Standardized Ambulatory Neurorehabilitation Program for Patients With Multiple Sclerosis ("MS-Fit")

February 28, 2019 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Standardized Comprehensive Two-month Ambulatory Neurorehabilitation Program for Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized-controlled Trial

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and the most common cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults in western countries. Despite increasing therapeutic options to ameliorate the disease course, most patients suffer from persistent neurological deficits over time.

Disability in MS has a negative impact on patients life's impairing activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QoL) and leading to loss of work and the need providing care. This results in tremendous socioeconomic burden.

Disease-modifying treatments prevent disability progression in variable extent. However no drugs are available ameliorate persistent disability in MS. Therefore, exercise training as well as physical and occupational therapies are important in the symptomatic treatment of MS.

Physical and occupational therapy is usually performed close to patients home by therapist with different professional background in a non-standardized way.

The investigators therefore aim to develop a standardized comprehensive ambulatory neurorehabilitation program, integrating task oriented circuit training for MS patients to improve disability, ADL and QoL that can be easily adopted in other ambulatory or hospital settings.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and the most common cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults in western countries. The incidence of MS is low in childhood and increases after the age of 18, reaching a peak between 20 and 40 years (mean age of 30 years) with women being affected approximately 2-5 years earlier than men. In Switzerland the incidence is thought to be 4:100.000 with approximately 12.500 affected patients.

Despite increasing therapeutic options to ameliorate the disease course, most patients suffer from persistent neurological deficits over time.

Neurologic symptoms can be manifold and are highly variable amongst patients. They include loss of vision, sensorimotor defects, impaired manual dexterity, ataxia, apraxia, gait disturbances, bladder- and bowl problems, fatigue, cognitive dysfunctions and others, which alone, or in combination, lead to disability in MS patients. Disability in MS has a negative impact on patients life's impairing activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QoL) and leading to loss of work and the need providing care. This results in tremendous socioeconomic burden.

Disease-modifying treatments prevent disability progression in variable extent. However no drugs are available ameliorate persistent disability in MS. Therefore, exercise training as well as physical and occupational therapies are important in the symptomatic treatment of MS. Intensive task oriented circuit training has been shown to be effective in stroke improving gait, and several ADL. Some pilot randomized controlled trials in MS demonstrated exercise training being able to improve muscular strength, aerobic capacity and ambulatory performance as well as fatigue, balance and gait. Furthermore, specific therapies improve manual dexterity, coordination and mobilization in MS patients as well. Although, so far no randomized trial has been done to prove the effectiveness of task oriented circuit training in MS.

Physical and occupational therapy is usually performed close to patients home by therapist with different professional background in a non-standardized way.

The investigators therefore aim to develop a standardized comprehensive ambulatory neurorehabilitation program, integrating task oriented circuit training for MS patients to improve disability, ADL and QoL that can be easily adopted in other ambulatory or hospital settings.

Objective

To evaluate the impact of a standardized comprehensive ambulatory neurorehabilitation program on disability in patients with multiple sclerosis measured by performance based test of the upper and lower extremities and by patient recorded outcome measures regarding functioning of the upper and lower extremities, activities of daily living and quality of life.

The investigators hypothesize that this training program will improve disability, activities of daily living and quality of live in MS patients.

Methods

Prospective double center, randomized, cross-over study. Consecutive MS patients that complain about disability that affects ADL and/or QoL will be recruited to participate in a comprehensive ambulatory neurorehabilitation program. Afterwards baseline measurements will be performed and patients will be randomized 1:1 into the early treatment group or the delayed treatment group in groups of four using sealed envelopes. The early treatment group starts the neurorehabilitation program whereas in the delayed treatment group, patients will be put on a waiting list for two months. After two months, outcome measurements will be collected. Patients of the early treatment group stop the neurorehabilitation program and patients of the delayed treatment group start the neurorehabilitation program for two months ("cross-over design"). Two months after ending the program, each group will be retested.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
65

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital
      • Luzern, Switzerland, 6000
        • Department of Neurology, Cantonal hospital Luzern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • MS patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), secondary-progressive MS (SPMS) or primary progressive MS (PPMS)
  • Age between 18 and 75 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Patient complains about MS related disability that affects ADL and/or QoL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A relapse that started within 60 days prior to screening
  • Rapidly progressive disease
  • Any disease/condition that causes neurological deficits or disability besides MS
  • A history of drug abuse in the 12 months prior to screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Neurorehabilitation program
Standardized comprehensive ambulatory neurorehabilitation program
Other: Early treatment group
Physical- and occupational Therapy
Placebo Comparator: Waiting list
Other: Late treatment group
Waiting list - then Physical- and occupational Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29 (MSIS-29)
Time Frame: 2 - 4 months
The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) is valid and reliable (ICC 0.80 - 0.87) in measuring the impact of MS on ADL.It contains 29 items comprising to a physical (MSIS-29 physical) and psychological impact scale (MSIS-29 psychological). All items are scored from 'not at all' to 'extremely' on a five-point Likert scale.
2 - 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Coin Rotation Task (Heldner et al. 2014)
Time Frame: 0 - 2 - 4 months
The Coin Rotation Task (CRT) has been validated in assessing manual dexterity in patients with MS. Patients had to rotate a 50 Swiss Rappen coin (corresponding to a dime or 2-cent Euro coin) as fast as possible between their thumb, index and middle finger. The time to perform 20 half turns was measured twice on both hands and mean values were taken for each hand. If patients could not perform the CRT due to impaired manual dexterity, an arbitrarily chosen value of 300 seconds was taken.
0 - 2 - 4 months
Change from baseline in Timed Up and Go (TUG) (Nilsagard et al. 2007)
Time Frame: 0 - 2 - 4 months
The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a test used to assess a person's mobility. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three metres, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
0 - 2 - 4 months
Change from baseline in Nine-hole-Peg Test (NHPT) (Gookin et al. 1988)
Time Frame: 0 - 2 - 4 months
The Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is reliable (ICC values 0.80-0.99), valid and sensitive in detecting impaired dexterity in patients with MS. Patients were seated at a table with a shallow container holding nine pegs and a plastic block with nine empty holes. All pegs had to be put one at a time into the holes and then removed again one at a time into the shallow container. The time to complete the task was recorded twice on both hands and mean values were taken for each hand. If patients could not perform the CRT due to impaired manual dexterity, an arbitrarily chosen value of 300 seconds was taken.
0 - 2 - 4 months
Change from baseline in 25-Foot Walk Test (25-FWT) (Cohen et al. 2014)
Time Frame: 0 - 2 - 4 months
The T25-FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed 25-walk. It is the first component of the MSFC to be administered at each visit. The patient is directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and is instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible, but safely. The time is calculated from the initiation of the instruction to start and ends when the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. The task is immediately administered again by having the patient walk back the same distance. Patients may use assistive devices when doing this task.
0 - 2 - 4 months
Change from baseline in EDSS
Time Frame: 0 - 2 - 4 months
0 - 2 - 4 months
Change from baseline in Rand 36
Time Frame: 0 - 2 - 4 months
The RAND-36 is a license free version of the Short-Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) containing eight scales.15 Each scale comprises two to ten items, and makes up to two summary measures. The scales measuring "physical functioning", "role-physical", "bodily pain" and "general health" form the "physical health summary score". The scales measuring "vitality", "social functioning", "role-emotional" and "mental health" form the "mental health summary score".
0 - 2 - 4 months
Change from baseline in Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: 0 - 2 - 4 months
0 - 2 - 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christian P Kamm, MD, Department of Neurology, Cantonal hospital Luzern

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015_04_29

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Early treatment group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings