Impact of RUTF on Body Composition, Anemia and Zinc Status of PLWHA (PLWHA)

April 29, 2015 updated by: Jean Louis Ndiaye, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Senegal

Daily Consumption of Ready-to-use Peanut-based Therapeutic Food Increased Fat Free Mass, Improved Anemia Status But Has no Impact on Zinc Status of People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLWHA)

A clinical trial was conducted in 65 PLWH randomly allocated to receive standard hospital diet alone (Control group: n=33), or the diet combined with 100 g/day of RUTF (RUTF group: n=32). Individual dietary intakes were measured and compared to the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) for PLWH. Body composition was measured by bio-impedance analysis (BIA), hemoglobin by HemoCue and plasma zinc concentration by atomic absorption spectrometry and adjusted to infection (CRP and α1-AGP). All measures were conducted at baseline, 3 weeks and after 9 weeks home-based follow up.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The sample size of the study (n=17 in each group) was calculated takin into account the mean gain of fat free mass (2.3± 2.1 kg) obtained in a study of PLWH supplemented with 43 g of RUTF/day. The randomization was performed upon admission using a computer-generated random number list (EPI INFO 6.0; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta).

Dietary intakes were measured during 7 consecutive days in 10 subjects of each group during the hospitalization period. Each meal served was weighed with a food scale (i-Balance 2600 Myweigh, Phoenix, USA).

Anthropometrics measurement was performed using standard procedures. Measure of height was made using height board (SECA 216, GmbH et Co, Hamburg, Germany), to the nearest millimeter. Body weight was measured with an electronic scale (SECA 877, GmbH & Co, Hamburg, Germany).

Body composition was measured using a multifrequency analyser, Xitron 4000B. The accuracy of the instrument was tested before the measurements by using a 422 ohm standard resistor purchased with the analyzer. Blood sampling was performed in the morning between 8 -10 AM into trace element-free polyethylene tubes zinc-free containing lithium heparin anticoagulant. The time of the sample collection and of the most recent food or milk intake were noted and used to adjust for this interval in the analysis of data. All the parameters were mesured in duplicate on admission, at 3 weeks and 9 weeks home based follup up.

Double entry data, and quality control of the entry were performed using Epi-Info version 3.5.1 (CDC, Atlanta, USA) and access. Statistical analysis was performed by Excel 2003 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA) and STATA / SE 11.0 (Stata Corporation, Texas, and USA). Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and percentage. PZ concentration was adjusted for the time interval between the last meal and the blood drawing to minimize the variability due to the known meal-related effects on PZ concentration and from infections/inflammation [28]. Zinc deficiency was defined according to IZINCG cut-off. ANOVA followed by post-hoc Bonferroni tests for pairwise comparison of means or Student's t-test were also used on dependent measures. The Pearson Chi2 test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare percentages. P values 0.05 were considered as significant.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
65

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Senegal
      • Dakar, Senegal
        • University Cheikh Anta Diop

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV/AIDS men and women
  • at any WHO stages of HIV disease,
  • under ART treatment or not,
  • without psychiatric illness and not diabetic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • confirmed HIV-negative,
  • long term physical disability
  • inability to eat

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Control
Control group (n=33) didn't received intervention. The received the standard hospital diet
Experimental: Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF)
RUTF group (n=32) received the standard hospital diet combined with 100 g/day of RUTF
Dietary supplement: Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF)
HIV-infected patients were randomly allocated to receive standard hospital diet (Control: n=33), or this diet combined with 100 g/day of RUTF (RUTF: n=32). All patients was follow-up during hospitalisation and 9 week after discharge at home
Other Names:
  • RUTF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in body composition at 9 weeks
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Body composition was measured using Bio-impedance analysis method at baseline, and 9 weeks home-based follow-up in both supplemented and control groups
9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline on anemia at 3 weeks
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Hemoglobin was measured by Hemocue photometer at baseline and 3 week after admission in both supplemented and control groups
3 weeks
Change from baseline on anemia at 9 weeks
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Hemoglobin was measured by Hemocue photometer at baseline and after 9 weeks home-based follow-up in both supplemented and control groups
9 weeks
Change from baseline on plasma zinc concentration at 3 weeks
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Plasma zinc concentration was determined by Atomic absorption spectrometry at baseline and 3 weeks after admission in both supplemented and control groups
3 weeks
Change from baseline on plasma zinc concentration at 9 weeks
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Plasma zinc concentration was determined by Atomic absorption spectrometry at baseline and after 9 weeks home-based follow-up in both supplemented and control groups
9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cheikh Anta Diop University, Senegal

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
UNICEF

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Salimata Wade, Professor, Universite Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 29, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UCheikhAntaDiop

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings