Class II Correction Study Using the Invisalign System
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Dr. Sam Daher
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Dr. Sandra Tai
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85260
- Dr. Gary Brigham
-
-
California
-
Rocklin, California, United States, 95765
- Dr. Donna Galante
-
Roseville, California, United States, 95661
- Dr. Mark Holt
-
Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93105
- Dr. Ray Kubisch and Dr. Drew Ferris
-
-
Maryland
-
Ellicott City, Maryland, United States, 21042
- Dr. Sandra Selnick
-
-
Minnesota
-
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota, United States, 55076
- Dr. Regina Blevins
-
Maple Grove, Minnesota, United States, 55369
- Dr. William Kottemann
-
-
New York
-
Cortlandt Manor, New York, United States, 10567
- Dr. Barry Glaser
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject must have fully erupted dentition excluding 2nd and 3rd molars
- Age range 11-19 years old
- Subject that requires bilateral Class II correction and must require at least 3mm of correction as measured by first molar relationship
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject who has unerupted, erupting, partially erupted dentition (except for 2nd and 3rd molars)
- Subject who has spaces between adjacent teeth larger than 3mm
- Subject with active caries
- Subject with periodontal disease
- Subject does not have at least 1st molar fully captured in PVS (polyvinyl siloxane material ) impression or intraoral scan.
- Subject with TMD (Temporomandibular joint dysfunction) symptoms
- Subject has undergone pre-treatment with any orthodontic appliance (any previous treatment prior to study)
- Subject has known allergy to latex and plastic
- Subjects who are pregnant or will become pregnant during treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: The Invisalign System
Class II correction of malocclusions
|
The Invisalign® System is indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of malocclusion
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Tooth Movement at the End of Class II Correction.
Time Frame: End of Class II Correction up to 18 months
|
The primary objective will be met through demonstrating that the velocity of Invisalign with MRF overjet correction is non-inferior to the published rates of Dynamax (0.42mm/month).
|
End of Class II Correction up to 18 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Treatment Time
Time Frame: End of Treatment approximately 2 years
|
This is the total treatment length of time that subjects took (in days) to complete Invisalign system treatment
|
End of Treatment approximately 2 years
|
|
Patient Quality of Life Questionnaire Throughout Treatment
Time Frame: End of Treatment approximately 2 years
|
As part of the secondary objective, subject perception was assessed through analysis of case report forms.
Case report form analysis of the Quality of Life forms was conducted from the subjects in both the Clinical Study and Continued Access Clinical Study.
Subjects were asked to rate their orthodontic experience throughout the course of the study, with options 1(very difficult), 2 (difficult), 3 (average), 4 (easy), and 5 (very easy) as the ratings.
|
End of Treatment approximately 2 years
|
|
Doctor Survey for Satisfaction With Treatment Outcomes
Time Frame: End of Treatment approximately 2 years
|
Doctors filled out a Doctor Survey with a scale rating of 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy) on how easy the product was to use and their satisfaction with the product.
A higher score on the scale meant a better satisfaction experience .
|
End of Treatment approximately 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Sherri Wilson-Lopes, Align Technology, Inc.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MRF-002
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.