Peer-to-Peer Support Program in Improving Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer and Their Caregivers

May 4, 2018 updated by: City of Hope Medical Center

Quality of Life Outcomes From a Peer-to-Peer Support Program for Women With Gynecologic Cancer

This pilot clinical trial studies a peer-to-peer support program in improving quality of life outcomes in patients with gynecologic cancer and their caregivers. Peer-to-peer support and mentoring may help improve quality of life and reduce symptoms of distress in gynecologic cancer patients and their families.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To test the feasibility and acceptability of a Woman-to-Woman (W2W) program for patients with gynecologic cancer at City of Hope (COH). Address the following descriptive research questions: were patients, mentors, and patients' family caregivers satisfied with the timing, format, and content of the program? Did the program benefit patients, mentors, and patients' family caregivers?

OUTLINE:

Patients participate in the W2W program for which they are matched with a trained mentor and followed throughout treatment by phone, email, and/or in person.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 6 and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENT PARTICIPANTS
  • Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent gynecologic cancer (ovarian, uterine, cervical, vaginal, vulvar) actively undergoing treatment (chemotherapy, surgery, or radiation therapy) at COH (including Duarte and South Pasadena campuses)
  • English-speaking patients
  • PEER MENTORS
  • Peer mentors will be past gynecologic cancer patients not currently undergoing treatment for their cancer, and considered without evidence of disease
  • Over age 18
  • PEER MENTORS: English-speaking patients
  • This study is open to patients of all races and ethnicities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PEER MENTORS:
  • Major psychiatric disease
  • Currently undergoing treatment for active gynecologic cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Supportive care (W2W program)
Patients participate in the W2W program for which they are matched with a trained mentor and followed throughout treatment by phone, email, and/or in person.
Complete W2W mentoring program
Other Names:
  • Supportive Therapy
  • Symptom Management
  • Therapy, Supportive
Complete the FACT-G
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Complete the W2W Patient Survey

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life benefits for patients, as assessed by the FACT-G
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 12 months
Changes from baseline will be tested using paired t-tests. Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics, including means for normally distributed continuous data, medians for non-normally distributed continuous data or proportions for categorical data. Established instruments will be scored according to standard instructions, and appropriate descriptive statistics computed. Written comments from all open ended questions analyzed using content analysis methods.
Baseline to up to 12 months
Satisfaction of patients with the timing, content, and format of the program, as assessed by the W2W Patient Survey
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Changes from baseline will be tested using paired t-tests. Descriptive statistics on participants' satisfaction with the timing, content, and format of the intervention will be presented through summary statistics of data from the satisfaction tools. Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics, including means for normally distributed continuous data, medians for non-normally distributed continuous data or proportions for categorical data.
Up to 12 months
Satisfaction of mentors with the timing, content, and format of the program, as assessed by the W2W Volunteer/Mentor Survey
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Descriptive statistics on participants' satisfaction with the timing, content, and format of the intervention will be presented through summary statistics of data from the satisfaction tools.
Up to 12 months
Satisfaction of patients' family caregivers with the timing, content, and format of the program
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Changes from baseline will be tested using paired t-tests. Descriptive statistics on participants' satisfaction with the timing, content, and format of the intervention will be presented through summary statistics of data from the satisfaction tools.
Up to 12 months
Benefits for patients' family caregivers after participating in the program, as assessed by the Modified Caregiver Strain Index
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics, including means for normally distributed continuous data, medians for non-normally distributed continuous data or proportions for categorical data. Established instruments will be scored according to standard instructions, and appropriate descriptive statistics computed. Written comments from all open ended questions analyzed using content analysis methods.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thanh Dellinger, MD, City of Hope Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14359 (Other Identifier: City of Hope Medical Center)
  • NCI-2015-00467 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Supportive Care

Search Similar Trials