The Impact of the Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay on Treatment Decisions in a Canadian Population

October 21, 2020 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

The Impact of the Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay on Treatment Decisions in a Canadian Population of Patients With Estrogen Receptor- Positive Early Breast Cancer With 1-3 Positive Lymph Nodes

The main goal of this study is to characterize whether the results of the Oncotype DX® assay affect the physician's treatment recommendations for the adjuvant treatment of women with ER-positive (ER+), early breast cancer (EBC) with 1-3 positive lymph nodes who are potential candidates for chemotherapy, but for whom the benefits of chemotherapy may be uncertain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The Oncotype DX assay has been commercially available in the U.S. since 2004 as a tool to aid a physician's treatment recommendation for a breast cancer patient. While the Oncotype DX assay is currently reimbursed by the Ontario Health Ministry for node-negative EBC, it is not reimbursed for node-positive (N+) patients although the assay has been shown to be both prognostic and predictive of chemotherapy benefit for patients with N+ disease.

The goal of this study is to characterize how the results of the Oncotype DX® assay impact the decision making processes of physicians and patients in a large academic medical center in Ontario by evaluating recommendations for adjuvant therapy within a population of ER+, N+ EBC patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes for whom the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is not certain.

Upon consent, the patient will be assigned an ID number. The physician will discuss the patient's treatment alternatives prior to ordering the Oncotype DX assay. After discussion with the patient, the physician will complete a baseline questionnaire indicating the therapeutic strategy he/she would recommend to the patient based upon the available clinical and pathologic data. In addition, the patient will also complete a baseline questionnaire indicating her treatment preference, based on the previous discussion with the physician.

The Oncotype DX assay will be ordered after receipt of the Registration and Confirmation of Eligibility Form and assignment of patient study number. Once the results of the Oncotype DX assay are available, the physician will discuss the results with the patient. Both the physician and the patient will complete separate follow-up post-assay questionnaires after the results of the Oncotype DX assay are known and shared with the patient.

One last form completed by a study manager or coordinator after a treatment plan has been initiated will register the actual treatment administered to the patient.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer with adequate evaluation of lymph node status with a sentinel lymph node procedure or full axillary dissection, with positive involvement of 1-3 axillary lymph nodes as confirmed by histologic examination.
  • ECOG performance status 0 or 1
  • Patient must be a candidate for treatment of their cancer with systemic chemotherapy in addition to hormonal therapy
  • Eligible Staging Criteria: T1-3 N1 M0
  • Breast tumor must undergo central pathology review at GHI and must be found adequate for the Oncotype DX assay.
  • Breast tumor must be estrogen-receptor positive and HER2 positive (IHC/FISH) as per institutional guidelines

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a prior history of breast cancer in the same breast
  • Patient as been newly diagnosed with more than one operable primary breast tumor
  • Patient has multi-centric tumors (note: patients with multi-focal tumors may be included)
  • Patient has known metastatic breast cancer
  • Patient has <2mm invasive tumor as assessed by local pathologist
  • Patient has received any kind of neoadjuvant treatment
  • Presence of clinical factors rendering the patient a non-viable candidate for adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Presence of a current medical condition that would interfere with patient's ability to consent and participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Early stage breast cancer

Women with node positive (1-3 nodes), ER positive breast cancer who are receiving (or will receive) endocrine therapy, and who are candidates for chemotherapy.

Study subjects will have ONCOTYPE Dx assay performed on their breast tumors, and will complete study questionnaires.
Other: Questionnaires, Oncotype Dx Assay
  1. Physician pre-assay questionnaire
  2. Patient pre-assay questionnaire
  3. Oncotype DX® Assay
  4. Physician post- assay questionnaire
  5. Patient post-assay questionnaire
Other Names:
  • Oncotype Dx Assay, Questionnaires

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in physicians' treatment recommendations
Time Frame: 2-4 weeks
2-4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient's treatment preference and level of confidence in treatment plan
Time Frame: 2-4 weeks
2-4 weeks
Change in physicians' level of confidence in the treatment recommendation
Time Frame: 2-4 weeks
2-4 weeks
Specific chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy regimen received by patient
Time Frame: 4-8 weeks
Assessment of actual adjuvant treatment given to patient after Oncotype DX results available
4-8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Genomic Health®, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Eisen, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 231-2014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings