Adherence Monitoring System in Managing Myelosuppression in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Malignant Gliomas Receiving Temozolomide and Radiation Therapy

June 29, 2018 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Comparative Development of Data Driven Systems for Insuring Timely Monitoring for Brain Tumor Patients for Management of Myelosuppression

This research trial studies an adherence monitoring system in managing myelosuppression in patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas who are receiving temozolomide and radiation therapy. The development of an adherence monitoring system may help doctors more effectively utilize electronic medical records to manage myelosuppression during standard treatment with temozolomide and radiation therapy in patients with malignant gliomas.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To develop an adherence monitoring system within Epic that is functionally equivalent to the previously designed and validated system in the Cancer Center Oncology Research Information System (ORIS) for patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas receiving concurrent temozolomide and radiation therapy.

II. To test the newly designed Epic system by comparing the frequency and timing of flags (laboratory date flags, visit date flags and in-patient status flags) and non-adherent days generated with the frequency and timing of those generated by ORIS for patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas receiving concurrent temozolomide and radiation therapy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To develop both systems so that they may be easily adapted in the future to other therapies that require compliance monitoring.

OUTLINE:

Patient lab and visit dates are monitored by the Cancer Center ORIS and EPIC based systems during the 42 days of the concurrent temozolomide and radiation therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who receive concurrent temozolomide and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed malignant gliomas

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients who receive concurrent temozolomide and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed malignant gliomas during and after the construction of the system until the end of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients participating in clinical trials or other deviations from standard therapies that engender similar monitoring risk will be evaluated for this study on a case by case basis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Observational (medical chart review)
Patient lab and visit dates are monitored by the Cancer Center ORIS and EPIC based systems during the 42 days of the concurrent temozolomide and radiation therapy.
Other: Medical Chart Review
Medical chart review by the Cancer Center ORIS and EPIC based systems
Other Names:
  • Chart Review

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of a new adherence monitoring system within Epic that is functionally equivalent to the previously designed and validated system in the Cancer Center ORIS
Time Frame: 42 days
To compare the two systems, the McNemar's tests of paired proportions will be used to compare the output of the established software system to the new system built into the EMR reporting structure.
42 days
Frequency and timing of flags (laboratory date flags, visit date flags and in-patient status flags) generated with the new system
Time Frame: 42 days
To compare the two systems, the McNemar's tests of paired proportions will be used. For each day, whether or not any flag (laboratory date flags, visit date flags and in-patient status flags) was generated or whether a gap occurred will be characterized. By day, the two systems will be compared to determine if they agree for flags and gap days (separately). Alternative methods will be used (such as conditional logistic regression with a random subject effect) if correlation between days is observed.
42 days
Non-adherent days generated with the new system
Time Frame: 42 Days
To compare the two systems, the McNemar's tests of paired proportions will be used. For each day, whether or not any flag (laboratory date flags, visit date flags and in-patient status flags) was generated or whether a gap occurred will be characterized. By day, the two systems will be compared to determine if they agree for flags and gap days (separately). Alternative methods will be used (such as conditional logistic regression with a random subject effect) if correlation between days is observed.
42 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Expansion of both systems to other therapies that require compliance monitoring
Time Frame: 42 days
The feasibility of expanding the systems scope to other disease/treatment scenarios that require compliance monitoring.
42 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00013273
  • P30CA012197 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2015-00113 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • CCCWFU 99115
  • CCCWFU # 99115 (Other Identifier: Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings