A Comparison of 122-0551 Foam Versus Vehicle Foam in Subjects With Plaque Psoriasis

October 11, 2018 updated by: Therapeutics, Inc.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Comparison of 122-0551 Foam Versus Vehicle Foam in Subjects With Plaque Psoriasis

This Phase 3 study has been designed to determine and compare the efficacy and safety of 122-0551 Foam and Vehicle Foam applied twice daily for two weeks in subjects with plaque psoriasis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
144

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
        • Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center, PC
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92122
        • UCSD Dermatology
    • Florida
      • Ormond Beach, Florida, United States, 32174
        • Leavitt Medical Associates of Florida d/b/a Ameriderm Research
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
        • Shideler Clinical Research Center
      • Plainfield, Indiana, United States, 46168
        • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center, PC
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Health System
    • Missouri
      • Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States, 64506
        • MediSearch Clinical Trials
    • North Carolina
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
        • Dermatology Consulting Services
    • Texas
      • Arlington, Texas, United States, 76011
        • Arlington Research Center, inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a clinical diagnosis of stable plaque psoriasis involving a minimum of 2% and no more than 12% affected body surface area.
  • Subject has an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of at least three (moderate) at study start.
  • If subject is a woman of childbearing potential, she must have a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use an effective form of birth control for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating plaque psoriasis.
  • Subject has guttate, pustular, erythrodermic or other non-plaque forms of psoriasis.
  • Subject has a physical condition which, in the investigator's opinion, might impair evaluation of plaque psoriasis, or which exposes the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation.
  • Subject has used any phototherapy (including laser), photo-chemotherapy or other forms of photo based therapy for the treatment of their psoriasis within 30 days prior to study start.
  • Subject has used any systemic methotrexate, retinoids, systemic corticosteroids [including intralesional, intra-articular, and intramuscular corticosteroids], cyclosporine or analogous products within 90 days prior to study start.
  • Subject has used any systemic biologic therapy (i.e., FDA-approved or experimental therapy) within five half-lives of the biologic prior to study start.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Active Arm
122-0551 Foam, topically applied twice daily for two weeks
Drug: 122-0551 Foam
122-0551 Foam applied twice daily to treat psoriasis
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle Arm
Vehicle Foam, topically applied twice daily for two weeks
Drug: Vehicle Foam
Vehicle Foam applied twice daily to treat psoriasis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Rated a "Treatment Success" Based on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Time Frame: Day 15
The IGA score is a static evaluation of the overall or "average" degree of severity of a subject's disease, taking into account all of the subject's psoriatic lesions. "Treatment success" is defined as a score of 0 or 1 representing "cleared" or "almost cleared" at Day 15 with at least a two grade decrease in severity score relative to Baseline. IGA is measured on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Rated a "Treatment Success" for Each of the Clinical Signs of Psoriasis (Scaling, Erythema and Plaque Elevation)
Time Frame: Day 15
A static assessment of the overall or "average" degree of severity of each of three key characteristics present within all of the subject's psoriatic lesions. "Treatment success" is defined as a score of 0 or 1 representing "cleared" or "almost cleared" at Day 15 with at least a two grade decrease in severity score relative to Baseline. Each clinical sign of psoriasis is measured on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe/very severe).
Day 15

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects With IGA "Treatment Success"
Time Frame: Day 8
"Treatment success" and IGA as defined in the primary outcome measure.
Day 8
Proportion of Subjects Rated a "Treatment Success" for Each of the Clinical Signs of Psoriasis (Scaling, Erythema and Plaque Elevation)
Time Frame: Day 8
"Treatment success" and clinical signs as defined in the secondary outcome measure.
Day 8
Change From Baseline in Pruritus Score
Time Frame: Day 15
Pruritus scale will be used to assess the subjective and multidimensional experience of the subject's pruritus (itching) during the previous two weeks at Baseline and Day 15. Possible scores range from 5 (no pruritus) to 25 (most severe pruritus).
Day 15
Change in % Body Surface Area (BSA) With Active Psoriasis
Time Frame: Day 8 and Day 15
The investigator will use the assumption that 1% BSA is approximately equal to the surface area of the subject's palm and fingers, with the fingers extended yet grouped together, creating a flat oval-like surface area.
Day 8 and Day 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Therapeutics, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Anthony Andrasfay, Therapeutics, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 11, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 122-0551-305

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings