Patient and Physician's Satisfaction After a Long Term Treatment of Glabellar Lines With Dysport® (APPEAL)

November 4, 2020 updated by: Ipsen

An Assessment of Patient and Physician's Satisfaction After a Long Term Treatment of Glabellar Lines With Dysport®.

This study aims to look at patient and physician satisfaction of long term Glabellar lines (GL) treatment with Dysport in a real life setting. It will also allow better understanding of what patients expect from the treatment, and the injection practices used by doctors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Malvern, Australia, 3144
        • ERASE
      • Sydney, Australia, 2217
        • SouthDerm
  • Brazil
      • Botucatu, Brazil, 18603-390
        • Clinica Laura Bariquelo Buratini
  • Czechia
      • Brno, Czechia, 60200
        • Estetická Dermatologie
      • Praha, Czechia, 14000
        • BcD Clinic s.r.o.
  • Kazakhstan
      • Almaty, Kazakhstan, 050022
        • Laser Center DARUS
  • Lebanon
      • Beirut, Lebanon, 70920
        • Dr Haddad Clinics
  • Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
        • Centre of Aesthetic Medicine "Chistie prudi"
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117630
        • Preventive Medicine Clinic "Vallex M"
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119002
        • Plastic Surgery Institute
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630071
        • FI IF & TC & apos; Eye microsurgery & apos
      • St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197110
        • Clinic of Aesthetic Medicine
  • Turkey
      • Kocaeli, Turkey, 41380
        • Kocaeli University School of Medecine Umuttepe
  • Ukraine
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 03087
        • Clinic of Aesthetic medicine "Ankor"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Private practices and clinics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient with moderate to severe GL naïve of any type of aesthetic treatment/procedure (invasive and non-invasive) for GL who provided written informed consent to take part.
  • Patient who has prior to and independent of the study decided to undergo long term treatment of GL only (at least three cycles).
  • Patient able to comply with the protocol (completion of web questionnaires).
  • Patient whom physician intended to treat with Dysport independent of participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient already included in this study.
  • Participation in an interventional trial within 30 days prior to study entry.
  • Patient who is at risk in terms of precautions, warnings, and contraindication (follow local Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of Dysport).
  • Female patient who is pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy during the study.
  • Hypersensitivity to Dysport® or to its excipients.
  • Presence of infection at the proposed injection sites.
  • Presence of myasthenia gravis, Eaton Lambert syndrome or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess patient satisfaction regarding GL after three injection cycles of Dysport.
Time Frame: Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 3
Assessed by patient auto questionnaire completion
Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To describe patient individual expectations.
Time Frame: Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
Assessed by patient auto questionnaire completion
Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
To assess patient satisfaction after one and two injection cycles of Dysport.
Time Frame: Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
Assessed by patient auto questionnaire completion
Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
To describe factors associated with patient satisfaction such as attractiveness, self-esteem, self-perceived age, desire to receive another injection.
Time Frame: Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
Assessed by patient auto questionnaire completion
Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
To assess the GL severity (at rest and maximum frown) as per usual practice.
Time Frame: Baseline (visit 1) and visit 3
Physician assessment using GL severity scale
Baseline (visit 1) and visit 3
To assess physician satisfaction after one and three injection cycles of Dysport.
Time Frame: Visit 1 follow up visit and visit 3 follow up visit (if performed)
5 point Likert scale
Visit 1 follow up visit and visit 3 follow up visit (if performed)
To describe Dysport injection practices: muscles injected, total injected units, total volume injected, number of injection points and interval between injections.
Time Frame: From visit 1 until the end of the study
From visit 1 until the end of the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ipsen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Y-79-52120-201

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings