The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Physical Performance and Exertional Rhabdomyolysis

December 23, 2015 updated by: Sheba Medical Center

The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) on Physical Performance and Exertional Rhabdomyolysis

In order to examine the effect of RIPC on skeleton muscle exertional damage and on aerobic and anaerobic physical performances, 30 healthy volunteers will undergo a series of different physical tests twice; once without intervention and a second time with RIPC intervention or placebo (false) intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

30 healthy civilians volunteers will be recruited and divided randomly into 2 groups: RIPC group and control group.

The experiment protocol consist 2 series (with a month between them), both series include the described 3 days:

Day 1 - anthropometry measurements and VO2max test (BRUCE protocol). Day 2 - steps test (heled protocol). Day 3 - anaerobic test (wingate protocol), 1 hour rest and time to exhaustion test (heled protocol).

The first series will be performed without applying any intervention and is considered as baseline measurements for both groups. the second series will be performed as follows: a. RIPC group: applying RIPC exposure (placing a sphygmomanometer on the non-dominant hand and applying pressure of 200 mmHg for 5 min followed by 5 min without pressure X 4 repeats) at the beginning of every meeting. b. control group: with placebo (false) exposure (placing a sphygmomanometer on the non-dominant hand and applying pressure of 100 mmHg for 5 min followed by 5 min without pressure X 4 repeats) at the beginning of every meeting.

Blood ample, lactic acid and urine sample will be tested at the beginning and end of every meeting (testing for muscle, skeleton and kidney function markers).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Israel
    • Ramat- Gan
      • Tel-Hashomer, Ramat- Gan, Israel
        • Sheba medical center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18-30
  • healthy civilians volunteers
  • with no background illnesses
  • above average fitness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known chronic medical illness
  • routine medication usage
  • history of rhabdomyolysis
  • the physician decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: RIPC intervention group

The experiment protocol consist 2 series (with a month between them), both series include the described 3 days:

Day 1 - anthropometry measurements and VO2max test (BRUCE protocol). Day 2 - steps test (heled protocol). Day 3 - anaerobic test (wingate protocol), 1 hour rest and time to exhaustion test (heled protocol).

the second series will be performed after RIPC intervention exposure at the beginning of every meeting.
Procedure: RIPC intervention exposure
placing a sphygmomanometer on the non-dominant hand and applying pressure of 200 mmHg for 5 min followed by 5 min without pressure X 4 repeats
Placebo Comparator: false exopsure group

The experiment protocol consist 2 series (with a month between them), both series include the described 3 days:

Day 1 - anthropometry measurements and VO2max test (BRUCE protocol). Day 2 - steps test (heled protocol). Day 3 - anaerobic test (wingate protocol), 1 hour rest and time to exhaustion test (heled protocol).

the second series will be performed after placebo intervention exposure at the beginning of every meeting.
Procedure: placebo intervention exposure
placing a sphygmomanometer on the non-dominant hand and applying pressure of 100 mmHg for 5 min followed by 5 min without pressure X 4 repeats.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
creatine phosphokinase (CPK)
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
CPK is a marker for muscle damage assessed in blood test. blood sample will be taken before and after step test, anaerobic test and time to exhaustion test.
6 experiment days for each participant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
oxygen consumption (VO2)
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
VO2 will be monitored continuously using a metabolic system (ERGOTEST 680, ZAN, GERMANY ) during VO2max test and time to exhaustion test
6 experiment days for each participant
heart rate variability (HRV)
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
HRV will be measured using a wearable heart rate monitor (Polar® sensor and heart rate monitor watch) at rest for 10 min, before and after RIPC. data will be analysed by an expert.
6 experiment days for each participant
lactic acid
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
lactic acid level is assessed from blood drop (finger sting), will be taken before and after every test. lactic acid is a marker for anaerobic effort evaluating.
6 experiment days for each participant
blood count
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
blood counts are done to monitor overall health and to confirm a diagnosis of some medical conditions.
6 experiment days for each participant
apolipoprotein A1 (APO-A1) levels
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
APO-A1 is measured in blood chemistry as a marker for cholesterol.
6 experiment days for each participant
renal function (composite)
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
renal function (in order or not) will be evaluated from two markers measured in blood sample (chemistry): creatinine and urea.
6 experiment days for each participant
inflammation (composite)
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
C-reactive protein (CRP) and blood sedimentation rate (assessed from blood sample) are indicators for inflammation.
6 experiment days for each participant
heart rate
Time Frame: 6 experiment days for each participant
HR will be monitored during the physical tests using a wearable heart rate monitor (Polar® sensor and heart rate monitor watch).
6 experiment days for each participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sheba Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SHEBA-15-2139-OF-CTIL

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings