Assessment of Clemastine Fumarate as a Remyelinating Agent in Acute Optic Neuritis (ReCOVER) (ReCOVER)

March 9, 2026 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Clemastine Fumarate as a Remyelinating Agent in Acute Optic Neuritis

The main purpose of this study is to assess clemastine as a remyelinating agent in patients with acute optic neuritis.The study will also evaluate the tolerability of clemastine, originally approved as first-generation antihistamine, in patients with optic neuritis. Study procedures will include assessments for evidence of remyelination in the anterior visual pathway and in the brain using electrophysiologic techniques and magnetic resonance imaging. If they are on one, patients in this study can remain on their standard disease modifying treatment during the course of the study. However, patients cannot participate in any other investigational new drug research study concurrently.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Optic neuritis is an inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the optic nerve. It is most often characterized by visual loss or blurred vision along with dyschromatopsiaaccompanied by pain (especially with eye movement) and no demonstrable evidence of an alternate diagnosis such as ischemia or retinal disease. It can also be associated with a swollen optic disc (Optic Neuritis Study Group 1991, Hutchinson, W.M. 1976) and optic nerve enhancement on MRI (Kupersmith 2002).

Functional high-throughput screening for compounds that promote remyelination presents a major unmet need in the therapeutic arsenal for multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating conditions such as optic neuritis. Screening for myelin repair is problematic, as functional remyelination requires the presence of intact neuronal axons. Standard methods are not suited for high-throughput formats. We performed a detailed screen of over 1500 FDA approved small molecule drugs to identify agents that could be promising for remyelination. Engineered with conical dimensions, our micropillar technology permitted resolution of the extent and length of membrane wrapping from a single 2-dimensional image. Confocal imaging acquired from the base to the tip of the pillars allows for the fluorescence detection of concentric wrapping observed as "rings" of myelin membrane. The platform was formatted in 96-well plates, amenable to semi-automated random acquisition and automated detection and quantification. Upon initiating a screen of 1500 bioactive molecules, we identified Clemastine as a compound that potentially enhances oligodendrocyte differentiation and remyelination. We then validated this and other drugs in preclinical assays as well as in animal models of primary myelination and remyelination after inflammatory and chemical demyelination. Together, our findings illustrate the proof of concept for a novel high-throughput screening platform for potential regenerative therapeutics in MS (Chan JR et al. 2014).

This study is intended to assess for clinical evidence of remyelination using Clemastine Fumarate in patients with acute inflammatory injury causing demyelination of the anterior visual pathway as a consequence of acute demyelinating optic neuritis. The study is designed to assess tolerability and clinical efficacy of Clemastine using outcomes intended to assess for (a) adverse events and (b) recovery of myelin. This study is complementary to an earlier study evaluating clemastine in chronic demyelinated optic neuropathy and serves as part of a proof of concept program intended to evaluate methods for conducting remyelination trials in MS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed or suspected to have an acute demyelinating optic neuritis in at least one eye within 3 weeks from the onset of any visual symptom other than pain
  • Use of disease-modifying therapies is not a contraindication
  • Use of appropriate contraception during the period of trial (women)
  • Understand and sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other major ophthalmologic diseases / concomitant ophthalmologic disorders (e.g. diabetes, macular degeneration, glaucoma, severe myopia, etc)
  • Disc hemorrhages in the qualifying eye
  • No light perception in qualifying eye
  • Simultaneous bilateral optic neuritis
  • Cotton wool spots in the qualifying eye
  • Macular star in the qualifying eye
  • History of significant cardiac conduction block
  • History of cancer
  • Suicidal ideation or behavior in 6 months prior to baseline
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant
  • Involved with other study protocols simultaneously without prior approval
  • Concomitant use of any other putative remyelinating therapy as determined by the investigator
  • Serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL; aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), or alkaline phosphatase > 2 times the upper limit of normal
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse within the past year
  • Untreated B12 deficiency (as determined by B12 serological assessments and metabolites including methylmalonic acid (MMA) and homocysteine) or untreated hypothyroidism
  • Clinically significant cardiac, metabolic, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, urologic, endocrinologic, neurologic, pulmonary, psychiatric, dermatologic, allergic, renal, or other major diseases that, in the PI's judgment, may affect the interpretation of study results or patient safety
  • History or presence of clinically significant medical illness or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator would preclude participation in the study.
  • Positive for NMO antibody discovered within the first 2 weeks after randomization.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Clemastine
Participants will receive clemastine until 3 months and then will be off treatment until 9 month time point.
Drug: Clemastine
12mg (4mg 3x/day) clemastine for 7 days followed by 8mg clemastine (4mg 2x/day) until 3 months. Patients will be off treatment from 3-9 months and will be reevaluated at 9 months.
Other Names:
  • Tavist
  • Clemastine fumarate
  • Walhist
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive placebo until 3 months and then will be off treatment until 9 month time point.
Drug: Placebo
Equivalent placebo. 12mg (4mg 3x/day) placebo for 7 days followed by 8mg placebo (4mg 2x/day) until 3 months. Patients will be off treatment from 3-9 months and will be reevaluated at 9 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in P100 latency on full-field visual evoked potential
Time Frame: baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 9 months
To evaluate the efficacy of clemastine relative to placebo for reducing P100 latencies on full field transient pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. Measure will be reported as difference in P100 latency from baseline to 9 months.
baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 9 months
Change in low contrast visual acuity
Time Frame: baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 9 months
The second primary outcome is to measure the effectiveness of clemastine relative to placebo at improving patient performance on ETDRS low contrast visual acuity chart testing (2.5% black on white) during the recovery from an acute optic neuritis. Measure will be reported as difference in ETDRS score from baseline to 9 months.
baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness on optical coherence tomography
Time Frame: baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 9 months
The primary outcome is to measure the effectiveness of clemastine relative to placebo at preventing the loss of retinal nerve fiber assessed via optical coherence tomography (OCT). Measure will be reported as difference in nerve fiber thickness between baseline and 9 months.
baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 9 months
Radiological outcomes assessed by magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: baseline, 9 month
To evaluate the efficacy of clemastine relative to placebo in increasing magnetization transfer ratios and myelin water fraction derived from magnetic resonance imaging of the brain during the period of exposure to active treatment. Measures will be reported as change between baseline and 9 months.
baseline, 9 month
Expanded Disability Status Scale score
Time Frame: baseline, 9 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Clemastine relative to placebo in reducing the EDSS score at 9 months.The EDSS is an ordinal scale used for assessing neurological impairment of MS based on a neurological examination. It consists of scores in each of seven functional systems (FS) and an ambulation score that are then combined to determine the EDSS [ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS)]. The FSs are the Visual, Brain Stem, Pyramidal, Cerebellar, Sensory, Bowel & Bladder, and Cerebral functions. The FSs and EDSS steps will be assessed in a standardized manner. EDSS is a widely used and accepted instrument to evaluate disability status at a given time and longitudinally, to assess disability progression in clinical studies in MS.
baseline, 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Francisco

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ari Green, MD, MCR, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15-17428

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings