Evaluation of the Relationship of TOP2α Expression and Effect of Non Dose-dense Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

July 21, 2015 updated by: Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Evaluation of the Relationship of TOP2α Expression and Effect of Anthracyclines Followed Taxanes or Contains no Taxanes Non Dose-dense Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: a Prospective, Non-interventional, Multicentre Trail

This is a prospective、multicenter、non-comparative interventional case series. 800 breast cancer patients who have already received chemotherapy prior to this study will be enrolled in the group, including 400 patients received the anthracyclines followed taxanes chemotherapy, and the other 400 patients who have received regiments containing no taxanes. Three tumor tissue slices of all the enrolled patients will be collected for TOP2α assay. Meanwhile, 10 years followed-up survey will be conducted. The relationship of TOP2α expression and 5- year or 10-year disease free survival(DFS) and overall survival（OS）will be identified in this study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

800 breast cancer patients who have received chemotherapy prior to this study will be enrolled in the group, including 400 patients received the anthracyclines followed taxanes chemotherapy(Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 d1, Cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 d1，21days/cycle, 4 cycles, followed by Docetaxel 75mg/m2,d1, 21days/cycle, 4 cycles;or paclitaxel：Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 d1 cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 d1, 21day/cycle, 4 cycles, followed by paclitaxel 80mg/m2, weekly, 12 wks), and the other 400 patients who have received regiments containing no taxanes (FEC：5-FU 600mg/m2 d1,Epirubicin 90mg/m2 d1, Cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 d1, 21day/cycle, 6 cycles; or EC: Epirubicin 90mg/m2 d1, Cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 d1,21 day/cycle, 6 cycles).The patients will be enrolled in the groups within one month after chemotherapy.Three tumor tissue slices of all the enrolled patients will be collected for TOP2α assay. Meanwhile, 10 years followed-up survey will be conducted. The relationship of TOP2α expression and 5-year or 10-year disease free survival(DFS) and overall survival（OS）will be identified in this study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Tianjin, China, 300060
        • Recruiting
        • Jin Zhang
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jin Zhang, Pro.
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

800 breast cancer patients who have already received chemotherapy prior to this study will be enrolled in the group, including 400 patients who have received the anthracyclines followed taxanes chemotherapy, and the other 400 patients have received regiments containing no taxanes.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For inclusion in the study, subjects must fulfil all of the following criteria:

  1. . Signed and dated informed consent indicating that the patient (or legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all the pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrollment.
  2. . Invasive breast cancer confirmed by histology or cytology with the tumor complete resection.
  3. . Patients without remote organs metastasis.
  4. . The Ages of patients ≥ 18 years and ≤70 years.
  5. . Patients with positive axillary lymph nodes, or negative axillary lymph nodes plus one of these conditions: Triple-negative breast cancer, HER- 2(+),Ki-67≥15%.
  6. . The values of aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alanine aminotransferase(ALT), alkaline phosphatase(ALP), total bilirubin(TBIL), UREA, CREA were less than 2 times of upper limits of normal at the beginning of aromatase inhibitors（AIs） therapy.
  7. . TOP2α is available to be detected in the primary tumour tissue.
  8. . Patients received the regimens of anthracyclines followed Taxanes or containing no Taxanes non-dose dense chemotherapy suggested by the guidelines of National Comprehensive Cancer Network （NCCN) 2014.

Exclusion Criteria:

Any of the following is regarded as a criterion for exclusion from the study:

  1. . Patients is in the period of pregnancy or lactation.
  2. . Bilateral breast cancer, inflammatory breast cancer or carcinoma in situ.
  3. . Previous received neo-adjuvant therapy, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy or endocrinotherapy.
  4. . Presence of other life-threatening cancers.
  5. . Any severe concomitant condition: uncontrolled cardiac disease or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. et al.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TOP2αexpressions of participants
Time Frame: one year
The TOP2αexpression levels of the 800 enrolled patients tissue samples will be assayed by immunohistochemistry
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease Free Survival time of participants
Time Frame: ten year
Ten years followed-up survey will be conducted to identify the 5-year and 10-year Disease Free Survival time of participants.
ten year
Overall Survival time of participants
Time Frame: ten year
Ten years followed-up survey will be conducted to identify the 5-year and 10-year Overall Survival time of participants.
ten year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • E2014168

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings