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who are treated with antiarrhythmic and anticoagulation therapies suggested by current guidelines will be tested with the same testing schema and time points. Control group will be drafted from the cardiologic patients of the Heart Hospital and also from Hatanpää Hospital cardiologic outpatient clinic.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 50-70
  • undergoing left atrial catheter ablation or percutaneous left atrial appendix closure procedure
  • In the ablation group, patients will qualify for the study if they have symptomatic atrial fibrillation (EHRA classification 2-4) and if their risk of thromboembolic complications with CHA2DS2VASc scale is low (0-2 points).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 or over 70 years.
  • Contraindication for anticoagulation therapy (in ablation group),
  • Previous neurological or psychiatric disorder.
  • Significant visual problem that can't be corrected for,
  • problems with upper arm/hand use, that would make the execution of the test difficult.
  • normal contraindications for the ablation and appendix closure procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
left atrial catheter ablation
left atrial appendix closure
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation control group
persistent atrial fibrillation control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in response speeds (ms) and response error rate (%) in the executive RT-test
Time Frame: 1 day before procedure, 3 months and 1 year after post-procedure
1 day before procedure, 3 months and 1 year after post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in amplitude of N2/P3 complex in the EEG recording
Time Frame: 1 day before procedure, 3 months and 1 year after post-procedure
1 day before procedure, 3 months and 1 year after post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tampere University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Kaisa Hartikainen, MD, Docent, Behavioral Neurology Research Unit
  • Study Director: Kati Järvelä, MD, PhD, Tampere University Heart Hospital
  • Study Director: Arvi Yli-Hankala, MD, Professor, Tampere University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Jonne Liimatainen, MD, Tampere University Hospital
  • Study Director: Pekka Raatikainen, MD, Docent, Tampere University Heart Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Jaakko Inkovaara, MD, Tampere University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 9, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R14068

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings