Observation Study an Immunogenicity Modified TRC-ID Regimen With CPRV With or Without Rabies Immunoglobulin in Children

January 15, 2015 updated by: Piyada Angsuwatcharakon, Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute

Observation an Immunogenicity and Safety Study of Modified TRC-ID Regimen With A New Chromatographically Purified Vero Cell Rabies Vaccine (SPEEDA®) With or Without Rabies Immunoglobulin in Children

To determine Immunogenicity and Safety Study of Modified TRC-ID Regimen with A New Chromatographically Purified Vero Cell Rabies Vaccine (SPEEDA®) as post exposure rabies intradermal regimen with or without Rabies Immunoglobulin in Children

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

post exposure rabies vaccination with modified Thai red cross intrademal regimen has been proven to be immunogenic and effection when using purified vero cell vaccine (PVRV) In present, new chromatographically purified vero cell rabies vaccine (SPEEDA), chromatography purifed vero cell derived rabies vaccine, is manufactured by the Liaoning Chengda Biotechnology is available This study has a goal to determine the immunogenicity of speeda when using with post exposure rabies intradermal vaccination with or without rabies immune globulin in children

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

recruit the patients from Rabies clinic of Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Thammasat Hospital, Charoen Krung Pracha Rak Hospital and HRM Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center and all had experienced WHO category II or III exposure to suspected rabid animal. In patients with WHO category III have to receive a heterologous biological (ERIG or HRIG)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • they are 1-15 years healthy children
  • give signed informed consent from their parents
  • willing to participate in this study and be able to receive the vaccination and collect blood sample as the study plan.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • they have prior history of rabies vaccination or any equine/human serum administration such as snake antivenom and tetanus antiserum or vaccine allergy
  • Persons who have immunosuppressive conditions such as known HIV infection, transplantation, chronic renal failure, receiving of steroid or immunosuppressive drugs
  • person received anti-malarial drugs within the previous two months or any blood products within previous three months were excluded
  • Urine pregnancy test must be done in all female adolescents to exclude the pregnancy in first visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
WHO category 2
Children patient who have experienced WHO category II exposure will receive rabies vaccine (SPEEDA) 0.1 ml intradermal two site for 4 times
Biological: rabies vaccine
rabies vaccine 0.1 ml intradermal two site for 4 times
WHO category 3
Children patient who have experienced WHO category II exposure will receive rabies vaccine (SPEEDA) 0.1 ml intradermal two site for 4 times with ERIG
Biological: rabies vaccine
rabies vaccine 0.1 ml intradermal two site for 4 times

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
determine the level of rabies neutralizing antibodies after using SPEEDA® with modified TRC-ID rabies with or without RIG and the safety of using SPEEDA® with modified TRC-ID rabies with or without RIG in children
Time Frame: 1 year 6 month
1 year 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Piyada Angsuwatcharakon, MD, QSMI TRC society

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 16, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 15, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RC5704

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings