Efficacy of Modified FUT Protocols in Relation to CR Protocol
Efficacy of Modified FUT Protocols With 12 and 24 Hours of Upper Limb Immobilization in Relation to CR Arm Protocol.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
SP
-
Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil, 14026514
- Tamyris Padovani dos Santos
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Good cognition,
- Absence of joint blocks,
- Good range of motion in upper limb with at least 20º of active extension of the wrist and 10º in the metacarpal phalangeal,
- Joint and walking capacity without assistance.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Heart arrhythmia,
- Hypertension,
- Severe cardiovascular and respiratory problems,
- Inability to attend the sessions.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Forced Use Therapy
Constriction (through the tubular mesh) of non paretic upper limb for a period of 12 and 24 hours, 5 days per week for 4 weeks.
|
Rehabilitation in upper limb during and after applying of FUT (through the tubular mesh) post stroke.
|
|
Active Comparator: Classical Kinesiotherapy
Rehabilitation of classical kinesiotherapy,at least 2 times a week for 4 weeks.
|
Applying classical kinesiotherapy in upper limb post stroke.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of RMS activity through surface electromyography.
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Evaluations shall be performed weekly during the treatment period and 1 monthly assessment for 3 months after the protocol without therapeutic intervention.
|
4 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate the strength handgrip (Kgf) of hemiparetic patients submitted to FUT post stroke.
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Evaluations shall be performed weekly during the treatment period and 1 monthly assessment for 3 months after the protocol without therapeutic intervention.
|
4 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tamyris Padovani dos Santos, University of Sao Paulo
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Michaelsen SM, Rocha AS, Knabben RJ, Rodrigues LP, Fernandes CG. Translation, adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the administration manual for the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Jan-Feb;15(1):80-8.
- Liepert J, Uhde I, Graf S, Leidner O, Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol. 2001 Apr;248(4):315-21. doi: 10.1007/s004150170207.
- Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Higgins J, Salbach NM, Finch L, Wood-Dauphinee SL. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): a comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2003 Jul;83(7):617-30.
- Brown MM. Brain attack: a new approach to stroke. Clin Med (Lond). 2002 Jan-Feb;2(1):60-5. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.2-1-60.
- Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.7.864.
- Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, Mendes HF, Menezes DF, Mariano DC, Pereira IF, Teixeira LA, Jesus PA, de Queiroz DC, Pereira DF, Pinto E, Leite JP, Lopes AA, Oliveira-Filho J. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):119-22. doi: 10.1159/000177918. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
- Charles J, Gordon AM. A critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy and forced use in children with hemiplegia. Neural Plast. 2005;12(2-3):245-61; discussion 263-72. doi: 10.1155/NP.2005.245.
- Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):398-411. doi: 10.1177/1545968306298414. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
- De Marchis GM, Foderaro G, Jemora J, Zanchi F, Altobianchi A, Biglia E, Conti FM, Monotti R, Mombelli G. Mild cognitive impairment in medical inpatients: the Mini-Mental State Examination is a promising screening tool. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;29(3):259-64. doi: 10.1159/000288772. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
- De D, Wynn E. Preventing muscular contractures through routine stroke patient care. Br J Nurs. 2014 Jul 24-Aug 13;23(14):781-6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.14.781.
- Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Krishnamurthi R, Theadom A, Starkey N. Epidemiology of ischaemic stroke and traumatic brain injury. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Dec;24(4):485-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
- Fuzaro AC, Guerreiro CT, Galetti FC, Juca RB, Araujo JE. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy and modified forced-use therapy for stroke patients are both effective to promote balance and gait improvements. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012 Apr;16(2):157-65. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000010. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
- Green J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002 May;16(3):306-14. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr495oa.
- Hagg S, Thorn LM, Forsblom CM, Gordin D, Saraheimo M, Tolonen N, Waden J, Liebkind R, Putaala J, Tatlisumak T, Groop PH; FinnDiane Study Group. Different risk factor profiles for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2558-62. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005724. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
- Lavados PM, Hennis AJ, Fernandes JG, Medina MT, Legetic B, Hoppe A, Sacks C, Jadue L, Salinas R. Stroke epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies at a regional level: Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Apr;6(4):362-72. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70003-0.
- Mark VW, Taub E, Morris DM. Neuroplasticity and constraint-induced movement therapy. Eura Medicophys. 2006 Sep;42(3):269-84.
- Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006 Apr;37(4):1045-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000206463.66461.97. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
- Scherbakov N, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Dirnagl U, Doehner W. Stroke induced Sarcopenia: muscle wasting and disability after stroke. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;170(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
- Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. J Rehabil Med. 2003 May;(41 Suppl):34-40. doi: 10.1080/16501960310010124.
- Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;74(4):347-54.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TPSantos
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.