Randomized Controlled Trial of Higher-Volume Feedings in Preterm Neonates

June 14, 2018 updated by: Colm Travers, University of Alabama at Birmingham
The primary hypothesis is that preterm infants who are less than or equal to 32 weeks gestation and weigh 1001-2500 grams at birth will have an increase in weight gain with a feeding goal of 180-200 ml/kg/day more than the commonly used feeding goal of 140-160 ml/kg/day

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The proposed trial is designed to test the primary hypothesis that in preterm infants weighing 1001-2500 grams at birth and who are less than or equal to 32 weeks gestation, feeding goals of 180-200 ml/kg/day will increase weight gain (g/k/day) from time of enrollment to discharge home or 36 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA)(whichever comes first) more than the commonly used feeding goal volume of 140-160 ml/kg/day (usual feeding goal). This is a pilot study to determine the safety of increased volumes of feedings as opposed to fortification of feedings.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
224

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 1 month (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inborn or outborn infants born at a gestational age of 32 weeks or less; Birthweight 1001-2500; Feeding volume of at least 120 ml/kg/day; Enrolled prior to 28 days of age and prior to exceeding 32 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosis; History of necrotizing enterocolitis Bell Stage II or greater; Known gastrointestinal or neurologic malformations; Prior or planned enrollment into the NICHD MILK Trial; Terminal illness or decision to withhold or limit support

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Higher Volume Feeding Goal
Infants randomized to this group will have higher volume feeding goals of 180-200 ml/kg/day.
Other: Higher Volume Feeding Goal
feeding volume goal of 180-200 ml/kg/day
No Intervention: Usual Volume Feeding Goal
Infants randomized to this group will have feeding goals of 140-160 ml/kg/day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight gain
Time Frame: baseline to average 12 weeks of age
Average change in weight between baseline and 12 weeks
baseline to average 12 weeks of age

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mid arm circumference
Time Frame: baseline to average 12 weeks of age
average change in mid arm circumference between baseline and 12 weeks
baseline to average 12 weeks of age
Length
Time Frame: baseline to average 12 weeks of age
average change in length between baseline and 12 weeks
baseline to average 12 weeks of age
Head circumference
Time Frame: baseline to average 12 weeks of age
average change in head circumference between baseline and 12 weeks
baseline to average 12 weeks of age
Caloric intake
Time Frame: 36 weeks
Average difference in weekly caloric intake between groups
36 weeks
Length of stay
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Days from study entry to discharge home
36 weeks or discharge
Rates of infants less than 10th percentile for weight
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Rates of infants less than 10th percentile for weight at study completion
36 weeks or discharge
Change in weight z score
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Change in weight z score from study entry to completion
36 weeks or discharge
Change in length z score
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Change in length z score from study entry to completion
36 weeks or discharge
Change in head circumference z score
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Change in head circumference z score from study entry to completion
36 weeks or discharge

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body fat composition
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Percentage of body fat composition
36 weeks or discharge
Rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (Bell Stage ≥ 2)
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Safety outcome: Rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (Bell Stage ≥ 2)
36 weeks or discharge
Rates of feeding intolerance
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Safety outcome: Rates of feeding intolerance defined as withholding feeds for > 24 hours due to gastrointestinal cause after study entry
36 weeks or discharge
Rates of culture proven sepsis
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Safety outcome: Rates of blood culture positive sepsis after study entry
36 weeks or discharge
Duration of respiratory support
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Safety outcome: Duration of respiratory support (oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure/high flow nasal cannula/mechanical ventilation) after study entry
36 weeks or discharge
Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Safety outcome: Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia
36 weeks or discharge
Rates of moderate to large or symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Safety outcome: Rates of moderate to large or symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus after study entry
36 weeks or discharge
Rates of adverse safety outcomes combined
Time Frame: 36 weeks or discharge
Safety outcome: Safety outcome: Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis ≥ stage 2, feeding intolerance, culture proven sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus after study entry
36 weeks or discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Colm Travers, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Ariel A Salas, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 1, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UAB NEO 013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings