Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and/or Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture in Myofascial Chronic Pain Patients
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and/or Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture in the Rehabilitation of Patients With Myofascial Chronic Pain
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Wolnei Caumo, PhD
- Phone Number: 55 51 33598083
- Email: caumo@cpovo.net
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Iraci S Torres, PhD
- Phone Number: 55 51 33598083
- Email: iracitorres@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Rio Grande do Sul
-
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Recruiting
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre - HCPA
-
Contact:
- Wolnei Caumo, PhD
- Phone Number: +55 51 33598083
- Email: caumo@cpovo.net
-
Contact:
- Iraci LS Torres, PhD
- Phone Number: +55 51 33598083
- Email: iracitorres@gmail.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Liciane F Medeiros, MsC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Providing informed consent to participate in the study ;
- 18 to 70 years old;
- Myofascial pain in the cranial- cervical- mandibular complex, with duration more than 3 months;
- In the last week, score higher or equal to 3cm (0 cm = 'no pain' and 10cm ='worst possible pain') on the VAS for pain perception at the baseline in the most part of seven days before;
- Refractoriness to drugs for pain relieve - such as tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs and/or narcotics (pain resistant to at least 2 of these drugs supplied in adequate dosages for six months).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inflammatory chronic disease;
- Neurological deficits;
- History of substance abuse;
- Neuropsychiatric co-morbidity;
- Systemic diseases not well balance;
- Habitual use of anti-inflammatory steroids;
- Implanted devices for pain control, such as vagal or deep brain stimulators;
- Contraindications to rTMS: metal in the head, implanted brain medical devices, previous convulsion or epilepsy, serious cranial trauma, audition problem, cochlear implant, neurostimulador implantable, spinal cord surgery, bypass valve ventriculoperitoneal peritonenal,cardiac pacemaker or other metal in the body;
- Pregnancy;
- Prior experience with acupuncture.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Both Sham rTMS and Neuroacupuncture
Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of both sham treatments.
Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMSat 10hHz (1600pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without current connection over peripheral region.
|
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) with Placebo coil
Neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without needles
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Active rTMS and sham Neuroacupuncture
Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of active rTMS and sham neurofunctional electrical acupuncture treatments.
Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS at 10Hz (1600 pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without current connection over peripheral region.
|
Neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without needles
Other Names:
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) 10Hz (1600 pulses)
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS and Active Neuroacupuncture
Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of sham rTMS and active Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture.
Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS placebo coil over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture at 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes over peripheral region.
|
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) with Placebo coil
Neurofunctional electrical acupuncture 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Both Active rTMS and Neuroacupuncture
Experimental Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of both active treatments.
Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS at 10 Hz (1600 pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture at 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes over peripheral region.
|
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) 10Hz (1600 pulses)
Neurofunctional electrical acupuncture 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain severity
Time Frame: up to three months after the end of treatment
|
The intensity of pain was measured by a 10-cm VAS.
VAS scores ranged from no pain (zero) to the worst possible pain (10cm).
|
up to three months after the end of treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral Biochemical Markers
Time Frame: The difference in the baseline, after one week of treatment and the end of the treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).
|
Different peripheral biochemical: BDNF, TNF, S100 beta, interleukins, LDH, oxidative stress, catecolamines serum levels; 6-sulphatoxymelatonin urinary; salivary cortisol.
|
The difference in the baseline, after one week of treatment and the end of the treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).
|
|
Parameters of motor cortex excitability
Time Frame: The variation between the baseline and the end of treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).
|
Parameters of cortical excitability: motor threshold, motor-evoked potential, intracortical inhibition and facilitation, cortical silent period using transcranial magnetic stimulation technique.
|
The variation between the baseline and the end of treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).
|
|
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline (before the treatment) and after the treatment (after last session of treatment and follow-up of two weeks, one month and three months after the end of treatment )
|
Using Quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-bref) with 26 questions.
|
Baseline (before the treatment) and after the treatment (after last session of treatment and follow-up of two weeks, one month and three months after the end of treatment )
|
|
Functional Capacity
Time Frame: Baseline (before the treatment) and after the treatment (after last session of treatment and follow-up of two weeks, one month and three months after the end of treatment ).
|
Using The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Profile of Chronic Pain.
|
Baseline (before the treatment) and after the treatment (after last session of treatment and follow-up of two weeks, one month and three months after the end of treatment ).
|
|
Pain threshold
Time Frame: The variation between the baseline and the end of treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).
|
Pain threshold assessed by algometer (pain pressure threshold) and quantitative sensory
|
The variation between the baseline and the end of treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Wolnei Caumo, PhD, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Botelho L, Angoleri L, Zortea M, Deitos A, Brietzke A, Torres ILS, Fregni F, Caumo W. Insights About the Neuroplasticity State on the Effect of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation in Pain and Disability Associated With Chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 16;12:388. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00388. eCollection 2018.
- Medeiros LF, Caumo W, Dussan-Sarria J, Deitos A, Brietzke A, Laste G, Campos-Carraro C, de Souza A, Scarabelot VL, Cioato SG, Vercelino R, de Castro AL, Araujo AS, Bello-Klein A, Fregni F, Torres IL. Effect of Deep Intramuscular Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurophysiological Biomarkers in Chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Pain Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):122-35. doi: 10.1111/pme.12919.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HCPA-TMS
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.