tDCS and Cognition in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis or Encephalitis

April 3, 2020 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognition in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis or Encephalitis

This research is being done to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve certain mental abilities in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) or encephalitis. Participants will be asked to come in daily for two full weeks during which time participants will undergo cognitive testing and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) brain scans. In this research, a very weak electrical current is administered to the surface of the scalp while participants complete cognitive tasks. The investigators' aim is to find out whether tDCS will improve task performance in adults with multiple sclerosis or encephalitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Participants enrolled into this study may be asked to do the following:

  • Come to the investigators' testing office at the Johns Hopkins Hospital where the tDCS equipment is located for 10 study visits.
  • Grant permission for the researchers to view medical records associated with the participant's diagnosis of multiple sclerosis or encephalitis (if applicable) and general state of health.
  • Complete a questionnaire and provide a health history in order to verify eligibility to participate and be able to safely undergo the experimental procedures.
  • Complete several computerized, written, and/or aural tasks (i.e., saying words out loud) that assess different cognitive functions such as attention, memory, language, or processing speed.
  • Wear electrodes that will be placed on the scalp with a large rubberized band. These electrodes will administer very weak electrical current (tDCS) for 30 minutes.
  • Participate in several study conditions. The exact conditions and the order will be randomized. That is, the conditions and order will vary by chance (like the flip of a coin). Under some conditions, the participant might receive active stimulation (tDCS) and under other conditions, the participant might receive placebo (or sham) stimulation. Placebo stimulation is similar to active tDCS but lasts only a few seconds. However, all groups will wear the electrodes for the same length of time to prevent the participant from knowing whether participants are receiving active tDCS or sham stimulation. The study doctor and research staff will know which group the participant is in.
  • Permission to audio and/or video-tape test sessions for later scoring and observation. These tapes will not be viewed by anyone not affiliated with the study without the participant's consent.
  • Have structural, resting-state and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans as a part of the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins East Baltimore Campus; Medical Psychiatry department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis or encephalitis
  • Over the age of 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of schizophrenia bipolar disorder
  • Beck Depression Inventory-II scores over 20
  • Mini Mental Exam below 24
  • Any uncontrolled seizure disorder
  • Any implanted metal device or hearing aids
  • Use of medication shown to interact with tDCS effectiveness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulation First
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) that is ramped up and ramped down providing the sensation of tDCS without delivering the full amount of tDCS first and then Anodal Stimulation second.
Device: Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation
Delivery of sham stimulation for 30 minutes using Neuro-Conn Direct Current (DC) Stimulator Plus.
Other Names:
  • tDCS
Device: Anodal Transcranial direct current stimulation
Delivery of transcranial direct current stimulation for 30 minutes.
Other Names:
  • tDCS
Experimental: Anodal Stimulation First
Transcranial direct current stimulation using Anodal stimulation first over the area of interest and then Sham Stimulation second.
Device: Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation
Delivery of sham stimulation for 30 minutes using Neuro-Conn Direct Current (DC) Stimulator Plus.
Other Names:
  • tDCS
Device: Anodal Transcranial direct current stimulation
Delivery of transcranial direct current stimulation for 30 minutes.
Other Names:
  • tDCS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognition as Assessed by Change in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test Scores
Time Frame: Assessed at beginning and end of a 5-day treatment week
Change in performance on an individual cognitive test measure raw score from the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MACFIMS) battery tests (i.e. Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test scores). Change scores range from -120 to + 120. Positive change scores reflect improvement at the end of the intervention relative to baseline. Negative change scores reflect decline at the end of the intervention relative to baseline.
Assessed at beginning and end of a 5-day treatment week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fatigue as Assessed by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory 30-item Short Form (MFSI-SF) Total Scores
Time Frame: Assessed at beginning and end of a 5-day treatment week
Fatigue was measured via changes in self-reported fatigue on the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory 30-item short form (MFSI-SF) total score over the course of active and sham tDCS. Change scores range from -84 to + 84. Positive change values reflect increased symptom burden at the end of the intervention relative to baseline. Negative change scores reflect reduced symptom burden at the end of the intervention relative to baseline.
Assessed at beginning and end of a 5-day treatment week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tracy Vannorsdall, PhD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00033581

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings