Influence of Probiotic and Symbiotic in Body Weight, Blood Sugar and Lipemia of Obese Women

December 5, 2019 updated by: Louise Crovesy de Oliveira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether gut microbiota modulation by probiotic and symbiotic contribute with weight loss and improvement of metabolic parameters in women with obesity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We will evaluate the effects of probiotic and symbiotic on weigh loss, blood glucose, lipid profile, metabolomic profile, and gut microbiota composition variables in women with obesity.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21
        • Louise Crovesy de Oliveira

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women;
  • Adult;
  • Obese (BMI between 30 and 39,9 Kg/m²).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or nursing;
  • Smokers;
  • Drinkers;
  • Use of drug or phytotherapic;
  • Diagnosis of any cronic disease;
  • Daily consumption of yogurt.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Probiotic
Hypocaloric diet associated with capsule containing 1billion UFC Bifidobacterium lactis and sache with 5 g of maltodextrin
Dietary supplement: Probiotic
Hypocaloric diet associated with capsule containing 1billion UFC Bifidobacterium lactis and sache of maltodextrin
Other Names:
  • Bifidobacterium lactis
Active Comparator: Symbiotic
Hypocaloric diet associated with capsule containing 1billion UFC Bifidobacterium lactis and sache with 5 g of fructooligosaccharide
Dietary supplement: Symbiotic
Hypocaloric diet associated with capsule containing 1billion UFC Bifidobacterium lactis and sache of fructooligosaccharide
Other Names:
  • Bifidobacterium lactis and fructooligosaccharide
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Hypocaloric diet associated with capsule containing 50g of gelatin and sache with 5 g of maltodextrin
Dietary supplement: Placebo
Hypocaloric diet associated with capsule containing 50g of gelatin and sache of maltodextrin
Other Names:
  • Gelatin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the effect of probiotic and symbiotic on weight loss of women obese
Time Frame: Baseline and 60 days and 15 days after the end of the intervention
Determine and evaluate change in body weight and body mass index after intervention.
Baseline and 60 days and 15 days after the end of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of probiotic and symbiotic on blood glucose
Time Frame: Baseline, 60 days and 15 days after the end of the intervention
Determine and comparing the blood glucose in plasma before and after intervention
Baseline, 60 days and 15 days after the end of the intervention
Effect of probiotic and symbiotic on insulin resistance
Time Frame: Baseline and 60 days
Compare insulin resistance through HOMA-IR calculation before and after intervention and evaluate whether the intervention improvement in this parameter.
Baseline and 60 days
Effect of probiotic and symbiotic on lipid profile
Time Frame: Baseline and 60 days
Compare lipid profile (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, very low-density lipoprotein, triglyceride) in serum of blood before and after intervention and evaluate whether the intervention improvement in this parameter.
Baseline and 60 days
Effect probiotic and symbiotic on blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline,60 days and 15 days after intervention conclusion
Determine blood pressure and evaluate whether the intervention improvement blood pressure.
Baseline,60 days and 15 days after intervention conclusion
Effect of probiotic and symbiotic on gut microbiota composition
Time Frame: Baseline, 60 days and 15 days after intervention conclusion
Determine and comparing the amount filos (Fimicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia e Proteobacteria) in gut microbiota and whether the change in microbiota composition continue after stop probiotic and symbiotic intake
Baseline, 60 days and 15 days after intervention conclusion
Effect of probiotic and symbiotic on stool consitency by Bristol scale
Time Frame: Baseline,60 days and 15 days after intervention conclusion
Determine and comparing the stool consistency by Bristol scale. The Bristol scale is composed of 7 different stool consistency, being 1 and 2 lumpy, 3 and 4 normal, 5 to 7 loose.
Baseline,60 days and 15 days after intervention conclusion
Effect of probiotic and symbiotic on gastrointestinal symptons
Time Frame: Baseline,60 days and 15 days after intervention conclusion
Evaluate the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms related to the probiotic and symbiotic. The gastrointestinal symptoms analyzed were abdominal pains, abdominal distension and abdominal discomfort, flatus, borborygmus using the Likert scale of 5 point, which 0 is absence of symptom and 4 is every day.
Baseline,60 days and 15 days after intervention conclusion
Effect of probiotic and symbiotic on metabolomic profile
Time Frame: Baseline and 60 days
Determine and comparing change in metabolomic profile before and after intervention. The metabolomic profile was evaluated in the serum of blood Bruker DRX 500 MHz equipment (Bruker Spectrospin, Karlsruhe, Germany) generating hydrogen isotope 1 (1H)-NMR spectra, that was compared to database Human Metabolome Data Base.
Baseline and 60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Rio de Janeiro State Research Supporting Foundation (FAPERJ)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Louise C Oliveira, MD student, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 5, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CEP 104-14

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings