Hospitalization & Mortality in Patients With Iron Deficiency CKD and HF Treated With i.v. Iron.

March 18, 2015 updated by: Jorge Eduardo Toblli, Hospital Aleman

Hospitalization and Mortality in Iron Deficient, Anemic Patients With Chronic Kidney (CKD) and Heart Failure Receiving Intravenous Iron Therapy: A Five Year Follow-up From a Pilot Study

Iron deficiency, independent of anemia, appears to increase morbidity and mortality as well as impairing health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure (CHF), and these effects are compounded when patients also experience chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study was designed to determine the effects of intravenous iron treatment on morbidity and mortality following an initial 6-month period and a longer period of up to 5 years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Effect of i.v. iron sucrose on iron parameters and anemia

  • During the original 6 month trial, patients in the i.v. iron group received 1000mg iron per the protocol. No patients required iron in the subsequent 6 months.
  • During the subsequent follow-up, patients required a mean of between 165 and 274 mg iron per year (range: 0 to 600 mg per patient per year).
  • Post the initial 1000mg iron, 19 out of 20 patients required at least a second dose of i.v. iron. Most patients required only one or two doses per year.
  • The average time to requiring a second iron administration was 14.5 ± 2.7 months (range: 14 months, 23 months).
  • Correction of iron deficiency (ID) resulted in statistically significant increases in transferrin saturation (TSAT) throughout the study (p < 0.01 untreated group). At all measured points, TSAT values in the treated group were at least on target (> 20% increase).
  • For serum ferritin, significant differences were observed at 6 months and 1 year however this difference was not observed at 5 years post baseline where serum ferritin values were 173ng/mL and 167ng/mL for the control and IV iron groups, respectively.
  • Statistically significant improvements versus the untreated group were observed for both hemoglobin (Hb) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) as well as for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at each year.

Effect of i.v. iron sucrose on hospitalizations and mortality

  • There were numerically fewer hospitalization reported at 6 months compared to those among untreated patients (0% and 25%, respectively), although the difference versus untreated patients was not statistically significant (p=ns).
  • At 1 year after commencing the original study, the number of patients requiring a hospitalization (for any reason) was 50% in the control group and 10% in the IV iron group (p<0.01).
  • By 5 years follow-up these rates had increased to 85% in the control arm and 20% in the IV iron treated group (p<0.01).
  • In relation to all-cause mortality, there were no deaths in either group after the first 6 months. The number of deaths due to any cause after year 1 had increased in both groups (20% in the untreated group, 5% in the treated group; p=ns).
  • At 5 years follow-up, 11 (55%) of patients in the control arm were deceased, compared with 4 (20%) in the IV iron treated group (p < 0.05).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Argentina
    • Caba
      • Buenos Aires, Caba, Argentina, 1118
        • Hospital Aleman

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion:

  • LV ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35%
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to IV
  • Anemia with an iron deficit defined by Hb 12.5 g/dl for men and 11.5 g/dl for women, and some of the following: serum ferritin 100 ng/ml and/or with transferrin saturation (TSAT) 20%
  • Creatinine clearance 90 ml/min.

Exclusion:

  • Hemodialysis therapy
  • Anemia not due to iron deficiency
  • NYHA functional class I
  • History of allergy to the iron supplements
  • Acute bacterial infections, parasitism known in the 4 previous weeks
  • Neoplasm
  • Chronic digestive diseases
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Congenital cardiopathies
  • Receiving iron supplements in the 4 previous weeks
  • Receiving rhEPO in the 4 previous weeks
  • History of hospitalization during the 4 weeks before enrollment into the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Group A
Placebo
Drug: Placebo
At each visit, the patient lay on a stretcher and underwent a vein cannulation in the forearm with a commercial canula no. 16, which was connected to IV tubing that was connected to a bag of isotonic saline solution 0.9% (200 ml). Each infusion was administered throughout 60 min. This scheme was followed for 5 consecutive weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sodium Chloride 0.9%
Other: Group B
Iron Sucrose
Drug: Iron Sucrose
At each visit, the patient lay on a stretcher and underwent a vein cannulation in the forearm with a commercial canula no. 16, which was connected to IV tubing that was connected to a bag contained 200 ml isotonic saline solution 0.9% plus 200 mg of Iron Sucrose. Each infusion was administered throughout 60 min. This scheme was followed for 5 consecutive weeks.
Other Names:
  • Venofer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
mortality
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hospitalization
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Aleman

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jorge E Toblli, MD; PhD, Hospital Aleman

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 19, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 5427-06/07

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings