HIV Prevention Toolkit for HIV-negative Male Couples (MCAP)

March 28, 2019 updated by: Daniel J Feaster, University of Miami

Development of a HIV Prevention Toolkit for At-risk HIV-negative Male Couples

Though technology is integrated into the lives of our target population, use of any particular technology will depend on the content delivered, aesthetic appeal, and overall design. Based on the completion and analysis of data from Phase 1, the investigators were able to obtain feedback on HIV-negative male couples' attitudes toward the original content in the prevention toolkit modules. The research team, along with the web-developers, used this feedback to specifically tailor the content of the modules to fit the unique needs of the intervention's target population: at risk HIV-negative male couples. For Phase 2, the investigators conducted focus groups at each site to help identify strengths and potential areas for improvement of the prevention toolkit, which will be incorporated before piloting it in the intervention for Phase 3 of this project. After assessing the acceptability of the prevention toolkit, including the content of modules, aesthetic appeal, and overall design with HIV-negative male couples target population, the research team will pilot test whether the RCT with the prevention toolkit will help reduce HIV risk through formation and adherence to a sexual agreement, reduction in occurrences of condomless anal sex with casual sex partners, and increase testing behaviors among at-risk HIV-negative male couples. The interactive website, herein referred to as the "HIV prevention toolkit" will contain unique modules about sexual agreements and effective HIV prevention strategies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
298

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Clinical Research Building

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligible male couples:

  1. are identified as two men (i.e., main partners) who had been in a sexual relationship together for > 6 months;
  2. are at least 18 years of age;
  3. are self-reported as being HIV-negative;
  4. had been practicing CAS in their relationship for > 6 months;
  5. report no recent history (< 1 year) of intimate partner violence (IPV) or coercion;
  6. have had no current sexual agreement; and
  7. own a smartphone and have an alternate method to access the Internet (e.g., computer).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Interested participants, including both men of a male couple, who did not meet the inclusion criteria above will be excluded from participating in Phase 3 of this study.
  2. Individuals who participated in Phase 1 or 2 will be were excluded from participating in Phase 3 of this study.
  3. Adults who are unable to consent;
  4. Individuals who are not yet adults;
  5. Pregnant and non-pregnant women, and prisoners.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Couples assigned to the control group will be directed to the website that only has the following: 1) module about learning about effective HIV prevention strategies, 2) sexual health resource center, and 3) a link to download a corresponding smartphone app that will include the sexual health resource center.
Behavioral: Male Couples Agreement Project
Couples assigned to the intervention group will first as individuals view general video about purpose of study and how to use website functions; timeline activity about their relationship; select top values about their relationship; learn about effective HIV prevention strategies; learn about sexual agreements; select what items they want to have in their agreement; explore a learning module about testing and view the sexual health resource center. As a couple, they will log back into the website to view and compare timelines and relationship values; watch a video about communicating more effectively; negotiate and decide together what items they want to include in their agreement; explore the sexual health resource center and/or any other modules from when they were logged into the website as individuals; download a corresponding smartphone app that will include a copy of their newly created agreement and sexual health resource center.
Active Comparator: Intervention group
Couples assigned to the intervention group will first as individuals view general video about purpose of study and how to use website functions; timeline activity about their relationship; select top values about their relationship; learn about effective HIV prevention strategies; learn about sexual agreements; select what items they want to have in their agreement; explore a learning module about testing and view the sexual health resource center. As a couple, they will log back into the website to view and compare timelines and relationship values; watch a video about communicating more effectively; negotiate and decide together what items they want to include in their agreement; explore the sexual health resource center and/or any other modules from when they were logged into the website as individuals; download a corresponding smartphone app that will include a copy of their newly created agreement and sexual health resource center.
Behavioral: Male Couples Agreement Project
Couples assigned to the intervention group will first as individuals view general video about purpose of study and how to use website functions; timeline activity about their relationship; select top values about their relationship; learn about effective HIV prevention strategies; learn about sexual agreements; select what items they want to have in their agreement; explore a learning module about testing and view the sexual health resource center. As a couple, they will log back into the website to view and compare timelines and relationship values; watch a video about communicating more effectively; negotiate and decide together what items they want to include in their agreement; explore the sexual health resource center and/or any other modules from when they were logged into the website as individuals; download a corresponding smartphone app that will include a copy of their newly created agreement and sexual health resource center.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Formation of a Sexual Agreement at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 month
Self-reports of yes/no to forming a sexual agreement via electronic survey
6 month
Adherence to a Sexual Agreement at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 month
Self-report of yes/no of adhering to a sexual agreement
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Formation of a Sexual Agreement at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 month
Self-reports of yes/no to forming a sexual agreement via electronic survey
3 month
Adherence to a Sexual Agreement
Time Frame: 3 month
Self-reports of yes/no to adhering to a sexual agreement via electronic survey
3 month
Had Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner During Months 0-3
Time Frame: 3 month
Self-reports of yes/no of any anal sex with casual male sex partner between months and month 3 via electronic survey
3 month
Had Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner Reported at Month 6
Time Frame: month 6
Self-reports of yes/no any anal sex with casual male sex partner, measured at month 6 via electronic survey (about the previous 3 months, i.e., timeframe between months 3-6).
month 6
Test for HIV During Past 3 Months (Months 0-3)
Time Frame: 3 month
Self-reports of yes/no via electronic survey taken at 3 month.
3 month
Test for HIV During the Last 3 Months (Months 3-6)
Time Frame: month 6
Self-reports of yes/no any test for HIV at month 6 assessment, collected via electronic survey for timeframe between months 3 and 6.
month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Miami

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jason W Mitchell, PhD, University of Miami

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20140561
  • R34MH102098 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings