Efficacy of Localized Concurrent Chemo-radiation Therapy and Sorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

February 21, 2019 updated by: Yonsei University

Efficacy of Localized Concurrent Chemo-radiation Therapy and Sorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Prospective Phase 2 Trial

This is a single-center, single-arm, open-label, prospective phase 2 trial to assess the efficacy of localized concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) and sorafenib sequential therapy in subjects with advanced HCC. Approximately 47 subjects will be enrolled and will receive CCRT and sorafenib sequentially until all-cause mortality.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, single-arm, open-label, prospective phase 2 trial to assess the efficacy of localized concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) and sorafenib sequential therapy in subjects with advanced HCC. Approximately 47 subjects will be enrolled and will receive CCRT and sorafenib sequentially until all-cause mortality.

Sorafenib is the current standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients following clinical results from the two pivotal trials in Western and Asian patients. The median overall survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are treated with sorafenib have shown to be approximately 14 months. However in the presence of portal vein invasion or extrahepatic metastases, the median overall survival is significantly lowered to 5.6 - 8.9 months.

Going forward, improvement in patient-related outcomes would be highly desirable.

A pilot study has been conducted in subjects with advanced HCC with portal vein invasion for which effective therapeutic methods have not been established. This was a single-center, open-label study of localized concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) for locally advanced HCC patients with portal vein invasion. A total of 40 subjects with advanced HCC with portal vein invasion were enrolled. The subjects were treated with a total of 45 Gy of external beam radiotherapy (1.8 Gy per session, 5 sessions a week, for 5 weeks), with hepatic arterial infusion of 5-flourouracil (5-FU) during the first and last 5 days of radiation therapy (5-FU 500 mg infusion for 5 hours) through the pre-inserted chemoport. Eighteen (45%) subjects had an objective tumor response at 1 month after completion of localized CCRT. The 3-year survival rate was 24.2% and median overall survival was 13.1 months.

Treatment-related serious adverse events (CTCAE grade 3 or higher) were anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis and liver decompensation, and their rates were 2.5%, 2.4-5.0%, 17.5%, 10% and 7.3-17.5%, respectively. In addition, 2.4-5.0% of adverse events were chemoport-related adverse events including infection and port obstruction.

Although sorafenib has been shown to increase overall survival in advanced HCC patients as compared to placebo through anti-angiogenesis effect, its tumoricidal effect is not evident. Meanwhile, based on the above analysis from the pilot study, localized CCRT has been regarded as a promising treatment with tumoricidal effect for advanced HCC patients. Therefore, combining sorafenib treatment with CCRT is anticipated to augment anti-tumor effect and improve tumor response and median overall survival.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have confirmed diagnosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) categorized to stage C based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system with any of following criteria: 1) Lesion limited to a single lobe that is within the radiotherapy field, 2) Lesion not limited to a single lobe, but the lesion that is not within the radiotherapy field can be controlled by transarterial chemoembolization or radiofrequency ablation, 3) Presence of metastatic lesions that measure < 1.0 cm in the long axis, 4) The lesion can be accurately measured in at least one dimension as ≥ 1.0 cm
  • Males or females aged at least 20 years and below 76 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0 or 1
  • Adequate liver function, defined as: 1) Child-Pugh score ≤ 7, 2) Bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL
  • Adequate bone marrow function, defined as: 1) Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 × 109/L, 2) White blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 4.0 × 109/L, 3) Platelet count ≥ 60 × 109/L
  • Adequate renal function, defined as serum creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL
  • Subjects with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC must have adequately controlled HBV replication status
  • Adequate blood coagulation factors, defined as international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 2.3
  • Provide written informed consent
  • Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant liver function impairment, defined as bilirubin > 3.0 mg/dL or uncontrolled ascites
  • Imaging findings for HCC corresponding to any of the following: 1) Diffuse HCC with > 50% liver occupation, that is not adequate for external radiotherapy, 2) Presence of metastatic lesions that measure ≥ 1.0 cm in the long axis
  • Uncontrolled significant active infection
  • Presence of active malignancy (except for HCC)
  • Females who are lactating or pregnant; females of childbearing potential who have not received pregnancy test or shown positive on pregnancy test
  • Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude the subject's participation in a clinical study
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CCRT-sorafenib group
Radiation: CCRT
The subject is treated with a total of 45 Gy of external beam radiotherapy (1.8 Gy per session, 5 sessions a week, for 5 weeks), with hepatic arterial infusion of 5-flourouracil (5-FU) during the first and last 5 days of radiation therapy (5-FU 500 mg infusion for 5 hours) for radiosensitization through the pre-inserted chemoport.
Other Names:
  • Localized concurrent chemoradiation therapy(CCRT)
Drug: sorafenib
Four weeks after completion of CCRT, the subject is given daily sorafenib treatment and will be followed for survival.
Other Names:
  • sorafenib(Nexavar®) sequential therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 36 months after the enrollment
36 months after the enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFSL defined as dynamic CT scan
Time Frame: 36 months after the enrollment
Progression-free survival in the liver(PFSL)
36 months after the enrollment
PFSO defined as definitive imaging technique
Time Frame: 36 months after the enrollment
progression-free survival overall (PFSO)
36 months after the enrollment
tumor response defined as modified RECIST
Time Frame: 36 months after the enrollment
36 months after the enrollment
toxicity defined as NCI-CTC(version 4.02)
Time Frame: 36 months after the enrollment
toxicity defined as National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (version 4.02)
36 months after the enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yonsei University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Beom Kyung Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Severance Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 3, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 22, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 22, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 4-2014-0803

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings