Whole Genome Sequencing for Blood Group Genotyping and Definition as Exemplified on U- and St(a)+. (Blood Genome)

August 24, 2015 updated by: Christoph Gassner, Blood Donation Service Zurich, SRC

Applicability of Whole Genome Sequencing for Human Blood Group Genotyping and Genetic Definition of New Alleles as Exemplified on References and the Two MNSs-variants: U- and Stones(a)+

No health condition(s) are studied. Genetic background of blood groups is studied. U- and Stones(a)+ ("Caucasian type") are used as proof-of-principle samples. Disease associations of all blood group genes investigated are very rare, e.g. < 1 among 1'000 Swiss individuals (see table 1), and are not to be expected in the course of this study.

Genomic DNA of 2 U- samples were both provided as blinded reference material from New York and Vienna blood centres, respectively. Both donors are lost for follow up, and although there is no documented evidence for refusal of the respective donors to use their material in research projects, samples still lack informed consent.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All 34 human blood group systems have at least two antithetical antigens and are of potential relevance during pregnancy and transfusion. Fortunately for every day routine practice, immunizations to foreign antigens are rare. Still, incompatibilities may occur in all blood group systems and will then require typing for the respective blood group antigens.

Blood genotyping evolved as the method of choice, in cases when typing reagents are commercially unavailable, or blood is inaccessible (foetus). In databases, most entries of blood group genes lack representative polymorphism (e.g. number of alleles). Moreover, many blood group antigens are insufficiently described in their intronic and inter-genetic sequences. This is true for results of unequal crossing-overs, gene-conversions and large insertions/deletions between highly homologous genes, especially within the blood group systems of Rhesus, e.g. RhD/RhCE and MN/Ss, respectively. Only Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) allows for resolution of both problems: it delivers the whole blood group genome of an individual, and simultaneously recognizes new blood group alleles, or haplotypes. This request for ethical approval wants to test this assumption.

The antigenic determinants U- and Stones(a)+ of the blood group system MNSs still lack full genetic description and will serve as challenging examples for the description of new alleles (haplotypes) caused by large ins/del mutations of the two highly homologous genes GYPA and B. Genomic DNA of 2 U- samples were both provided as blinded reference material from New York and Vienna blood centres, respectively. Both donors are lost for follow up, and although there is no documented evidence for refusal of the respective donors to use their material in research projects, samples still lack informed consent. Additional reference samples (n max=4), and samples with suspected Stones(a)+ (n max=4) will be recruited from Zurich blood donors with informed consent, only.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
8

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Zürich
      • Schlieren, Zürich, Switzerland, 8952
        • Recruiting
        • Blutpende Zürich, Dienstleistungszentrum
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 66 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Genomic DNA of 2 U- samples were both provided as blinded reference material from New York and Vienna blood centres, respectively. Both donors are lost for follow up, and although there is no documented evidence for refusal of the respective donors to use their material in research projects, samples still lack informed consent. Additional reference samples (n max=4), and samples with suspected Stones(a)+ (n max=4) will be recruited from Zurich blood donors with informed consent, only

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Existing biomaterial (gDNA), or
  • Existing health related data for blood group U- (n max=2) and eligible for (venous) blood sampling of 20 mL, or
  • Existing blood group pheno- and genotyping data indicating St(a)+ and eligible for (venous) blood sampling of 20 mL (n max=2), or
  • Adequate blood group profile serving as reference (n max =4 & n max =4'000) and eligible for (venous) blood sampling of 20 mL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ineligible for venous blood sampling of approx. 20 mL.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
people negative in bg MNSs antigen U
Blood group (bg) system MNSs. Individuals with phenotype "U-". Homo- and heterozygous individuals may be considered.
Other: Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)
There will be no interventions needed other than blood sampling (20 mL blood) in the course of routine blood donation (450 mL blood) for 8 out of 10 individuals planned to be included as specimen, or reference samples in the study.
people positive in bg MNSs antigen St(a)
Blood group (bg) system MNSs. Individuals with phenotype "St(a)+". Homo- and heterozygous individuals may be considered.
Other: Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)
There will be no interventions needed other than blood sampling (20 mL blood) in the course of routine blood donation (450 mL blood) for 8 out of 10 individuals planned to be included as specimen, or reference samples in the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Whole Genome Sequencing for the definition of genetic background for blood group antigens U-, St(a)+
Time Frame: 2 year period
During a 2 year time-period, whole genome sequencing data generation and analysis will be used for the analysis and description of the genetic background for the blood group antigens U negativity, and for St(a).
2 year period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Blood Donation Service Zurich, SRC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christoph Gassner, PhD, Blutspende Zürich, Dienstleistungszentrum

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KEK-ZH-Nr. 2014-0408

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings