A Phase 2a, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ustekinumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

March 11, 2020 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study of Ustekinumab in Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab as measured by a reduction in disease activity for subjects with active Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE - chronic disorder of connective tissue in which there can be skin rash, arthritis, kidney problems, and anemia, among other problems).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A multicenter (more than one medical research center involved in study), randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the Investigator nor the participant know about the study drug), placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study of ustekinumab in participants with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Participants will be screened to achieve all inclusion criteria and none exclusion criteria and will then receive either ustekinumab or placebo along with concomitant background medicine. Participants will be primarily assessed for response using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Response Index 2000 (SRI-4). Participants' safety will be assessed throughout the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Argentina
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
      • Ciudad De San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
      • San Juan, Argentina
  • Australia
      • Adelaide, Australia
      • Camberwell, Australia
      • Heidelberg, Australia
      • Liverpool, Australia
      • Nedlands, Australia
  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Frankfurt, Germany
      • Koeln, Germany
  • Hungary
      • Budapest, Hungary
      • Debrecen, Hungary
      • Szeged, Hungary
      • Zalaegerszeg, Hungary
  • Mexico
      • Chihuahua, Mexico
      • Guadalajara, Mexico
      • Leon, Mexico
      • Mexico, Mexico
  • Poland
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland
      • Poznan, Poland
      • Szczecin, Poland
      • Wroclaw, Poland
  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Madrid, Spain
      • Málaga, Spain
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain
      • Sevilla, Spain
  • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan
      • Taichung, Taiwan
      • Taichung City, Taiwan
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
    • Michigan
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States
      • New York, New York, United States
      • Syracuse, New York, United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have documented medical history to meet SLICC classification criteria for SLE for a minimum of 3 months prior to first dose
  • At least 1 well-documented (subject file, referring physician letter, or laboratory result), unequivocally positive, documented test for autoantibodies in medical history including either of the following: ANA, and/or anti-dsDNA antibodies, and/or anti-Smith antibodies
  • At least 1 unequivocally positive autoantibody test including ANA and/or anti-dsDNA antibodies and/or anti-Smith antibodies detected during screening
  • At least 1 BILAG A and/or 2 BILAG B domain scores observed during screening prior to first administration of study agent
  • Demonstrate active disease based on SLEDAI-2K score greater than or equal to (>=) 6 observed during screening and assessed approximately 2 to 6 weeks prior to randomization. Must also have SLEDAI-2K score >= 4 for clinical features (ie, SLEDAI excluding laboratory results) at Week 0 prior to the first administration of study agent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of efficacy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), RA/lupus overlap, psoriasis or active Lyme disease
  • Are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy or fathering a child while enrolled in the study or within 4 months after receiving the last administration of study agent
  • Have received systemic or topical cream/ointment preparations of cyclosporine A or other systemic immunomodulatory agents other than those described in inclusion criteria within the past 3 months prior to first administration of study agent
  • Have received a single B cell targeting agent within 3 months prior to first study agent administration; or received more than 1 previous B cell targeting therapy including belimumab or epratuzamab within 6 months prior to first administration of the study agent; or received B cell depleting therapy (eg, rituximab) within 12 months prior to first administration of the study agent or have evidence of continued B-cell depletion following such therapy
  • Have ever received ustekinumab
  • Participant has a history of malignancy within 5 years before screening (exceptions are squamous and basal cell carcinomas of the skin that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 months before the first study agent administration and carcinoma in situ of the cervix that has been surgically cured)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ustekinumab plus Concomitant Medication
Participants will receive weight-range based dosing of approximately 6 mg/kg of ustekinumab intravenously at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w) up to Week 40. Participants who meet the study extension inclusion criteria will continue to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w starting at Week 48 or 56 through Week 104. Participants will continue stable concomitant treatment through Week 48, as well as through the study extension although tapering of corticosteroids is encouraged beyond Week 48. Participants who complete or discontinue study treatment will be evaluated for 16 additional Weeks of safety follow-up.
Drug: Ustekinumab IV
Weight-range based dosing of approximately 6 mg/kg of ustekinumab intravenously at Week 0.
Other Names:
  • STELARA
Drug: Ustekinumab SC
Ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and up to Week 104 in study extension (for eligible participants)
Other: Concomitant Medication
Concomitant treatment (mycophenolate, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine and/or chloroquine, oral corticosteroids, NSAIDs, antihypertensive medications, and topical medications) through Week 48, as well as through the study extension although tapering of corticosteroids is encouraged beyond Week 48.
Experimental: Placebo followed by Ustekinumab plus Concomitant Medication
Participants will receive placebo intravenously at Week 0 followed by placebo subcutaneously at Weeks 8 and 16. At week 24 participants will receive ustekinumab SC q8w up to Week 40. Participants who meet the study extension inclusion criteria will continue to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w starting at Week 48 or 56 through Week 104. Participants will continue stable concomitant treatment through Week 48, as well as through the study extension although tapering of corticosteroids is encouraged beyond Week 48. Participants who complete or discontinue study treatment will be evaluated for 16 additional Weeks of safety follow-up.
Drug: Ustekinumab SC
Ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and up to Week 104 in study extension (for eligible participants)
Other: Concomitant Medication
Concomitant treatment (mycophenolate, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine and/or chloroquine, oral corticosteroids, NSAIDs, antihypertensive medications, and topical medications) through Week 48, as well as through the study extension although tapering of corticosteroids is encouraged beyond Week 48.
Drug: Placebo Infusion
Placebo intravenously at Week 0.
Drug: Placebo SC
Placebo subcutaneously at Weeks 8 and 16.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI-4) Composite Response (CR) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA). Composite response is defined as SRI-4 response in participants who do not meet treatment failure criteria. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 to 105, with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from very well (0)-very poor (10).
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2K) Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The SLEDAI-2K is an established, validated SLE activity index. It is based on the presence of 24 features in 9 organ systems and measures disease activity in SLE patients in the previous 30 days. It is weighted according to the feature. Features are scored by the assessing physician if present within the last 30 days with more severe features having higher scores, and then simply added to determine the total SLEDAI 2K score, which ranges from 0 to 105, with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
PGA was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0.0 to 10.0 centimeter [cm]). The scale for the physician's assessment ranges for 'no lupus activity' (0.0) to 'extremely active lupus' (10.0).
Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants With BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
BICLA response defined as participants meeting following criteria: 1. BILAG improvement (all BILAG A scores at baseline improved to either B, C or D and all BILAG B scores at baseline improved to C or D and no worsening in disease activity defined as no new BILAG A scores and <= 1 new BILAG B score) and 2. no worsening of total SLEDAI-2K from baseline 3. < 1 cm increase in PGA and 4. no treatment failure criteria met. BILAG: assesses disease extent, severity (range: A [severe] to E [no disease]). SLEDAI-2K: assesses improvement in disease activity (range: 0 to 105; higher score = higher severity). PGA: assesses worsening in participant's general health status (0.0= 'no lupus activity' to 10.0 = 'extremely active lupus').
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Number of Joints With Pain and Signs of Inflammation at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change from baseline in number of joints (active joint) with pain and signs of inflammation (tenderness, swelling or effusion) for participants with at least 2 affected joints at baseline were reported. An active joint is defined as a joint with pain and signs of inflammation (e.g., tenderness, swelling or effusion).
Baseline, Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 13, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR106661
  • CNTO1275SLE2001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
  • 2014-005000-19 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings