Open-Label Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 in Subjects With IGA Nephropathy on Stable RAAS Blockade

March 4, 2025 updated by: Amgen

An Open-Label Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 in Subjects With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy on Stable RAAS Blockade

The primary safety objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CCX168 in subjects with IgAN on background supportive therapy with a maximally tolerated dose of RAAS blockade. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CCX168 based on an improvement in proteinuria.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Study acquired by Amgen and all disclosures were done by previous sponsor ChemoCentryx.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Stockholm, Sweden
  • United States
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States
      • San Francisco, California, United States
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Immunoglobulin A nephropathy
  • estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Proteinuria (first morning urinary protein:creatinine ratio >1g/g creatinine)

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe renal disease
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Proteinuria >8g/g creatinine or >8g/day
  • Systemic manifestations of Henoch-Schonlein purpura within 2 years prior
  • Patients with Immunoglobulin A nephropathy deemed secondary to underlying disease
  • Biopsy reported severe crescentic Immunoglobulin A nephropathy
  • History of treatment with glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or any biologic immunomodulatory agent with 24 weeks prior
  • History of clinically significant cardiac conditions
  • History of cancer within 5 years prior
  • Any infection requiring antibiotic treatment that has not cleared prior to study start

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CCX168 (Avacopan)
CCX168 (Avacopan) plus stable dose of RAAS blocker
Drug: CCX168
CCX168 30 mg, twice daily (b.i.d.) orally for 84 days (12 weeks). The CCX168 dose was taken in the morning, optimally within one hour after breakfast, and in the evening, optimally within one hour after dinner.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Slope of First Morning Urinary PCR From the 8-week RAAS Blocker run-in Period to the 12-week CCX168 Treatment Period
Time Frame: Week -8 to -1 (Run-in period) and Week 1 to 12 (treatment period)
The mean change in the slope of the urinary protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR, in mg/g/week) between the 8-week run-in period and the 12-week treatment period
Week -8 to -1 (Run-in period) and Week 1 to 12 (treatment period)
Number of Participants With AE's
Time Frame: Day 0 - Day 169 (throughout the trial)
Acronyms use: Adverse Events (AE's) Serious Adverse Events (SAE's)
Day 0 - Day 169 (throughout the trial)
Severity of Adverse Events (AE's)
Time Frame: Day 0 - Day 169 (throughout the trial)
Acronyms use: Adverse Events (AE's) Serious Adverse Events (SAE's)
Day 0 - Day 169 (throughout the trial)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects Achieving Renal Response From Baseline to Day 85
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 85
Renal Response defined as an improvement in proteinuria based on a decrease from baseline to Day 85 in proteinuria to a level <300 mg/g creatinine and maintaining eGFR within 15% of baseline.
Baseline and Day 85
Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Partial Renal Response From Baseline to Day 85
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 85
A partial renal response, defined as an improvement in proteinuria based on a decrease from baseline to Day 85 in proteinuria to a level <1 g/g creatinine and maintaining eGFR within 15% of baseline.
Baseline and Day 85
Change From Baseline to Day 85 in Vital Signs
Time Frame: Baseline to day 85
Baseline to day 85
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Day 85
Time Frame: Baseline to day 85
Baseline to day 85
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Day 85
Time Frame: Baseline to day 85
Baseline to day 85
Change in Temperature From Baseline to Day 85
Time Frame: Baseline to day 85
Baseline to day 85
Change in Weight From Baseline to Day 85
Time Frame: Baseline to day 85
Baseline to day 85

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: MD, Amgen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 27, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 13, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CL005_168
  • 2014-003402-33 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings