Comparative Volumetric Assessment of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing Different Bone Grafting Materials
Prospective, Comparative Volumetric Assessment of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing Different Bone Grafting Materials (SYMBIOS CORTICAL-CANCELLOUS GRANULE MIX; SYMBIOS OSTEOGRAF LD-300; OSTEOGRAF/N-300) Following Tooth Extraction
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- University of North Carolina School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provision of informed consent
- ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years
- Good physical health (ASAI/II)
- Extraction of maxillary premolar, canine or incisor, or mandibular premolar and canine required
- Teeth adjacent (mesial and distal) to study site must consist of two stable natural teeth with minimal restorations, without signs of periodontal bone loss (> 3 mm) and/or significant soft tissue deficiencies
Exclusion Criteria:
- Buccal plate dehiscence and/or fenestration >3mm at study site following extraction
- Untreated rampant caries and uncontrolled periodontal disease
- Inadequate oral hygiene (estimated plaque score >20%)
- Smokers using more than 10 cigarettes or equivalent per day
- Smokeless tobacco use or e-cigarette use
Compromised physical health and/or uncontrolled or severe systemic diseases including:
ASA III/IV Metabolic bone disease History of malignancy History or radiotherapy or chemotherapy for malignancy in the past 5 years History of autoimmune disease Long-term steroidal or antibiotic therapy Uncontrolled diabetes Known alcohol or drug abuse
- Systemic or local disease or condition that would compromise post-operative healing
- Use of any substance or medication that will influence bone metabolism
- Known pregnancy
- Unable or unwilling to return for follow-up visits for a period of 6 months
- Unlikely to be able to comply with study procedures according to Investigators judgement
- Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study
- Previous enrollment or randomization of treatment in the present study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A- Allograft, Membrane
Symbios mineralized cortical-cancellous granule mix, Symbios OsteoShield Collagen Resorbable Membrane
|
Allograft, Membrane- Symbios mineralized cortical-cancellous granule mix, Symbios OsteoShield Collagen Resorbable Membrane
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B- Alloplast, Membrane
Symbios OsteoGraf/LD-300, Symbios OsteoShield Collagen Resorbable Membrane
|
Alloplast, Membrane- Symbios OsteoGraf/LD-300, Symbios OsteoShield Collagen Resorbable Membrane
|
|
Active Comparator: Group C- Xenograft, Membrane
OsteoGraf/N-300 , Symbios OsteoShield Collagen Resorbable Membrane
|
Xenograft, Membrane- OsteoGraf/N-300,Symbios OsteoShield Collagen Resorbable Membrane
|
|
Active Comparator: Group D- Membrane
Symbios OsteoShield Collagen Resorbable Membrane
|
Membrane - Symbios OsteoShield Collagen Resorbable Membrane
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Mean Change in Bone Volume
Time Frame: time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
The change in bone volume at 3 months following extraction will be calculated using data from DICOM images acquired by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) using 3D software
|
time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Osseous Dimensional Changes-Horizontal
Time Frame: time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
The amount of linear (mm) horizontal bone change at 3 months following tooth extraction at a position located 2mm and 4mm vertically away from the height of the buccal plate.
Data will be calculated using data from DICOM images acquired by CBCT using 3D software.
|
time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
|
Mean Osseous Dimensional Changes-Vertical
Time Frame: time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
The amount of linear (mm) vertical bone change at 3 months following tooth extraction at a position located mid-buccal, mid-palatal, mesial and distal of the extraction site.
Data will be calculated using data from DICOM images acquired by CBCT using 3D software.
|
time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
|
Total Mean Change in Soft Tissue Volume
Time Frame: time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
The change in soft tissue volume at 3 months following tooth extraction will be assessed through the use of 3D scans of patient dental models at two time points following extraction and ridge preservation at 3 months.
|
time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
|
Mean Soft Tissue Dimensional Changes-Horizontal
Time Frame: time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
The amount of linear (mm) horizontal soft tissue change at 3 months following tooth extraction at a position located 2mm and 4mm vertically away from the height of the buccal bone plate.
Data will be calculated using data from DICOM images acquired by CBCT and overlaid 3D scans of patient dental models using 3D software.
|
time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
|
Mean Soft Tissue Dimensional Changes-Vertical
Time Frame: time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
The amount of linear (mm) vertical soft tissue change at 3 months following tooth extraction at a position located mid-buccal, mid-palatal, mesial and distal of the extraction site.
Data will be calculated using data from 3D scans of patient dental models using 3D software.
|
time of extraction to 3 months post extraction
|
|
Soft Tissue Dimensional Change at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
|
The amount of soft tissue change will be assessed through the use of dental casts at two time points following extraction and ridge preservation at 6 months.
|
Month 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jonathan Reside, DDS MS, Dept. of Periodontology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:1-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x.
- Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.
- Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.
- Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:260-71.
- Ten Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):779-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
- Fienitz T, Schwarz F, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Becker J, Rothamel D. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):882-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02232.x. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
- Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Dec;10(4):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00083.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
- Kim TS, Caruso JM, Christensen H, Torabinejad M. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures. J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.028.
- Pertl L, Gashi-Cenkoglu B, Reichmann J, Jakse N, Pertl C. Preoperative assessment of the mandibular canal in implant surgery: comparison of rotational panoramic radiography (OPG), computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for preoperative assessment in implant surgery. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Spring;6(1):73-80.
- Ganguly R, Ruprecht A, Vincent S, Hellstein J, Timmons S, Qian F. Accuracy of linear measurement in the Galileos cone beam computed tomography under simulated clinical conditions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Jul;40(5):299-305. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/72117593.
- Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jun;113(6):817-26. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.005.
- Watters W 3rd, Rethman MP, Hanson NB, Abt E, Anderson PA, Carroll KC, Futrell HC, Garvin K, Glenn SO, Hellstein J, Hewlett A, Kolessar D, Moucha C, O'Donnell RJ, O'Toole JE, Osmon DR, Evans RP, Rinella A, Steinberg MJ, Goldberg M, Ristic H, Boyer K, Sluka P, Martin WR 3rd, Cummins DS, Song S, Woznica A, Gross L; American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; American Dental Association. Prevention of Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Patients Undergoing Dental Procedures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Mar;21(3):180-9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-03-180.
- Kurien S, Kattimani VS, Sriram RR, Sriram SK, Rao V K P, Bhupathi A, Bodduru RR, N Patil N. Management of pregnant patient in dentistry. J Int Oral Health. 2013 Feb;5(1):88-97. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15-1114
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.