Carbon Dioxide Laser vs. Electrocoagulation for the Therapy of Condyloma
Carbon Dioxide Laser Ablation Versus Electrocoagulation - a Prospective, Randomized Single-center Trial Comparing Two Surgical Treatments in Women Undergoing Therapy for Condyloma Acuminata
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ziad Hilal, Dr. med.
- Phone Number: +49231529747
- Email: z.hilal@zydolab.de
Study Locations
-
-
North Rhine-Westphalia
-
Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 44625
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Ruhr University Bochum
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- informed consent
- women with anogenital affection of condyloma acuminata
Exclusion Criteria:
- significant language barrier
- pregnancy
- unwillingness to participate
- the use of blood thinner or known coagulation disorder
- the use of immunosuppressive medicament
- HIV-Infection
- malignant diseases
- local therapy within 8 weeks before Treatment
- wound healing disorder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Carbon dioxide Laser ablation
Excision of genital warts using a carbon dioxide laser, ie CO2 Laser
|
surgical Instrument to achieve excision of genital warts by a pulsed laser of 15 Watt voltage - NOTE: pulsed 15 W was never used; the actual setting was 5W continuous
|
|
Active Comparator: Electrocoagulation
Excision of genital warts using a superficial electrical coagulation mode, ie spray coagulation
|
surgical Instrument to achieve excision of genital warts by a deep tissue electrocoagulation of 80 Watt voltage
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cosmetic result
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Cosmetic result judged by the Patient 6 weeks after Treatment using a 11-step numerical rating scale (NRS)
|
6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Operation time
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
the time from the beginning of the Treatment until the end of the operation (the end of hemostatic interventions) will be measured in minutes
|
20 minutes
|
|
Operative complications
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Operative complications defined as necessity to intervene surgically up to 14 days postoperatively (number of patients with operative complications and type of complication)
|
14 days
|
|
users satisfaction
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
surgeons will score their satisfaction concerning the used technique by using a 11-step numerical rating scale (NRS) within 30 minutes after surgery
|
30 minutes
|
|
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 5 hours
|
patients will score their postoperative pain Level using a 11-step numerical rating scale (NRS) within 5 hours after surgery
|
5 hours
|
|
Subjects satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Patients will score their Overall satisfaction by using a 11-step numerical rating scale (NRS) 6 weeks after Treatment
|
6 weeks
|
|
Recurrence of genital warts
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
an examination will be performed 12 weeks after surgery; Recurrence of genital warts will be determined if one or more Areas are infected by genital warts
|
12 weeks
|
|
Subjects satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Patients will score their Overall satisfaction by using a 11-step numerical rating scale (NRS) 12 weeks after Treatment
|
12 weeks
|
|
Cosmetic result
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Cosmetic result judged by the Patient 12 weeks after Treatment using a 11-step numerical rating scale (NRS)
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Clemens Tempfer, Dr. med., Marien Hospital Herne, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease Attributes
- Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- DNA Virus Infections
- Skin Diseases
- Skin Diseases, Infectious
- Tumor Virus Infections
- Skin Diseases, Viral
- Papillomavirus Infections
- Warts
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Condylomata Acuminata
- Therapeutics
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Ablation Techniques
- Cautery
- Electrocoagulation
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CONDYLOMA-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.